Individual differences in syntactic processing: Is there evidence for reader-text interactions?

Ariel N. James, Scott H. Fraundorf, Eun Kyung Lee, Duane G. Watson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

There remains little consensus about whether there exist meaningful individual differences in syntactic processing and, if so, what explains them. We argue that this partially reflects the fact that few psycholinguistic studies of individual differences include multiple constructs, multiple measures per construct, or tests for reliable measures. Here, we replicated three major syntactic phenomena in the psycholinguistic literature: use of verb distributional statistics, difficulty of object- versus subject-extracted relative clauses, and resolution of relative clause attachment ambiguities. We examine whether any individual differences in these phenomena could be predicted by language experience or general cognitive abilities (phonological ability, verbal working memory capacity, inhibitory control, and perceptual speed). We find correlations between individual differences and offline, but not online, syntactic phenomena. Condition effects on online reading time were not consistent within individuals, limiting their ability to correlate with other measures. We suggest that this might explain controversy over individual differences in language processing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)155-181
Number of pages27
JournalJournal of Memory and Language
Volume102
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Oct

Fingerprint

Syntactics
Individuality
Aptitude
Psycholinguistics
interaction
Processing
evidence
psycholinguistics
Language
Statistics
Data storage equipment
Short-Term Memory
ability
cognitive ability
Reading
language
Consensus
Individual Differences
Interaction
Reader

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
  • Language and Linguistics
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Linguistics and Language
  • Artificial Intelligence

Cite this

James, Ariel N. ; Fraundorf, Scott H. ; Lee, Eun Kyung ; Watson, Duane G. / Individual differences in syntactic processing : Is there evidence for reader-text interactions?. In: Journal of Memory and Language. 2018 ; Vol. 102. pp. 155-181.
@article{38fc5bc46d5e4d93a90e2750ecb686c3,
title = "Individual differences in syntactic processing: Is there evidence for reader-text interactions?",
abstract = "There remains little consensus about whether there exist meaningful individual differences in syntactic processing and, if so, what explains them. We argue that this partially reflects the fact that few psycholinguistic studies of individual differences include multiple constructs, multiple measures per construct, or tests for reliable measures. Here, we replicated three major syntactic phenomena in the psycholinguistic literature: use of verb distributional statistics, difficulty of object- versus subject-extracted relative clauses, and resolution of relative clause attachment ambiguities. We examine whether any individual differences in these phenomena could be predicted by language experience or general cognitive abilities (phonological ability, verbal working memory capacity, inhibitory control, and perceptual speed). We find correlations between individual differences and offline, but not online, syntactic phenomena. Condition effects on online reading time were not consistent within individuals, limiting their ability to correlate with other measures. We suggest that this might explain controversy over individual differences in language processing.",
author = "James, {Ariel N.} and Fraundorf, {Scott H.} and Lee, {Eun Kyung} and Watson, {Duane G.}",
year = "2018",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.jml.2018.05.006",
language = "English",
volume = "102",
pages = "155--181",
journal = "Journal of Memory and Language",
issn = "0749-596X",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

Individual differences in syntactic processing : Is there evidence for reader-text interactions? / James, Ariel N.; Fraundorf, Scott H.; Lee, Eun Kyung; Watson, Duane G.

In: Journal of Memory and Language, Vol. 102, 10.2018, p. 155-181.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Individual differences in syntactic processing

T2 - Is there evidence for reader-text interactions?

AU - James, Ariel N.

AU - Fraundorf, Scott H.

AU - Lee, Eun Kyung

AU - Watson, Duane G.

PY - 2018/10

Y1 - 2018/10

N2 - There remains little consensus about whether there exist meaningful individual differences in syntactic processing and, if so, what explains them. We argue that this partially reflects the fact that few psycholinguistic studies of individual differences include multiple constructs, multiple measures per construct, or tests for reliable measures. Here, we replicated three major syntactic phenomena in the psycholinguistic literature: use of verb distributional statistics, difficulty of object- versus subject-extracted relative clauses, and resolution of relative clause attachment ambiguities. We examine whether any individual differences in these phenomena could be predicted by language experience or general cognitive abilities (phonological ability, verbal working memory capacity, inhibitory control, and perceptual speed). We find correlations between individual differences and offline, but not online, syntactic phenomena. Condition effects on online reading time were not consistent within individuals, limiting their ability to correlate with other measures. We suggest that this might explain controversy over individual differences in language processing.

AB - There remains little consensus about whether there exist meaningful individual differences in syntactic processing and, if so, what explains them. We argue that this partially reflects the fact that few psycholinguistic studies of individual differences include multiple constructs, multiple measures per construct, or tests for reliable measures. Here, we replicated three major syntactic phenomena in the psycholinguistic literature: use of verb distributional statistics, difficulty of object- versus subject-extracted relative clauses, and resolution of relative clause attachment ambiguities. We examine whether any individual differences in these phenomena could be predicted by language experience or general cognitive abilities (phonological ability, verbal working memory capacity, inhibitory control, and perceptual speed). We find correlations between individual differences and offline, but not online, syntactic phenomena. Condition effects on online reading time were not consistent within individuals, limiting their ability to correlate with other measures. We suggest that this might explain controversy over individual differences in language processing.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85048801993&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85048801993&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jml.2018.05.006

DO - 10.1016/j.jml.2018.05.006

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85048801993

VL - 102

SP - 155

EP - 181

JO - Journal of Memory and Language

JF - Journal of Memory and Language

SN - 0749-596X

ER -