Introduction: Comparative performance management and accountability in the age of austerity

Giuseppe Grossi, Morten Balle Hansen, Jan Erik Johanson, Jarmo Vakkuri, M. Jae Moon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The five articles in this symposium examine the issues of comparative performance management and accountability in the age of austerity from different vantage points. Brusca and Montesinos carry out an international comparison of 17 countries studying key issues in the implementation of performance reporting by local governments. Using multicountry survey data, Wynen and Verhoest provide an understanding of the effect of organizational autonomy and external result control on the use of internal performance-based steering toward lower hierarchical levels in public sector organizations. Bjørnholt, Bækgaard and Houlberg study the link between fiscal austerity and politicians use of performance information by using survey and documentary data from Danish municipalities. Grossi, Reichard, and Ruggiero examine the interest of politicians and public managers in the use of performance information for decision-making and monitoring the budget cycle provided in the newly established performance budgets of municipalities in Germany and Italy. Poocharoen and Wong examine performance management in different types of interagency collaborations, presenting six case studies of management projects in the field of natural resources. Taken together, these articles deepen our understanding of the fundamental and continuing shift toward use of performance measures in the public sector in the period of austerity, with both internal and external uses of performance information.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)499-505
Number of pages7
JournalPublic Performance and Management Review
Volume39
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Jul 2

Fingerprint

responsibility
management
performance
municipality
politician
public sector
budget
Performance management
Accountability
international comparison
project management
natural resources
Italy
autonomy
manager
monitoring
decision making
Municipalities
Politicians

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Public Administration
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Grossi, Giuseppe ; Hansen, Morten Balle ; Johanson, Jan Erik ; Vakkuri, Jarmo ; Moon, M. Jae. / Introduction : Comparative performance management and accountability in the age of austerity. In: Public Performance and Management Review. 2016 ; Vol. 39, No. 3. pp. 499-505.
@article{2fc4c1318825483fa77ec561483c66a7,
title = "Introduction: Comparative performance management and accountability in the age of austerity",
abstract = "The five articles in this symposium examine the issues of comparative performance management and accountability in the age of austerity from different vantage points. Brusca and Montesinos carry out an international comparison of 17 countries studying key issues in the implementation of performance reporting by local governments. Using multicountry survey data, Wynen and Verhoest provide an understanding of the effect of organizational autonomy and external result control on the use of internal performance-based steering toward lower hierarchical levels in public sector organizations. Bj{\o}rnholt, B{\ae}kgaard and Houlberg study the link between fiscal austerity and politicians use of performance information by using survey and documentary data from Danish municipalities. Grossi, Reichard, and Ruggiero examine the interest of politicians and public managers in the use of performance information for decision-making and monitoring the budget cycle provided in the newly established performance budgets of municipalities in Germany and Italy. Poocharoen and Wong examine performance management in different types of interagency collaborations, presenting six case studies of management projects in the field of natural resources. Taken together, these articles deepen our understanding of the fundamental and continuing shift toward use of performance measures in the public sector in the period of austerity, with both internal and external uses of performance information.",
author = "Giuseppe Grossi and Hansen, {Morten Balle} and Johanson, {Jan Erik} and Jarmo Vakkuri and Moon, {M. Jae}",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/15309576.2015.1147906",
language = "English",
volume = "39",
pages = "499--505",
journal = "Public Performance & Management Review",
issn = "1530-9576",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Introduction : Comparative performance management and accountability in the age of austerity. / Grossi, Giuseppe; Hansen, Morten Balle; Johanson, Jan Erik; Vakkuri, Jarmo; Moon, M. Jae.

In: Public Performance and Management Review, Vol. 39, No. 3, 02.07.2016, p. 499-505.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Introduction

T2 - Comparative performance management and accountability in the age of austerity

AU - Grossi, Giuseppe

AU - Hansen, Morten Balle

AU - Johanson, Jan Erik

AU - Vakkuri, Jarmo

AU - Moon, M. Jae

PY - 2016/7/2

Y1 - 2016/7/2

N2 - The five articles in this symposium examine the issues of comparative performance management and accountability in the age of austerity from different vantage points. Brusca and Montesinos carry out an international comparison of 17 countries studying key issues in the implementation of performance reporting by local governments. Using multicountry survey data, Wynen and Verhoest provide an understanding of the effect of organizational autonomy and external result control on the use of internal performance-based steering toward lower hierarchical levels in public sector organizations. Bjørnholt, Bækgaard and Houlberg study the link between fiscal austerity and politicians use of performance information by using survey and documentary data from Danish municipalities. Grossi, Reichard, and Ruggiero examine the interest of politicians and public managers in the use of performance information for decision-making and monitoring the budget cycle provided in the newly established performance budgets of municipalities in Germany and Italy. Poocharoen and Wong examine performance management in different types of interagency collaborations, presenting six case studies of management projects in the field of natural resources. Taken together, these articles deepen our understanding of the fundamental and continuing shift toward use of performance measures in the public sector in the period of austerity, with both internal and external uses of performance information.

AB - The five articles in this symposium examine the issues of comparative performance management and accountability in the age of austerity from different vantage points. Brusca and Montesinos carry out an international comparison of 17 countries studying key issues in the implementation of performance reporting by local governments. Using multicountry survey data, Wynen and Verhoest provide an understanding of the effect of organizational autonomy and external result control on the use of internal performance-based steering toward lower hierarchical levels in public sector organizations. Bjørnholt, Bækgaard and Houlberg study the link between fiscal austerity and politicians use of performance information by using survey and documentary data from Danish municipalities. Grossi, Reichard, and Ruggiero examine the interest of politicians and public managers in the use of performance information for decision-making and monitoring the budget cycle provided in the newly established performance budgets of municipalities in Germany and Italy. Poocharoen and Wong examine performance management in different types of interagency collaborations, presenting six case studies of management projects in the field of natural resources. Taken together, these articles deepen our understanding of the fundamental and continuing shift toward use of performance measures in the public sector in the period of austerity, with both internal and external uses of performance information.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962280113&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962280113&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15309576.2015.1147906

DO - 10.1080/15309576.2015.1147906

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84962280113

VL - 39

SP - 499

EP - 505

JO - Public Performance & Management Review

JF - Public Performance & Management Review

SN - 1530-9576

IS - 3

ER -