Is Dominant-Side Onset Associated With a Better Motor Compensation in Parkinson's Disease?

Jee H. Ham, Jae J. Lee, Jae S. Kim, philhyu Lee, Young H. Sohn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: Unilateral onset and persistent asymmetry of motor signs are unique features of PD. The dominant hemisphere may have more efficient motor networks with greater neural reserve to cope with pathological changes. Therefore, this study compared dominant-side onset and non-dominant-side onset PD to evaluate whether dominant-side onset patients have greater neural reserve and fewer motor deficits despite similar pathological changes. Methods: We included the data of 157 consecutive, de novo PD patients with documented right-handedness who underwent dopamine transporter PET scans for an initial diagnostic workup. Among them, 118 patients with significant asymmetric motor deficits were selected for the analyses. Results: Dominant-side patients (i.e., the majority of motor deficits on the right side) showed significantly fewer motor deficits (i.e., the part III score of the UPDRS) than non-dominant-side patients (18.0±8.1 and 22.9±10.1, respectively; P=0.005). Other variables, including symptom duration and striatal dopaminergic activities, were similar between the two groups. A general linear model showed that this difference in motor deficits remained statistically significant after controlling for patient age, sex, symptom duration, and striatal dopaminergic activity in the posterior putamen (P=0.013). Conclusion: These results suggest that dominant-side patients have greater neural reserve, allowing them to better cope with PD-related pathological changes (i.e., fewer motor deficits despite similar dopamine reduction) compared to non-dominant-side patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1921-1925
Number of pages5
JournalMovement Disorders
Volume30
Issue number14
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Dec 1

Fingerprint

Parkinson Disease
Corpus Striatum
Dopamine Plasma Membrane Transport Proteins
Functional Laterality
Putamen
Positron-Emission Tomography
Linear Models
Dopamine

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Neurology
  • Clinical Neurology

Cite this

Ham, Jee H. ; Lee, Jae J. ; Kim, Jae S. ; Lee, philhyu ; Sohn, Young H. / Is Dominant-Side Onset Associated With a Better Motor Compensation in Parkinson's Disease?. In: Movement Disorders. 2015 ; Vol. 30, No. 14. pp. 1921-1925.
@article{fe96ce40c496421b950518ccf1747f99,
title = "Is Dominant-Side Onset Associated With a Better Motor Compensation in Parkinson's Disease?",
abstract = "Introduction: Unilateral onset and persistent asymmetry of motor signs are unique features of PD. The dominant hemisphere may have more efficient motor networks with greater neural reserve to cope with pathological changes. Therefore, this study compared dominant-side onset and non-dominant-side onset PD to evaluate whether dominant-side onset patients have greater neural reserve and fewer motor deficits despite similar pathological changes. Methods: We included the data of 157 consecutive, de novo PD patients with documented right-handedness who underwent dopamine transporter PET scans for an initial diagnostic workup. Among them, 118 patients with significant asymmetric motor deficits were selected for the analyses. Results: Dominant-side patients (i.e., the majority of motor deficits on the right side) showed significantly fewer motor deficits (i.e., the part III score of the UPDRS) than non-dominant-side patients (18.0±8.1 and 22.9±10.1, respectively; P=0.005). Other variables, including symptom duration and striatal dopaminergic activities, were similar between the two groups. A general linear model showed that this difference in motor deficits remained statistically significant after controlling for patient age, sex, symptom duration, and striatal dopaminergic activity in the posterior putamen (P=0.013). Conclusion: These results suggest that dominant-side patients have greater neural reserve, allowing them to better cope with PD-related pathological changes (i.e., fewer motor deficits despite similar dopamine reduction) compared to non-dominant-side patients.",
author = "Ham, {Jee H.} and Lee, {Jae J.} and Kim, {Jae S.} and philhyu Lee and Sohn, {Young H.}",
year = "2015",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/mds.26418",
language = "English",
volume = "30",
pages = "1921--1925",
journal = "Movement Disorders",
issn = "0885-3185",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "14",

}

Is Dominant-Side Onset Associated With a Better Motor Compensation in Parkinson's Disease? / Ham, Jee H.; Lee, Jae J.; Kim, Jae S.; Lee, philhyu; Sohn, Young H.

In: Movement Disorders, Vol. 30, No. 14, 01.12.2015, p. 1921-1925.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is Dominant-Side Onset Associated With a Better Motor Compensation in Parkinson's Disease?

AU - Ham, Jee H.

AU - Lee, Jae J.

AU - Kim, Jae S.

AU - Lee, philhyu

AU - Sohn, Young H.

PY - 2015/12/1

Y1 - 2015/12/1

N2 - Introduction: Unilateral onset and persistent asymmetry of motor signs are unique features of PD. The dominant hemisphere may have more efficient motor networks with greater neural reserve to cope with pathological changes. Therefore, this study compared dominant-side onset and non-dominant-side onset PD to evaluate whether dominant-side onset patients have greater neural reserve and fewer motor deficits despite similar pathological changes. Methods: We included the data of 157 consecutive, de novo PD patients with documented right-handedness who underwent dopamine transporter PET scans for an initial diagnostic workup. Among them, 118 patients with significant asymmetric motor deficits were selected for the analyses. Results: Dominant-side patients (i.e., the majority of motor deficits on the right side) showed significantly fewer motor deficits (i.e., the part III score of the UPDRS) than non-dominant-side patients (18.0±8.1 and 22.9±10.1, respectively; P=0.005). Other variables, including symptom duration and striatal dopaminergic activities, were similar between the two groups. A general linear model showed that this difference in motor deficits remained statistically significant after controlling for patient age, sex, symptom duration, and striatal dopaminergic activity in the posterior putamen (P=0.013). Conclusion: These results suggest that dominant-side patients have greater neural reserve, allowing them to better cope with PD-related pathological changes (i.e., fewer motor deficits despite similar dopamine reduction) compared to non-dominant-side patients.

AB - Introduction: Unilateral onset and persistent asymmetry of motor signs are unique features of PD. The dominant hemisphere may have more efficient motor networks with greater neural reserve to cope with pathological changes. Therefore, this study compared dominant-side onset and non-dominant-side onset PD to evaluate whether dominant-side onset patients have greater neural reserve and fewer motor deficits despite similar pathological changes. Methods: We included the data of 157 consecutive, de novo PD patients with documented right-handedness who underwent dopamine transporter PET scans for an initial diagnostic workup. Among them, 118 patients with significant asymmetric motor deficits were selected for the analyses. Results: Dominant-side patients (i.e., the majority of motor deficits on the right side) showed significantly fewer motor deficits (i.e., the part III score of the UPDRS) than non-dominant-side patients (18.0±8.1 and 22.9±10.1, respectively; P=0.005). Other variables, including symptom duration and striatal dopaminergic activities, were similar between the two groups. A general linear model showed that this difference in motor deficits remained statistically significant after controlling for patient age, sex, symptom duration, and striatal dopaminergic activity in the posterior putamen (P=0.013). Conclusion: These results suggest that dominant-side patients have greater neural reserve, allowing them to better cope with PD-related pathological changes (i.e., fewer motor deficits despite similar dopamine reduction) compared to non-dominant-side patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84955178090&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84955178090&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/mds.26418

DO - 10.1002/mds.26418

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 1921

EP - 1925

JO - Movement Disorders

JF - Movement Disorders

SN - 0885-3185

IS - 14

ER -