Is the learning curve of robotic low anterior resection shorter than laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer?

A comparative analysis of clinicopathologic outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgeries

Eun Jung Park, Chang Woo Kim, Min Soo Cho, Dong Wook Kim, Byung Soh Min, Seung Hyuk Baik, Kang Young Lee, Namkyu Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

As robotic surgery was developed with ergonomic designs, there are expectations that the technical advantages of robotic surgery can shorten the learning curve. However, there is no comparative study, so far, to evaluate the learning curve between robotic and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgeries. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare the learning curve of robotic low anterior resection (LAR) with laparoscopic LAR for rectal cancer.

Patients who underwent robotic or laparoscopic LAR by a single surgeon were compared retrospectively (robot n=89 vs laparoscopy n=89). Cumulative sum (CUSUM) was used to evaluate the learning curve. The patients were divided into phase 1 (initial learning curve period) and phase 2 (post-learning curve period). The perioperative clinicopathologic characteristics were compared by phases and surgical procedures.

According to CUSUM, the learning curve of robotic LAR was the 44th case and laparoscopic LAR was the 41st case. The learning phases were divided as follows: phase 1 (cases 1-41) versus phase 2 (cases 42-89) in the laparoscopic group, and phase 1 (cases 1-44) versus phase 2 (cases 45-89) in the robotic group. Comparison between phase 1 and phase 2 in each type of surgery showed no significant difference for the perioperative outcomes. Comparison between robotic and laparoscopic surgeries in each phase showed similar perioperative results. Pathologic outcomes were not significantly different in both procedures and phases.

The learning curve of robotic LAR for rectal cancer was similar to laparoscopic LAR, and the clinicopathologic outcomes were similar in both the procedures.

Original languageEnglish
JournalMedicine (United States)
Volume93
Issue number25
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Nov 12

Fingerprint

Learning Curve
Robotics
Rectal Neoplasms
Laparoscopy
Human Engineering
Learning

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{6989515c921049fea0df077fe31ec2df,
title = "Is the learning curve of robotic low anterior resection shorter than laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer?: A comparative analysis of clinicopathologic outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgeries",
abstract = "As robotic surgery was developed with ergonomic designs, there are expectations that the technical advantages of robotic surgery can shorten the learning curve. However, there is no comparative study, so far, to evaluate the learning curve between robotic and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgeries. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare the learning curve of robotic low anterior resection (LAR) with laparoscopic LAR for rectal cancer.Patients who underwent robotic or laparoscopic LAR by a single surgeon were compared retrospectively (robot n=89 vs laparoscopy n=89). Cumulative sum (CUSUM) was used to evaluate the learning curve. The patients were divided into phase 1 (initial learning curve period) and phase 2 (post-learning curve period). The perioperative clinicopathologic characteristics were compared by phases and surgical procedures.According to CUSUM, the learning curve of robotic LAR was the 44th case and laparoscopic LAR was the 41st case. The learning phases were divided as follows: phase 1 (cases 1-41) versus phase 2 (cases 42-89) in the laparoscopic group, and phase 1 (cases 1-44) versus phase 2 (cases 45-89) in the robotic group. Comparison between phase 1 and phase 2 in each type of surgery showed no significant difference for the perioperative outcomes. Comparison between robotic and laparoscopic surgeries in each phase showed similar perioperative results. Pathologic outcomes were not significantly different in both procedures and phases.The learning curve of robotic LAR for rectal cancer was similar to laparoscopic LAR, and the clinicopathologic outcomes were similar in both the procedures.",
author = "Park, {Eun Jung} and Kim, {Chang Woo} and Cho, {Min Soo} and Kim, {Dong Wook} and Min, {Byung Soh} and Baik, {Seung Hyuk} and Lee, {Kang Young} and Namkyu Kim",
year = "2014",
month = "11",
day = "12",
doi = "10.1097/MD.0000000000000109",
language = "English",
volume = "93",
journal = "Medicine (United States)",
issn = "0025-7974",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "25",

}

Is the learning curve of robotic low anterior resection shorter than laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer? A comparative analysis of clinicopathologic outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgeries. / Park, Eun Jung; Kim, Chang Woo; Cho, Min Soo; Kim, Dong Wook; Min, Byung Soh; Baik, Seung Hyuk; Lee, Kang Young; Kim, Namkyu.

In: Medicine (United States), Vol. 93, No. 25, 12.11.2014.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is the learning curve of robotic low anterior resection shorter than laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer?

T2 - A comparative analysis of clinicopathologic outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic surgeries

AU - Park, Eun Jung

AU - Kim, Chang Woo

AU - Cho, Min Soo

AU - Kim, Dong Wook

AU - Min, Byung Soh

AU - Baik, Seung Hyuk

AU - Lee, Kang Young

AU - Kim, Namkyu

PY - 2014/11/12

Y1 - 2014/11/12

N2 - As robotic surgery was developed with ergonomic designs, there are expectations that the technical advantages of robotic surgery can shorten the learning curve. However, there is no comparative study, so far, to evaluate the learning curve between robotic and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgeries. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare the learning curve of robotic low anterior resection (LAR) with laparoscopic LAR for rectal cancer.Patients who underwent robotic or laparoscopic LAR by a single surgeon were compared retrospectively (robot n=89 vs laparoscopy n=89). Cumulative sum (CUSUM) was used to evaluate the learning curve. The patients were divided into phase 1 (initial learning curve period) and phase 2 (post-learning curve period). The perioperative clinicopathologic characteristics were compared by phases and surgical procedures.According to CUSUM, the learning curve of robotic LAR was the 44th case and laparoscopic LAR was the 41st case. The learning phases were divided as follows: phase 1 (cases 1-41) versus phase 2 (cases 42-89) in the laparoscopic group, and phase 1 (cases 1-44) versus phase 2 (cases 45-89) in the robotic group. Comparison between phase 1 and phase 2 in each type of surgery showed no significant difference for the perioperative outcomes. Comparison between robotic and laparoscopic surgeries in each phase showed similar perioperative results. Pathologic outcomes were not significantly different in both procedures and phases.The learning curve of robotic LAR for rectal cancer was similar to laparoscopic LAR, and the clinicopathologic outcomes were similar in both the procedures.

AB - As robotic surgery was developed with ergonomic designs, there are expectations that the technical advantages of robotic surgery can shorten the learning curve. However, there is no comparative study, so far, to evaluate the learning curve between robotic and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgeries. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare the learning curve of robotic low anterior resection (LAR) with laparoscopic LAR for rectal cancer.Patients who underwent robotic or laparoscopic LAR by a single surgeon were compared retrospectively (robot n=89 vs laparoscopy n=89). Cumulative sum (CUSUM) was used to evaluate the learning curve. The patients were divided into phase 1 (initial learning curve period) and phase 2 (post-learning curve period). The perioperative clinicopathologic characteristics were compared by phases and surgical procedures.According to CUSUM, the learning curve of robotic LAR was the 44th case and laparoscopic LAR was the 41st case. The learning phases were divided as follows: phase 1 (cases 1-41) versus phase 2 (cases 42-89) in the laparoscopic group, and phase 1 (cases 1-44) versus phase 2 (cases 45-89) in the robotic group. Comparison between phase 1 and phase 2 in each type of surgery showed no significant difference for the perioperative outcomes. Comparison between robotic and laparoscopic surgeries in each phase showed similar perioperative results. Pathologic outcomes were not significantly different in both procedures and phases.The learning curve of robotic LAR for rectal cancer was similar to laparoscopic LAR, and the clinicopathologic outcomes were similar in both the procedures.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84916623267&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84916623267&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/MD.0000000000000109

DO - 10.1097/MD.0000000000000109

M3 - Article

VL - 93

JO - Medicine (United States)

JF - Medicine (United States)

SN - 0025-7974

IS - 25

ER -