Is there a deafness duration limit for cochlear implants in post-lingual deaf adults?

InSeok Moon, Sera Park, Hee Nam Kim, Won Sang Lee, Sung Huhn Kim, Jung Ha Kim, Jae Young Choi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Conclusion: Patients with post-lingual deafness should not be excluded from cochlear implantation (CI) on the basis of duration of deafness. We found that the prognosis was favorable in patients who developed deafness after adolescence, even in those with extremely long-term deafness. Objectives: CI is an effective treatment for post-lingual deafness. However, it remains unclear whether CI would benefit patients with extremely long-term deafness. We evaluated the auditory performance after CI of patients who had been deaf for more than 30 years. Methods: The study enrolled 81 adults with post-lingual deafness. Speech perception tests were performed preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively, and factors affecting the postoperative auditory performance were investigated. The subjects were divided into groups according to the duration of deafness and the postoperative speech perception scores were compared. Results: A marked improvement in the open-set speech perception scores (mono/disyllabic words and sentences) after implantation was seen in all groups, and no significant difference in the improvement in speech perception scores was observed among the groups. Age at onset of deafness was closely related to the postoperative performance, and patients who had lost their hearing before adolescence performed poorly.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)173-180
Number of pages8
JournalActa Oto-Laryngologica
Volume134
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Feb 1

Fingerprint

Cochlear Implants
Deafness
Tongue
Cochlear Implantation
Speech Perception
Age of Onset
Hearing

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Moon, InSeok ; Park, Sera ; Kim, Hee Nam ; Lee, Won Sang ; Kim, Sung Huhn ; Kim, Jung Ha ; Choi, Jae Young. / Is there a deafness duration limit for cochlear implants in post-lingual deaf adults?. In: Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 2014 ; Vol. 134, No. 2. pp. 173-180.
@article{e4a089defa614027b0bcfa2d830ca42c,
title = "Is there a deafness duration limit for cochlear implants in post-lingual deaf adults?",
abstract = "Conclusion: Patients with post-lingual deafness should not be excluded from cochlear implantation (CI) on the basis of duration of deafness. We found that the prognosis was favorable in patients who developed deafness after adolescence, even in those with extremely long-term deafness. Objectives: CI is an effective treatment for post-lingual deafness. However, it remains unclear whether CI would benefit patients with extremely long-term deafness. We evaluated the auditory performance after CI of patients who had been deaf for more than 30 years. Methods: The study enrolled 81 adults with post-lingual deafness. Speech perception tests were performed preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively, and factors affecting the postoperative auditory performance were investigated. The subjects were divided into groups according to the duration of deafness and the postoperative speech perception scores were compared. Results: A marked improvement in the open-set speech perception scores (mono/disyllabic words and sentences) after implantation was seen in all groups, and no significant difference in the improvement in speech perception scores was observed among the groups. Age at onset of deafness was closely related to the postoperative performance, and patients who had lost their hearing before adolescence performed poorly.",
author = "InSeok Moon and Sera Park and Kim, {Hee Nam} and Lee, {Won Sang} and Kim, {Sung Huhn} and Kim, {Jung Ha} and Choi, {Jae Young}",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3109/00016489.2013.850175",
language = "English",
volume = "134",
pages = "173--180",
journal = "Acta Oto-Laryngologica",
issn = "0001-6489",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "2",

}

Is there a deafness duration limit for cochlear implants in post-lingual deaf adults? / Moon, InSeok; Park, Sera; Kim, Hee Nam; Lee, Won Sang; Kim, Sung Huhn; Kim, Jung Ha; Choi, Jae Young.

In: Acta Oto-Laryngologica, Vol. 134, No. 2, 01.02.2014, p. 173-180.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is there a deafness duration limit for cochlear implants in post-lingual deaf adults?

AU - Moon, InSeok

AU - Park, Sera

AU - Kim, Hee Nam

AU - Lee, Won Sang

AU - Kim, Sung Huhn

AU - Kim, Jung Ha

AU - Choi, Jae Young

PY - 2014/2/1

Y1 - 2014/2/1

N2 - Conclusion: Patients with post-lingual deafness should not be excluded from cochlear implantation (CI) on the basis of duration of deafness. We found that the prognosis was favorable in patients who developed deafness after adolescence, even in those with extremely long-term deafness. Objectives: CI is an effective treatment for post-lingual deafness. However, it remains unclear whether CI would benefit patients with extremely long-term deafness. We evaluated the auditory performance after CI of patients who had been deaf for more than 30 years. Methods: The study enrolled 81 adults with post-lingual deafness. Speech perception tests were performed preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively, and factors affecting the postoperative auditory performance were investigated. The subjects were divided into groups according to the duration of deafness and the postoperative speech perception scores were compared. Results: A marked improvement in the open-set speech perception scores (mono/disyllabic words and sentences) after implantation was seen in all groups, and no significant difference in the improvement in speech perception scores was observed among the groups. Age at onset of deafness was closely related to the postoperative performance, and patients who had lost their hearing before adolescence performed poorly.

AB - Conclusion: Patients with post-lingual deafness should not be excluded from cochlear implantation (CI) on the basis of duration of deafness. We found that the prognosis was favorable in patients who developed deafness after adolescence, even in those with extremely long-term deafness. Objectives: CI is an effective treatment for post-lingual deafness. However, it remains unclear whether CI would benefit patients with extremely long-term deafness. We evaluated the auditory performance after CI of patients who had been deaf for more than 30 years. Methods: The study enrolled 81 adults with post-lingual deafness. Speech perception tests were performed preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively, and factors affecting the postoperative auditory performance were investigated. The subjects were divided into groups according to the duration of deafness and the postoperative speech perception scores were compared. Results: A marked improvement in the open-set speech perception scores (mono/disyllabic words and sentences) after implantation was seen in all groups, and no significant difference in the improvement in speech perception scores was observed among the groups. Age at onset of deafness was closely related to the postoperative performance, and patients who had lost their hearing before adolescence performed poorly.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892720740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892720740&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/00016489.2013.850175

DO - 10.3109/00016489.2013.850175

M3 - Article

C2 - 24286130

AN - SCOPUS:84892720740

VL - 134

SP - 173

EP - 180

JO - Acta Oto-Laryngologica

JF - Acta Oto-Laryngologica

SN - 0001-6489

IS - 2

ER -