Is there an optimal surgery time after endoscopic resection in early gastric cancer?

Moo Jung Kim, Jie-Hyun Kim, Yongchan Lee, Jong Won Kim, Seung Ho Choi, WooJin Hyung, Sung Hoon Noh, Young Hoon Youn, HyoJin Park, Sang In Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Background: The patients with early gastric cancer who have undergone incomplete endoscopic resection (ER) generally need additional surgery because of the possibility of lymph node metastasis. The aim of study was to evaluate the optimal time interval from ER to additive surgery by evaluating the effect of time interval on the surgical and oncological outcomes. Methods: We analyzed 154 patients who underwent additive gastrectomy after incomplete ER at Severance and Gangnam Severance Hospitals. The time interval point, at which operative time and estimated intraoperative blood loss (EBL) of the earlier operation group and the later operation group showed the greatest disparities, was evaluated. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the time interval point, as the earlier operation group (group A) and the later operation group (group B). We retrospectively evaluated the clinicopathological characteristics and surgical and oncological outcomes. Results: The greatest difference between operative time and EBL was in the groups who underwent operation before and after 29 days. Of the 154 patients, 78 were in group A (≤29 days) and 76 in group B (>29 days). There were no differences in the clinicopathological characteristics and oncological outcomes except for tumor size. The operative time and EBL were significantly longer and more in group A compared with group B. Conclusions: The time interval between ER and additive surgery is associated with surgical outcomes. Additive surgery at about 1 month after ER may be optimal for better surgical outcomes without affecting the oncological outcomes.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)232-239
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of Surgical Oncology
Volume21
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Stomach Neoplasms
Operative Time
Gastrectomy
Lymph Nodes
Neoplasm Metastasis
Neoplasms

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Oncology

Cite this

Kim, Moo Jung ; Kim, Jie-Hyun ; Lee, Yongchan ; Kim, Jong Won ; Choi, Seung Ho ; Hyung, WooJin ; Noh, Sung Hoon ; Youn, Young Hoon ; Park, HyoJin ; Lee, Sang In. / Is there an optimal surgery time after endoscopic resection in early gastric cancer?. In: Annals of Surgical Oncology. 2014 ; Vol. 21, No. 1. pp. 232-239.
@article{bc510d141870412cb7165f03e1ac2636,
title = "Is there an optimal surgery time after endoscopic resection in early gastric cancer?",
abstract = "Background: The patients with early gastric cancer who have undergone incomplete endoscopic resection (ER) generally need additional surgery because of the possibility of lymph node metastasis. The aim of study was to evaluate the optimal time interval from ER to additive surgery by evaluating the effect of time interval on the surgical and oncological outcomes. Methods: We analyzed 154 patients who underwent additive gastrectomy after incomplete ER at Severance and Gangnam Severance Hospitals. The time interval point, at which operative time and estimated intraoperative blood loss (EBL) of the earlier operation group and the later operation group showed the greatest disparities, was evaluated. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the time interval point, as the earlier operation group (group A) and the later operation group (group B). We retrospectively evaluated the clinicopathological characteristics and surgical and oncological outcomes. Results: The greatest difference between operative time and EBL was in the groups who underwent operation before and after 29 days. Of the 154 patients, 78 were in group A (≤29 days) and 76 in group B (>29 days). There were no differences in the clinicopathological characteristics and oncological outcomes except for tumor size. The operative time and EBL were significantly longer and more in group A compared with group B. Conclusions: The time interval between ER and additive surgery is associated with surgical outcomes. Additive surgery at about 1 month after ER may be optimal for better surgical outcomes without affecting the oncological outcomes.",
author = "Kim, {Moo Jung} and Jie-Hyun Kim and Yongchan Lee and Kim, {Jong Won} and Choi, {Seung Ho} and WooJin Hyung and Noh, {Sung Hoon} and Youn, {Young Hoon} and HyoJin Park and Lee, {Sang In}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1245/s10434-013-3299-5",
language = "English",
volume = "21",
pages = "232--239",
journal = "Annals of Surgical Oncology",
issn = "1068-9265",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

Is there an optimal surgery time after endoscopic resection in early gastric cancer? / Kim, Moo Jung; Kim, Jie-Hyun; Lee, Yongchan; Kim, Jong Won; Choi, Seung Ho; Hyung, WooJin; Noh, Sung Hoon; Youn, Young Hoon; Park, HyoJin; Lee, Sang In.

In: Annals of Surgical Oncology, Vol. 21, No. 1, 01.01.2014, p. 232-239.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Is there an optimal surgery time after endoscopic resection in early gastric cancer?

AU - Kim, Moo Jung

AU - Kim, Jie-Hyun

AU - Lee, Yongchan

AU - Kim, Jong Won

AU - Choi, Seung Ho

AU - Hyung, WooJin

AU - Noh, Sung Hoon

AU - Youn, Young Hoon

AU - Park, HyoJin

AU - Lee, Sang In

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Background: The patients with early gastric cancer who have undergone incomplete endoscopic resection (ER) generally need additional surgery because of the possibility of lymph node metastasis. The aim of study was to evaluate the optimal time interval from ER to additive surgery by evaluating the effect of time interval on the surgical and oncological outcomes. Methods: We analyzed 154 patients who underwent additive gastrectomy after incomplete ER at Severance and Gangnam Severance Hospitals. The time interval point, at which operative time and estimated intraoperative blood loss (EBL) of the earlier operation group and the later operation group showed the greatest disparities, was evaluated. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the time interval point, as the earlier operation group (group A) and the later operation group (group B). We retrospectively evaluated the clinicopathological characteristics and surgical and oncological outcomes. Results: The greatest difference between operative time and EBL was in the groups who underwent operation before and after 29 days. Of the 154 patients, 78 were in group A (≤29 days) and 76 in group B (>29 days). There were no differences in the clinicopathological characteristics and oncological outcomes except for tumor size. The operative time and EBL were significantly longer and more in group A compared with group B. Conclusions: The time interval between ER and additive surgery is associated with surgical outcomes. Additive surgery at about 1 month after ER may be optimal for better surgical outcomes without affecting the oncological outcomes.

AB - Background: The patients with early gastric cancer who have undergone incomplete endoscopic resection (ER) generally need additional surgery because of the possibility of lymph node metastasis. The aim of study was to evaluate the optimal time interval from ER to additive surgery by evaluating the effect of time interval on the surgical and oncological outcomes. Methods: We analyzed 154 patients who underwent additive gastrectomy after incomplete ER at Severance and Gangnam Severance Hospitals. The time interval point, at which operative time and estimated intraoperative blood loss (EBL) of the earlier operation group and the later operation group showed the greatest disparities, was evaluated. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the time interval point, as the earlier operation group (group A) and the later operation group (group B). We retrospectively evaluated the clinicopathological characteristics and surgical and oncological outcomes. Results: The greatest difference between operative time and EBL was in the groups who underwent operation before and after 29 days. Of the 154 patients, 78 were in group A (≤29 days) and 76 in group B (>29 days). There were no differences in the clinicopathological characteristics and oncological outcomes except for tumor size. The operative time and EBL were significantly longer and more in group A compared with group B. Conclusions: The time interval between ER and additive surgery is associated with surgical outcomes. Additive surgery at about 1 month after ER may be optimal for better surgical outcomes without affecting the oncological outcomes.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891668914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84891668914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1245/s10434-013-3299-5

DO - 10.1245/s10434-013-3299-5

M3 - Article

VL - 21

SP - 232

EP - 239

JO - Annals of Surgical Oncology

JF - Annals of Surgical Oncology

SN - 1068-9265

IS - 1

ER -