Abstract
This article examines three major characteristics-themes, research methods, and authorship-of Korean public administration research written in the Korean language during 1999 to 2009. It suggests that this research has evolved and advanced both quantitatively and qualitatively. Recent Korean scholarship can be characterized as consisting of more reform-oriented topics, more quantitative methods, and more diversified authorship. These characteristics were partially caused by increasing social demand for government reform and growing emphasis on methodological rigor in public administration research, as well as increased government research funding for graduate programs. This also concludes that the Korean public administration research has advanced greatly in past decades but needs a better thematic and methodological balance as well as balance between theoretical and prescriptive studies.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 151-167 |
Number of pages | 17 |
Journal | American Review of Public Administration |
Volume | 44 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2014 Mar |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Sociology and Political Science
- Public Administration
- Marketing
Cite this
}
Korean Public Administration Research 1999-2009 : Research Themes, Methodologies, and Scholarship. / Moon, M. Jae; Kim, Gongrok; Lee, M. Jin.
In: American Review of Public Administration, Vol. 44, No. 2, 03.2014, p. 151-167.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - Korean Public Administration Research 1999-2009
T2 - Research Themes, Methodologies, and Scholarship
AU - Moon, M. Jae
AU - Kim, Gongrok
AU - Lee, M. Jin
PY - 2014/3
Y1 - 2014/3
N2 - This article examines three major characteristics-themes, research methods, and authorship-of Korean public administration research written in the Korean language during 1999 to 2009. It suggests that this research has evolved and advanced both quantitatively and qualitatively. Recent Korean scholarship can be characterized as consisting of more reform-oriented topics, more quantitative methods, and more diversified authorship. These characteristics were partially caused by increasing social demand for government reform and growing emphasis on methodological rigor in public administration research, as well as increased government research funding for graduate programs. This also concludes that the Korean public administration research has advanced greatly in past decades but needs a better thematic and methodological balance as well as balance between theoretical and prescriptive studies.
AB - This article examines three major characteristics-themes, research methods, and authorship-of Korean public administration research written in the Korean language during 1999 to 2009. It suggests that this research has evolved and advanced both quantitatively and qualitatively. Recent Korean scholarship can be characterized as consisting of more reform-oriented topics, more quantitative methods, and more diversified authorship. These characteristics were partially caused by increasing social demand for government reform and growing emphasis on methodological rigor in public administration research, as well as increased government research funding for graduate programs. This also concludes that the Korean public administration research has advanced greatly in past decades but needs a better thematic and methodological balance as well as balance between theoretical and prescriptive studies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893601200&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893601200&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/0275074013492996
DO - 10.1177/0275074013492996
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84893601200
VL - 44
SP - 151
EP - 167
JO - American Review of Public Administration
JF - American Review of Public Administration
SN - 0275-0740
IS - 2
ER -