Korean Public Administration Research 1999-2009: Research Themes, Methodologies, and Scholarship

M. Jae Moon, Gongrok Kim, M. Jin Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article examines three major characteristics-themes, research methods, and authorship-of Korean public administration research written in the Korean language during 1999 to 2009. It suggests that this research has evolved and advanced both quantitatively and qualitatively. Recent Korean scholarship can be characterized as consisting of more reform-oriented topics, more quantitative methods, and more diversified authorship. These characteristics were partially caused by increasing social demand for government reform and growing emphasis on methodological rigor in public administration research, as well as increased government research funding for graduate programs. This also concludes that the Korean public administration research has advanced greatly in past decades but needs a better thematic and methodological balance as well as balance between theoretical and prescriptive studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)151-167
Number of pages17
JournalAmerican Review of Public Administration
Volume44
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Mar

Fingerprint

public administration
methodology
government reform
quantitative method
research method
funding
graduate
Methodology
Public Administration
reform
demand
language
Authorship
Government
Language
Research methods
Research funding
Quantitative methods

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Marketing

Cite this

@article{05af0a1ae1be4082856923c62fa0c45c,
title = "Korean Public Administration Research 1999-2009: Research Themes, Methodologies, and Scholarship",
abstract = "This article examines three major characteristics-themes, research methods, and authorship-of Korean public administration research written in the Korean language during 1999 to 2009. It suggests that this research has evolved and advanced both quantitatively and qualitatively. Recent Korean scholarship can be characterized as consisting of more reform-oriented topics, more quantitative methods, and more diversified authorship. These characteristics were partially caused by increasing social demand for government reform and growing emphasis on methodological rigor in public administration research, as well as increased government research funding for graduate programs. This also concludes that the Korean public administration research has advanced greatly in past decades but needs a better thematic and methodological balance as well as balance between theoretical and prescriptive studies.",
author = "Moon, {M. Jae} and Gongrok Kim and Lee, {M. Jin}",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
doi = "10.1177/0275074013492996",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "151--167",
journal = "American Review of Public Administration",
issn = "0275-0740",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Korean Public Administration Research 1999-2009 : Research Themes, Methodologies, and Scholarship. / Moon, M. Jae; Kim, Gongrok; Lee, M. Jin.

In: American Review of Public Administration, Vol. 44, No. 2, 03.2014, p. 151-167.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Korean Public Administration Research 1999-2009

T2 - Research Themes, Methodologies, and Scholarship

AU - Moon, M. Jae

AU - Kim, Gongrok

AU - Lee, M. Jin

PY - 2014/3

Y1 - 2014/3

N2 - This article examines three major characteristics-themes, research methods, and authorship-of Korean public administration research written in the Korean language during 1999 to 2009. It suggests that this research has evolved and advanced both quantitatively and qualitatively. Recent Korean scholarship can be characterized as consisting of more reform-oriented topics, more quantitative methods, and more diversified authorship. These characteristics were partially caused by increasing social demand for government reform and growing emphasis on methodological rigor in public administration research, as well as increased government research funding for graduate programs. This also concludes that the Korean public administration research has advanced greatly in past decades but needs a better thematic and methodological balance as well as balance between theoretical and prescriptive studies.

AB - This article examines three major characteristics-themes, research methods, and authorship-of Korean public administration research written in the Korean language during 1999 to 2009. It suggests that this research has evolved and advanced both quantitatively and qualitatively. Recent Korean scholarship can be characterized as consisting of more reform-oriented topics, more quantitative methods, and more diversified authorship. These characteristics were partially caused by increasing social demand for government reform and growing emphasis on methodological rigor in public administration research, as well as increased government research funding for graduate programs. This also concludes that the Korean public administration research has advanced greatly in past decades but needs a better thematic and methodological balance as well as balance between theoretical and prescriptive studies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893601200&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893601200&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0275074013492996

DO - 10.1177/0275074013492996

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84893601200

VL - 44

SP - 151

EP - 167

JO - American Review of Public Administration

JF - American Review of Public Administration

SN - 0275-0740

IS - 2

ER -