Korea's strategies for ICT standards internationalisation: A comparison with China's

Heejin Lee, Joon Chris Huh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Korea and China are amon. The rising challengers i. The international ICT (Information Communication and Technology) standards regime. They are attempting to internationaliz. Their home-grown technologies. As latecomer. They share similarities and displaydifferences. This paper examines two Korean cases (WIPI and WiBro), and compares with Chinese cases. Thereby it helps to conceptualize and evaluate latecomers' strategies for international standardization. Comparison o. The two countries' strategies for international standardization is useful and timely particularly considering forthcoming FTA negotiations betwee. The two countries whereTBT (technical barriers to trade) including standards becomes a critical part o. The agreement. The cases o. The two countries share some commonalities in terms of origination (local R amp; D), government leadership and motivation (reduction of royalties). Themain difference is that while Korea is oriented toward. The outside, China is toward. The inside, at least by now. Due to its hugedomestic markets and global influence, China's standards form a real threat t. The incumbent standards from traditional players like US and EU.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-13
Number of pages13
JournalInternational Journal of IT Standards and Standardization Research
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Jul 1

Fingerprint

Communication
Standardization
Technology standards
Korea
Internationalization
China
Threat
Incumbents
Commonality
Government
Technical barriers to trade
Challenger
Royalty

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

@article{9dd6c8c21860413b95d9908841420c09,
title = "Korea's strategies for ICT standards internationalisation: A comparison with China's",
abstract = "Korea and China are amon. The rising challengers i. The international ICT (Information Communication and Technology) standards regime. They are attempting to internationaliz. Their home-grown technologies. As latecomer. They share similarities and displaydifferences. This paper examines two Korean cases (WIPI and WiBro), and compares with Chinese cases. Thereby it helps to conceptualize and evaluate latecomers' strategies for international standardization. Comparison o. The two countries' strategies for international standardization is useful and timely particularly considering forthcoming FTA negotiations betwee. The two countries whereTBT (technical barriers to trade) including standards becomes a critical part o. The agreement. The cases o. The two countries share some commonalities in terms of origination (local R amp; D), government leadership and motivation (reduction of royalties). Themain difference is that while Korea is oriented toward. The outside, China is toward. The inside, at least by now. Due to its hugedomestic markets and global influence, China's standards form a real threat t. The incumbent standards from traditional players like US and EU.",
author = "Heejin Lee and Huh, {Joon Chris}",
year = "2012",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4018/jitsr.2012070101",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "1--13",
journal = "International Journal of IT Standards and Standardization Research",
issn = "1539-3062",
publisher = "IGI Publishing",
number = "2",

}

Korea's strategies for ICT standards internationalisation : A comparison with China's. / Lee, Heejin; Huh, Joon Chris.

In: International Journal of IT Standards and Standardization Research, Vol. 10, No. 2, 01.07.2012, p. 1-13.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Korea's strategies for ICT standards internationalisation

T2 - A comparison with China's

AU - Lee, Heejin

AU - Huh, Joon Chris

PY - 2012/7/1

Y1 - 2012/7/1

N2 - Korea and China are amon. The rising challengers i. The international ICT (Information Communication and Technology) standards regime. They are attempting to internationaliz. Their home-grown technologies. As latecomer. They share similarities and displaydifferences. This paper examines two Korean cases (WIPI and WiBro), and compares with Chinese cases. Thereby it helps to conceptualize and evaluate latecomers' strategies for international standardization. Comparison o. The two countries' strategies for international standardization is useful and timely particularly considering forthcoming FTA negotiations betwee. The two countries whereTBT (technical barriers to trade) including standards becomes a critical part o. The agreement. The cases o. The two countries share some commonalities in terms of origination (local R amp; D), government leadership and motivation (reduction of royalties). Themain difference is that while Korea is oriented toward. The outside, China is toward. The inside, at least by now. Due to its hugedomestic markets and global influence, China's standards form a real threat t. The incumbent standards from traditional players like US and EU.

AB - Korea and China are amon. The rising challengers i. The international ICT (Information Communication and Technology) standards regime. They are attempting to internationaliz. Their home-grown technologies. As latecomer. They share similarities and displaydifferences. This paper examines two Korean cases (WIPI and WiBro), and compares with Chinese cases. Thereby it helps to conceptualize and evaluate latecomers' strategies for international standardization. Comparison o. The two countries' strategies for international standardization is useful and timely particularly considering forthcoming FTA negotiations betwee. The two countries whereTBT (technical barriers to trade) including standards becomes a critical part o. The agreement. The cases o. The two countries share some commonalities in terms of origination (local R amp; D), government leadership and motivation (reduction of royalties). Themain difference is that while Korea is oriented toward. The outside, China is toward. The inside, at least by now. Due to its hugedomestic markets and global influence, China's standards form a real threat t. The incumbent standards from traditional players like US and EU.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84876590741&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84876590741&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4018/jitsr.2012070101

DO - 10.4018/jitsr.2012070101

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84876590741

VL - 10

SP - 1

EP - 13

JO - International Journal of IT Standards and Standardization Research

JF - International Journal of IT Standards and Standardization Research

SN - 1539-3062

IS - 2

ER -