Latecomer Strategies: Evidence from the Semiconductor Industry in Japan and Korea

Dong Sung Cho, Dong-Jae Kim, Dong Kee Rhee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

144 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The effects of strategic order of entry on firms' performance have long been an issue in many areas of study. Past research efforts, however, have been concentrated mostly on first mover or early entrant advantages. To contribute to developing a theory of latecomer strategies, the authors investigate how late- comers compete successfully or even leapfrog early movers. They review previous studies on early mover advantages and disadvantages, and group the sources of such advantages or disadvantages into three areas: the firm, its market, and its competitors. The theoretical focus is how a firm converts the opportunities stemming from entry order into performance. The authors seek to confirm and extend relevant theories by examining how late entrants have caught up with incumbent industry leaders in the global semiconductor industry. On the basis of in-depth case analysis of three Japanese and three Korean semiconductor companies, they identify and categorize successful latecomer strategies into two types: strategies for overcoming latecomer disadvantages and strategies for utilizing latecomer advantages. Focusing, thin margin or loss bearing, and volume building form the essence of strategies for overcoming disadvantages, whereas odd timing, time compression, human- embodied technology transfer, benchmarking, technological leapfrogging, and resource leveraging form the essence of strategies for utilizing advantages. Because many companies in Asia have had to face the reality of being latecomers, the Asian perspectives are particularly useful for studying and explicating latecomer strategies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)489-505
Number of pages17
JournalOrganization Science
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1998 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Semiconductor materials
Industry
Bearings (structural)
Technology transfer
Benchmarking
Semiconductor industry
Japan
Korea
Disadvantage
Asia

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Strategy and Management
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Management of Technology and Innovation

Cite this

@article{8f9c874cd4f44488851905e8f2895064,
title = "Latecomer Strategies: Evidence from the Semiconductor Industry in Japan and Korea",
abstract = "The effects of strategic order of entry on firms' performance have long been an issue in many areas of study. Past research efforts, however, have been concentrated mostly on first mover or early entrant advantages. To contribute to developing a theory of latecomer strategies, the authors investigate how late- comers compete successfully or even leapfrog early movers. They review previous studies on early mover advantages and disadvantages, and group the sources of such advantages or disadvantages into three areas: the firm, its market, and its competitors. The theoretical focus is how a firm converts the opportunities stemming from entry order into performance. The authors seek to confirm and extend relevant theories by examining how late entrants have caught up with incumbent industry leaders in the global semiconductor industry. On the basis of in-depth case analysis of three Japanese and three Korean semiconductor companies, they identify and categorize successful latecomer strategies into two types: strategies for overcoming latecomer disadvantages and strategies for utilizing latecomer advantages. Focusing, thin margin or loss bearing, and volume building form the essence of strategies for overcoming disadvantages, whereas odd timing, time compression, human- embodied technology transfer, benchmarking, technological leapfrogging, and resource leveraging form the essence of strategies for utilizing advantages. Because many companies in Asia have had to face the reality of being latecomers, the Asian perspectives are particularly useful for studying and explicating latecomer strategies.",
author = "Cho, {Dong Sung} and Dong-Jae Kim and Rhee, {Dong Kee}",
year = "1998",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1287/orsc.9.4.489",
language = "English",
volume = "9",
pages = "489--505",
journal = "Organization Science",
issn = "1047-7039",
publisher = "INFORMS Inst.for Operations Res.and the Management Sciences",
number = "4",

}

Latecomer Strategies : Evidence from the Semiconductor Industry in Japan and Korea. / Cho, Dong Sung; Kim, Dong-Jae; Rhee, Dong Kee.

In: Organization Science, Vol. 9, No. 4, 01.01.1998, p. 489-505.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Latecomer Strategies

T2 - Evidence from the Semiconductor Industry in Japan and Korea

AU - Cho, Dong Sung

AU - Kim, Dong-Jae

AU - Rhee, Dong Kee

PY - 1998/1/1

Y1 - 1998/1/1

N2 - The effects of strategic order of entry on firms' performance have long been an issue in many areas of study. Past research efforts, however, have been concentrated mostly on first mover or early entrant advantages. To contribute to developing a theory of latecomer strategies, the authors investigate how late- comers compete successfully or even leapfrog early movers. They review previous studies on early mover advantages and disadvantages, and group the sources of such advantages or disadvantages into three areas: the firm, its market, and its competitors. The theoretical focus is how a firm converts the opportunities stemming from entry order into performance. The authors seek to confirm and extend relevant theories by examining how late entrants have caught up with incumbent industry leaders in the global semiconductor industry. On the basis of in-depth case analysis of three Japanese and three Korean semiconductor companies, they identify and categorize successful latecomer strategies into two types: strategies for overcoming latecomer disadvantages and strategies for utilizing latecomer advantages. Focusing, thin margin or loss bearing, and volume building form the essence of strategies for overcoming disadvantages, whereas odd timing, time compression, human- embodied technology transfer, benchmarking, technological leapfrogging, and resource leveraging form the essence of strategies for utilizing advantages. Because many companies in Asia have had to face the reality of being latecomers, the Asian perspectives are particularly useful for studying and explicating latecomer strategies.

AB - The effects of strategic order of entry on firms' performance have long been an issue in many areas of study. Past research efforts, however, have been concentrated mostly on first mover or early entrant advantages. To contribute to developing a theory of latecomer strategies, the authors investigate how late- comers compete successfully or even leapfrog early movers. They review previous studies on early mover advantages and disadvantages, and group the sources of such advantages or disadvantages into three areas: the firm, its market, and its competitors. The theoretical focus is how a firm converts the opportunities stemming from entry order into performance. The authors seek to confirm and extend relevant theories by examining how late entrants have caught up with incumbent industry leaders in the global semiconductor industry. On the basis of in-depth case analysis of three Japanese and three Korean semiconductor companies, they identify and categorize successful latecomer strategies into two types: strategies for overcoming latecomer disadvantages and strategies for utilizing latecomer advantages. Focusing, thin margin or loss bearing, and volume building form the essence of strategies for overcoming disadvantages, whereas odd timing, time compression, human- embodied technology transfer, benchmarking, technological leapfrogging, and resource leveraging form the essence of strategies for utilizing advantages. Because many companies in Asia have had to face the reality of being latecomers, the Asian perspectives are particularly useful for studying and explicating latecomer strategies.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0032355290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0032355290&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1287/orsc.9.4.489

DO - 10.1287/orsc.9.4.489

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0032355290

VL - 9

SP - 489

EP - 505

JO - Organization Science

JF - Organization Science

SN - 1047-7039

IS - 4

ER -