Learning by Reviewing

Kwangsu Cho, Charles MacArthur

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

67 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Peer review of writing provides an alternative to the traditional approach of practicing writing with feedback from an instructor. Most of the limited research on peer review has examined the general effects or focused on the effects of receiving feedback from peers. The current study focused on the effects of giving feedback, that is, on whether students learn to write better by reviewing peer writing. Sixty-one undergraduate students were randomly assigned to reviewing, reading, or no-treatment control conditions. Reviewers rated and commented on papers written by peers. Readers read the same papers without commenting. All students then wrote a paper in the same genre but on a different topic. Students in the reviewing condition significantly outperformed those in both other conditions on the quality of the report. Follow-up analysis indicated that comments coded as " problem detection" and " solution suggestion" were positively correlated with writing outcomes for students in the reviewing condition. This research provides support for the use of peer review of writing as a learning activity.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)73-84
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Educational Psychology
Volume103
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Feb 24

Fingerprint

Learning
Students
peer review
Peer Review
learning
student
Research Peer Review
Reading
genre
instructor
Research
Therapeutics

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Cite this

Cho, Kwangsu ; MacArthur, Charles. / Learning by Reviewing. In: Journal of Educational Psychology. 2011 ; Vol. 103, No. 1. pp. 73-84.
@article{6748097e48f64791b35fccebf69df9d9,
title = "Learning by Reviewing",
abstract = "Peer review of writing provides an alternative to the traditional approach of practicing writing with feedback from an instructor. Most of the limited research on peer review has examined the general effects or focused on the effects of receiving feedback from peers. The current study focused on the effects of giving feedback, that is, on whether students learn to write better by reviewing peer writing. Sixty-one undergraduate students were randomly assigned to reviewing, reading, or no-treatment control conditions. Reviewers rated and commented on papers written by peers. Readers read the same papers without commenting. All students then wrote a paper in the same genre but on a different topic. Students in the reviewing condition significantly outperformed those in both other conditions on the quality of the report. Follow-up analysis indicated that comments coded as {"} problem detection{"} and {"} solution suggestion{"} were positively correlated with writing outcomes for students in the reviewing condition. This research provides support for the use of peer review of writing as a learning activity.",
author = "Kwangsu Cho and Charles MacArthur",
year = "2011",
month = "2",
day = "24",
doi = "10.1037/a0021950",
language = "English",
volume = "103",
pages = "73--84",
journal = "Journal of Educational Psychology",
issn = "0022-0663",
publisher = "American Psychological Association Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Cho, K & MacArthur, C 2011, 'Learning by Reviewing', Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 103, no. 1, pp. 73-84. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021950

Learning by Reviewing. / Cho, Kwangsu; MacArthur, Charles.

In: Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 103, No. 1, 24.02.2011, p. 73-84.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Learning by Reviewing

AU - Cho, Kwangsu

AU - MacArthur, Charles

PY - 2011/2/24

Y1 - 2011/2/24

N2 - Peer review of writing provides an alternative to the traditional approach of practicing writing with feedback from an instructor. Most of the limited research on peer review has examined the general effects or focused on the effects of receiving feedback from peers. The current study focused on the effects of giving feedback, that is, on whether students learn to write better by reviewing peer writing. Sixty-one undergraduate students were randomly assigned to reviewing, reading, or no-treatment control conditions. Reviewers rated and commented on papers written by peers. Readers read the same papers without commenting. All students then wrote a paper in the same genre but on a different topic. Students in the reviewing condition significantly outperformed those in both other conditions on the quality of the report. Follow-up analysis indicated that comments coded as " problem detection" and " solution suggestion" were positively correlated with writing outcomes for students in the reviewing condition. This research provides support for the use of peer review of writing as a learning activity.

AB - Peer review of writing provides an alternative to the traditional approach of practicing writing with feedback from an instructor. Most of the limited research on peer review has examined the general effects or focused on the effects of receiving feedback from peers. The current study focused on the effects of giving feedback, that is, on whether students learn to write better by reviewing peer writing. Sixty-one undergraduate students were randomly assigned to reviewing, reading, or no-treatment control conditions. Reviewers rated and commented on papers written by peers. Readers read the same papers without commenting. All students then wrote a paper in the same genre but on a different topic. Students in the reviewing condition significantly outperformed those in both other conditions on the quality of the report. Follow-up analysis indicated that comments coded as " problem detection" and " solution suggestion" were positively correlated with writing outcomes for students in the reviewing condition. This research provides support for the use of peer review of writing as a learning activity.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79951779106&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79951779106&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1037/a0021950

DO - 10.1037/a0021950

M3 - Article

VL - 103

SP - 73

EP - 84

JO - Journal of Educational Psychology

JF - Journal of Educational Psychology

SN - 0022-0663

IS - 1

ER -