Linking Decision-Making Procedures to Decision Acceptance and Citizen Voice: Evidence From Two Studies

Gregory A. Porumbescu, Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Government decision-making procedures and transparency ensure responsive governance. Yet, there are few attempts to assess how these two factors shape citizens’ intentions to voice opposition to government decisions. We predict that the effect of decision-making procedures on voice is contingent upon the fairness of government decision-making procedures. We also hypothesize that the strength of this effect will vary according to how transparent the decision-making process is. We test these hypotheses using two survey experiments, where we assess how the effect of procedural fairness of a decision-making process on citizen voice varies according to the level of transparency. Findings reveal that participants are least inclined to voice opposition when a decision-making process is fair and transparency high. However, when a decision-making process is unfair, greater transparency did not increase voice. We conclude that transparency can stifle voice for fair decision-making procedures but does not stimulate voice when decision-making procedures are unfair.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)902-914
Number of pages13
JournalAmerican Review of Public Administration
Volume48
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Nov 1

Fingerprint

transparency
acceptance
decision-making process
citizen
decision making
evidence
fairness
opposition
Acceptance
Decision making
governance
experiment
Transparency
Decision-making process
Government

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration
  • Marketing

Cite this

@article{7953644e57554d51841181dc01894a22,
title = "Linking Decision-Making Procedures to Decision Acceptance and Citizen Voice: Evidence From Two Studies",
abstract = "Government decision-making procedures and transparency ensure responsive governance. Yet, there are few attempts to assess how these two factors shape citizens’ intentions to voice opposition to government decisions. We predict that the effect of decision-making procedures on voice is contingent upon the fairness of government decision-making procedures. We also hypothesize that the strength of this effect will vary according to how transparent the decision-making process is. We test these hypotheses using two survey experiments, where we assess how the effect of procedural fairness of a decision-making process on citizen voice varies according to the level of transparency. Findings reveal that participants are least inclined to voice opposition when a decision-making process is fair and transparency high. However, when a decision-making process is unfair, greater transparency did not increase voice. We conclude that transparency can stifle voice for fair decision-making procedures but does not stimulate voice when decision-making procedures are unfair.",
author = "Porumbescu, {Gregory A.} and Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0275074017734642",
language = "English",
volume = "48",
pages = "902--914",
journal = "American Review of Public Administration",
issn = "0275-0740",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "8",

}

Linking Decision-Making Procedures to Decision Acceptance and Citizen Voice : Evidence From Two Studies. / Porumbescu, Gregory A.; Grimmelikhuijsen, Stephan.

In: American Review of Public Administration, Vol. 48, No. 8, 01.11.2018, p. 902-914.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Linking Decision-Making Procedures to Decision Acceptance and Citizen Voice

T2 - Evidence From Two Studies

AU - Porumbescu, Gregory A.

AU - Grimmelikhuijsen, Stephan

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - Government decision-making procedures and transparency ensure responsive governance. Yet, there are few attempts to assess how these two factors shape citizens’ intentions to voice opposition to government decisions. We predict that the effect of decision-making procedures on voice is contingent upon the fairness of government decision-making procedures. We also hypothesize that the strength of this effect will vary according to how transparent the decision-making process is. We test these hypotheses using two survey experiments, where we assess how the effect of procedural fairness of a decision-making process on citizen voice varies according to the level of transparency. Findings reveal that participants are least inclined to voice opposition when a decision-making process is fair and transparency high. However, when a decision-making process is unfair, greater transparency did not increase voice. We conclude that transparency can stifle voice for fair decision-making procedures but does not stimulate voice when decision-making procedures are unfair.

AB - Government decision-making procedures and transparency ensure responsive governance. Yet, there are few attempts to assess how these two factors shape citizens’ intentions to voice opposition to government decisions. We predict that the effect of decision-making procedures on voice is contingent upon the fairness of government decision-making procedures. We also hypothesize that the strength of this effect will vary according to how transparent the decision-making process is. We test these hypotheses using two survey experiments, where we assess how the effect of procedural fairness of a decision-making process on citizen voice varies according to the level of transparency. Findings reveal that participants are least inclined to voice opposition when a decision-making process is fair and transparency high. However, when a decision-making process is unfair, greater transparency did not increase voice. We conclude that transparency can stifle voice for fair decision-making procedures but does not stimulate voice when decision-making procedures are unfair.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054185907&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054185907&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0275074017734642

DO - 10.1177/0275074017734642

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85054185907

VL - 48

SP - 902

EP - 914

JO - American Review of Public Administration

JF - American Review of Public Administration

SN - 0275-0740

IS - 8

ER -