Liquid CO2 Fracturing: Effect of Fluid Permeation on the Breakdown Pressure and Cracking Behavior

Seong Jun Ha, Jinhyun Choo, Tae Sup Yun

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Liquid CO2 fracturing is a promising alternative to hydraulic fracturing since it can circumvent problems stemming from the use of water. One of the most significant differences between liquid CO2 and hydraulic fracturing processes is that liquid CO2 permeates into matrix pores very rapidly due to its low viscosity. Here we study how this rapid permeation of liquid CO2 impacts a range of features during the course of the fracturing process, with a focus on the breakdown pressure and cracking behavior. We first conduct a series of laboratory fracturing experiments that inject liquid CO2, water, and oil into nominally identical mortar specimens with various pressurization rates. We quantitatively measure the volumes of fluids permeated into the specimens and investigate how these permeated volumes are related to breakdown and fracture initiation pressures and pressurization efficiency. The morphology of the fractures generated by different types of fluids is also examined using 3D X-ray computed tomographic imaging. Subsequently, the cracking processes due to injection of liquid CO2 and water are further investigated by numerical simulations employing a phase-field approach to fracture in porous media. Simulation results show that rapid permeation of liquid CO2 gives rise to a substantial pore pressure buildup and distributed microcracks prior to the major fracture propagation stage. The experimental and numerical results commonly indicate that significant fluid permeation during liquid CO2 fracturing is a primary reason for its lower breakdown pressure and more distributed fractures compared with hydraulic fracturing.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3407-3420
Number of pages14
JournalRock Mechanics and Rock Engineering
Volume51
Issue number11
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Nov 1

Fingerprint

Permeation
liquid
Fluids
fluid
Liquids
Hydraulic fracturing
Pressurization
Fracturing (fossil fuel deposits)
fracture initiation
Water
fracture propagation
effect
cracking (fracture)
mortar
microcrack
Pore pressure
Microcracks
Mortar
water
pore pressure

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
  • Geology

Cite this

@article{888e3142cdc44db7aaa4c7a09104242d,
title = "Liquid CO2 Fracturing: Effect of Fluid Permeation on the Breakdown Pressure and Cracking Behavior",
abstract = "Liquid CO2 fracturing is a promising alternative to hydraulic fracturing since it can circumvent problems stemming from the use of water. One of the most significant differences between liquid CO2 and hydraulic fracturing processes is that liquid CO2 permeates into matrix pores very rapidly due to its low viscosity. Here we study how this rapid permeation of liquid CO2 impacts a range of features during the course of the fracturing process, with a focus on the breakdown pressure and cracking behavior. We first conduct a series of laboratory fracturing experiments that inject liquid CO2, water, and oil into nominally identical mortar specimens with various pressurization rates. We quantitatively measure the volumes of fluids permeated into the specimens and investigate how these permeated volumes are related to breakdown and fracture initiation pressures and pressurization efficiency. The morphology of the fractures generated by different types of fluids is also examined using 3D X-ray computed tomographic imaging. Subsequently, the cracking processes due to injection of liquid CO2 and water are further investigated by numerical simulations employing a phase-field approach to fracture in porous media. Simulation results show that rapid permeation of liquid CO2 gives rise to a substantial pore pressure buildup and distributed microcracks prior to the major fracture propagation stage. The experimental and numerical results commonly indicate that significant fluid permeation during liquid CO2 fracturing is a primary reason for its lower breakdown pressure and more distributed fractures compared with hydraulic fracturing.",
author = "Ha, {Seong Jun} and Jinhyun Choo and Yun, {Tae Sup}",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00603-018-1542-x",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "3407--3420",
journal = "Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering",
issn = "0723-2632",
publisher = "Springer Wien",
number = "11",

}

Liquid CO2 Fracturing : Effect of Fluid Permeation on the Breakdown Pressure and Cracking Behavior. / Ha, Seong Jun; Choo, Jinhyun; Yun, Tae Sup.

In: Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, Vol. 51, No. 11, 01.11.2018, p. 3407-3420.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Liquid CO2 Fracturing

T2 - Effect of Fluid Permeation on the Breakdown Pressure and Cracking Behavior

AU - Ha, Seong Jun

AU - Choo, Jinhyun

AU - Yun, Tae Sup

PY - 2018/11/1

Y1 - 2018/11/1

N2 - Liquid CO2 fracturing is a promising alternative to hydraulic fracturing since it can circumvent problems stemming from the use of water. One of the most significant differences between liquid CO2 and hydraulic fracturing processes is that liquid CO2 permeates into matrix pores very rapidly due to its low viscosity. Here we study how this rapid permeation of liquid CO2 impacts a range of features during the course of the fracturing process, with a focus on the breakdown pressure and cracking behavior. We first conduct a series of laboratory fracturing experiments that inject liquid CO2, water, and oil into nominally identical mortar specimens with various pressurization rates. We quantitatively measure the volumes of fluids permeated into the specimens and investigate how these permeated volumes are related to breakdown and fracture initiation pressures and pressurization efficiency. The morphology of the fractures generated by different types of fluids is also examined using 3D X-ray computed tomographic imaging. Subsequently, the cracking processes due to injection of liquid CO2 and water are further investigated by numerical simulations employing a phase-field approach to fracture in porous media. Simulation results show that rapid permeation of liquid CO2 gives rise to a substantial pore pressure buildup and distributed microcracks prior to the major fracture propagation stage. The experimental and numerical results commonly indicate that significant fluid permeation during liquid CO2 fracturing is a primary reason for its lower breakdown pressure and more distributed fractures compared with hydraulic fracturing.

AB - Liquid CO2 fracturing is a promising alternative to hydraulic fracturing since it can circumvent problems stemming from the use of water. One of the most significant differences between liquid CO2 and hydraulic fracturing processes is that liquid CO2 permeates into matrix pores very rapidly due to its low viscosity. Here we study how this rapid permeation of liquid CO2 impacts a range of features during the course of the fracturing process, with a focus on the breakdown pressure and cracking behavior. We first conduct a series of laboratory fracturing experiments that inject liquid CO2, water, and oil into nominally identical mortar specimens with various pressurization rates. We quantitatively measure the volumes of fluids permeated into the specimens and investigate how these permeated volumes are related to breakdown and fracture initiation pressures and pressurization efficiency. The morphology of the fractures generated by different types of fluids is also examined using 3D X-ray computed tomographic imaging. Subsequently, the cracking processes due to injection of liquid CO2 and water are further investigated by numerical simulations employing a phase-field approach to fracture in porous media. Simulation results show that rapid permeation of liquid CO2 gives rise to a substantial pore pressure buildup and distributed microcracks prior to the major fracture propagation stage. The experimental and numerical results commonly indicate that significant fluid permeation during liquid CO2 fracturing is a primary reason for its lower breakdown pressure and more distributed fractures compared with hydraulic fracturing.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049570613&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049570613&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00603-018-1542-x

DO - 10.1007/s00603-018-1542-x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85049570613

VL - 51

SP - 3407

EP - 3420

JO - Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering

JF - Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering

SN - 0723-2632

IS - 11

ER -