Long-term safety and effectiveness of unprotected left main coronary stenting with drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents

Young Hak Kim, Duk Woo Park, Seung Whan Lee, Sung Cheol Yun, Cheol Whan Lee, Myeong Ki Hong, Seong Wook Park, Ki Bae Seung, Hyeon Cheol Gwon, Myung Ho Jeong, Yangsoo Jang, Hyo Soo Kim, In Whan Seong, Hun Sik Park, Taehoon Ahn, In Ho Chae, Seung Jea Tahk, Wook Sung Chung, Seung Jung Park

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

73 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND - Limited information is available on long-term outcomes for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery disease who received drug-eluting stents (DES). METHODS AND RESULTS - In the multicenter registry evaluating outcomes among patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis undergoing stenting with either bare metal stents (BMS) or DES, 1217 consecutive patients were divided into 2 groups: 353 who received only BMS and 864 who received at least 1 DES. The 3-year outcomes were compared by use of the adjustment of inverse-probability-of-treatment-weighted method. Patients receiving DES were older and had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and multivessel disease. In the overall population, with the use of DES, the 3-year adjusted risk of death (8.0% versus 9.5%; hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.36 to 1.40; P=0.976) or death or myocardial infarction (14.3% versus 14.9%; hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.49 to 1.40; P=0.479) was similar compared with BMS. However, the risk of target lesion revascularization was significantly lower with the use of DES than BMS (5.4% versus 12.1%; hazard ratio, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.22 to 0.73; P=0.003). When patients were classified according to lesion location, DES was still associated with lower risk of target lesion revascularization in patients with bifurcation (6.9% versus 16.3%; hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% confidence interval, 0.18 to 0.78; P=0.009) or nonbifurcation (3.4% versus 10.3%; hazard ratio, 0.39; 95% confidence interval, 0.17 to 0.88; P=0.024) lesions with a comparable risk of death or myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS - Compared with BMS, DES was associated with a reduction in the need for repeat revascularization without increasing the risk of death or myocardial infarction for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery stenosis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)400-407
Number of pages8
JournalCirculation
Volume120
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Aug

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Physiology (medical)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Long-term safety and effectiveness of unprotected left main coronary stenting with drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Kim, Y. H., Park, D. W., Lee, S. W., Yun, S. C., Lee, C. W., Hong, M. K., Park, S. W., Seung, K. B., Gwon, H. C., Jeong, M. H., Jang, Y., Kim, H. S., Seong, I. W., Park, H. S., Ahn, T., Chae, I. H., Tahk, S. J., Chung, W. S., & Park, S. J. (2009). Long-term safety and effectiveness of unprotected left main coronary stenting with drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents. Circulation, 120(5), 400-407. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.800805