Loop diathermy and cold-knife conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a comparative study.

Y. T. Kim, J. W. Kim, D. K. Kim, C. H. Song

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

One hundred and sixty-eight cases of cervical conization were performed for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in a 32-month study. The indications for conization were unsatisfactory colposcopic finding, abnormal epithelium that extended into the endocervical canal, a microinvasive cervical cancer, and significant discrepancy among cytology, colposcopy, and/or punch biopsy histology. In the early period of the study, conization was done by the cold-knife method (N = 107), whereas loop diathermy was used in the latter part of the study (N = 61). Both groups were similar in terms of age, indications for conization, and size of cervical cone specimens. Loop diathermy conization was done in a significantly shorter time (5.7 +/- 1.8 minute vs 15.2 +/- 6.1 minute)(P < 0.05) than cold-knife conization. However, the difference in the postoperative complications between loop diathermy(3.0%) and cold-knife conization(4.7%) was not significant. The incidence rate of residual CIN III lesions in the subsequent hysterectomy specimens, found by histological documentation on these specimens was 25.0 and 26.1 percent after loop diathermy and cold-knife conization respectively. These results suggest that loop diathermy is much easier to perform and a more time-conserving treatment modality than cold-knife conization in the management of patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)281-286
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Korean medical science
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1995 Aug

Fingerprint

Conization
Diathermy
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
Colposcopy
Hysterectomy
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
Documentation
Cell Biology
Histology
Epithelium
Biopsy

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{8ecc1d6f16534b4c803cf3573eeef1ee,
title = "Loop diathermy and cold-knife conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a comparative study.",
abstract = "One hundred and sixty-eight cases of cervical conization were performed for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in a 32-month study. The indications for conization were unsatisfactory colposcopic finding, abnormal epithelium that extended into the endocervical canal, a microinvasive cervical cancer, and significant discrepancy among cytology, colposcopy, and/or punch biopsy histology. In the early period of the study, conization was done by the cold-knife method (N = 107), whereas loop diathermy was used in the latter part of the study (N = 61). Both groups were similar in terms of age, indications for conization, and size of cervical cone specimens. Loop diathermy conization was done in a significantly shorter time (5.7 +/- 1.8 minute vs 15.2 +/- 6.1 minute)(P < 0.05) than cold-knife conization. However, the difference in the postoperative complications between loop diathermy(3.0{\%}) and cold-knife conization(4.7{\%}) was not significant. The incidence rate of residual CIN III lesions in the subsequent hysterectomy specimens, found by histological documentation on these specimens was 25.0 and 26.1 percent after loop diathermy and cold-knife conization respectively. These results suggest that loop diathermy is much easier to perform and a more time-conserving treatment modality than cold-knife conization in the management of patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.",
author = "Kim, {Y. T.} and Kim, {J. W.} and Kim, {D. K.} and Song, {C. H.}",
year = "1995",
month = "8",
doi = "10.3346/jkms.1995.10.4.281",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "281--286",
journal = "Journal of Korean Medical Science",
issn = "1011-8934",
publisher = "Korean Academy of Medical Science",
number = "4",

}

Loop diathermy and cold-knife conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia : a comparative study. / Kim, Y. T.; Kim, J. W.; Kim, D. K.; Song, C. H.

In: Journal of Korean medical science, Vol. 10, No. 4, 08.1995, p. 281-286.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Loop diathermy and cold-knife conization in patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

T2 - a comparative study.

AU - Kim, Y. T.

AU - Kim, J. W.

AU - Kim, D. K.

AU - Song, C. H.

PY - 1995/8

Y1 - 1995/8

N2 - One hundred and sixty-eight cases of cervical conization were performed for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in a 32-month study. The indications for conization were unsatisfactory colposcopic finding, abnormal epithelium that extended into the endocervical canal, a microinvasive cervical cancer, and significant discrepancy among cytology, colposcopy, and/or punch biopsy histology. In the early period of the study, conization was done by the cold-knife method (N = 107), whereas loop diathermy was used in the latter part of the study (N = 61). Both groups were similar in terms of age, indications for conization, and size of cervical cone specimens. Loop diathermy conization was done in a significantly shorter time (5.7 +/- 1.8 minute vs 15.2 +/- 6.1 minute)(P < 0.05) than cold-knife conization. However, the difference in the postoperative complications between loop diathermy(3.0%) and cold-knife conization(4.7%) was not significant. The incidence rate of residual CIN III lesions in the subsequent hysterectomy specimens, found by histological documentation on these specimens was 25.0 and 26.1 percent after loop diathermy and cold-knife conization respectively. These results suggest that loop diathermy is much easier to perform and a more time-conserving treatment modality than cold-knife conization in the management of patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

AB - One hundred and sixty-eight cases of cervical conization were performed for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in a 32-month study. The indications for conization were unsatisfactory colposcopic finding, abnormal epithelium that extended into the endocervical canal, a microinvasive cervical cancer, and significant discrepancy among cytology, colposcopy, and/or punch biopsy histology. In the early period of the study, conization was done by the cold-knife method (N = 107), whereas loop diathermy was used in the latter part of the study (N = 61). Both groups were similar in terms of age, indications for conization, and size of cervical cone specimens. Loop diathermy conization was done in a significantly shorter time (5.7 +/- 1.8 minute vs 15.2 +/- 6.1 minute)(P < 0.05) than cold-knife conization. However, the difference in the postoperative complications between loop diathermy(3.0%) and cold-knife conization(4.7%) was not significant. The incidence rate of residual CIN III lesions in the subsequent hysterectomy specimens, found by histological documentation on these specimens was 25.0 and 26.1 percent after loop diathermy and cold-knife conization respectively. These results suggest that loop diathermy is much easier to perform and a more time-conserving treatment modality than cold-knife conization in the management of patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0029349437&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0029349437&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3346/jkms.1995.10.4.281

DO - 10.3346/jkms.1995.10.4.281

M3 - Article

C2 - 8593209

AN - SCOPUS:0029349437

VL - 10

SP - 281

EP - 286

JO - Journal of Korean Medical Science

JF - Journal of Korean Medical Science

SN - 1011-8934

IS - 4

ER -