Lower-fluence, higher-density versus higher-fluence, lower-density treatment with a 10,600-nm carbon dioxide fractional laser system: A split-face, evaluator-blinded study

Jin Young Jung, Ju Hee Lee, Dong Jin Ryu, Sang Ju Lee, Dongsik Bang, Sung Bin Cho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

29 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Adequate laser settings in the treatment of scars using a carbon dioxide fractional laser system (CO2 FS) have not been established. Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of low-fluence, high-density with high-fluence, low-density treatment with CO2 FS on acne scars and enlarged pores. Methods Ten patients with mild to severe atrophic acne scars and enlarged pores were enrolled. Half of each subject's face was treated with a single session of CO2 FS with a fluence of 70 mJ and a density of 150 spots/cm2; the other half was treated with a fluence of 30 mJ and a density of 250 spots/cm2. Results Follow-up results 3 months after a single low-fluence, high-density treatment with CO2 FS showed that four of 10 participants had clinical improvement of 51% to 75% from baseline. After the high-fluence, low-density CO2 FS treatment, five of 10 patients demonstrated marked clinical improvements of more than 76%. Conclusion Higher-energy, lower-density laser settings seem to be more effective than lower-energy, higher-density settings for acne scars and enlarged pores, although our results do not constitute a conclusive comparison of the two different modes of CO2 FS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2022-2029
Number of pages8
JournalDermatologic Surgery
Volume36
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Dec 1

Fingerprint

Gas Lasers
Cicatrix
Acne Vulgaris
Lasers
Therapeutics
Safety

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Dermatology

Cite this

@article{b9c7c00a3da246258b0c796f27fbc4f8,
title = "Lower-fluence, higher-density versus higher-fluence, lower-density treatment with a 10,600-nm carbon dioxide fractional laser system: A split-face, evaluator-blinded study",
abstract = "Background Adequate laser settings in the treatment of scars using a carbon dioxide fractional laser system (CO2 FS) have not been established. Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of low-fluence, high-density with high-fluence, low-density treatment with CO2 FS on acne scars and enlarged pores. Methods Ten patients with mild to severe atrophic acne scars and enlarged pores were enrolled. Half of each subject's face was treated with a single session of CO2 FS with a fluence of 70 mJ and a density of 150 spots/cm2; the other half was treated with a fluence of 30 mJ and a density of 250 spots/cm2. Results Follow-up results 3 months after a single low-fluence, high-density treatment with CO2 FS showed that four of 10 participants had clinical improvement of 51{\%} to 75{\%} from baseline. After the high-fluence, low-density CO2 FS treatment, five of 10 patients demonstrated marked clinical improvements of more than 76{\%}. Conclusion Higher-energy, lower-density laser settings seem to be more effective than lower-energy, higher-density settings for acne scars and enlarged pores, although our results do not constitute a conclusive comparison of the two different modes of CO2 FS.",
author = "Jung, {Jin Young} and Lee, {Ju Hee} and Ryu, {Dong Jin} and Lee, {Sang Ju} and Dongsik Bang and Cho, {Sung Bin}",
year = "2010",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/j.1524-4725.2010.01803.x",
language = "English",
volume = "36",
pages = "2022--2029",
journal = "Dermatologic Surgery",
issn = "1076-0512",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "12",

}

Lower-fluence, higher-density versus higher-fluence, lower-density treatment with a 10,600-nm carbon dioxide fractional laser system : A split-face, evaluator-blinded study. / Jung, Jin Young; Lee, Ju Hee; Ryu, Dong Jin; Lee, Sang Ju; Bang, Dongsik; Cho, Sung Bin.

In: Dermatologic Surgery, Vol. 36, No. 12, 01.12.2010, p. 2022-2029.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Lower-fluence, higher-density versus higher-fluence, lower-density treatment with a 10,600-nm carbon dioxide fractional laser system

T2 - A split-face, evaluator-blinded study

AU - Jung, Jin Young

AU - Lee, Ju Hee

AU - Ryu, Dong Jin

AU - Lee, Sang Ju

AU - Bang, Dongsik

AU - Cho, Sung Bin

PY - 2010/12/1

Y1 - 2010/12/1

N2 - Background Adequate laser settings in the treatment of scars using a carbon dioxide fractional laser system (CO2 FS) have not been established. Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of low-fluence, high-density with high-fluence, low-density treatment with CO2 FS on acne scars and enlarged pores. Methods Ten patients with mild to severe atrophic acne scars and enlarged pores were enrolled. Half of each subject's face was treated with a single session of CO2 FS with a fluence of 70 mJ and a density of 150 spots/cm2; the other half was treated with a fluence of 30 mJ and a density of 250 spots/cm2. Results Follow-up results 3 months after a single low-fluence, high-density treatment with CO2 FS showed that four of 10 participants had clinical improvement of 51% to 75% from baseline. After the high-fluence, low-density CO2 FS treatment, five of 10 patients demonstrated marked clinical improvements of more than 76%. Conclusion Higher-energy, lower-density laser settings seem to be more effective than lower-energy, higher-density settings for acne scars and enlarged pores, although our results do not constitute a conclusive comparison of the two different modes of CO2 FS.

AB - Background Adequate laser settings in the treatment of scars using a carbon dioxide fractional laser system (CO2 FS) have not been established. Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of low-fluence, high-density with high-fluence, low-density treatment with CO2 FS on acne scars and enlarged pores. Methods Ten patients with mild to severe atrophic acne scars and enlarged pores were enrolled. Half of each subject's face was treated with a single session of CO2 FS with a fluence of 70 mJ and a density of 150 spots/cm2; the other half was treated with a fluence of 30 mJ and a density of 250 spots/cm2. Results Follow-up results 3 months after a single low-fluence, high-density treatment with CO2 FS showed that four of 10 participants had clinical improvement of 51% to 75% from baseline. After the high-fluence, low-density CO2 FS treatment, five of 10 patients demonstrated marked clinical improvements of more than 76%. Conclusion Higher-energy, lower-density laser settings seem to be more effective than lower-energy, higher-density settings for acne scars and enlarged pores, although our results do not constitute a conclusive comparison of the two different modes of CO2 FS.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78650031427&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78650031427&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2010.01803.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2010.01803.x

M3 - Article

C2 - 21070459

AN - SCOPUS:78650031427

VL - 36

SP - 2022

EP - 2029

JO - Dermatologic Surgery

JF - Dermatologic Surgery

SN - 1076-0512

IS - 12

ER -