Masked-target recovery requires focused attention on the target object

Geoffrey Woodman, Do Joon Yi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Flashing a homogeneous light mask after the presentation of a masked target reduces the deleterious effects of the mask, a phenomenon often called target recovery. Target recovery has been studied using masking paradigms in which a target object is presented in isolation prior to the presentation of a mask, thus capturing attention. In the present study, we examined whether target recovery is possible when a target does not benefit from attentional capture. We hypothesized that target recovery would be eliminated when a target must compete with distractors for perceptual attention. Replicating classic studies, we observed target recovery when pattern and light masks followed an isolated target. However, target recovery was not observed when a light mask followed a masked visual search target. Furthermore, using an attentional-capture paradigm we found that sudden onset search targets were recoverable whereas nononset targets were not. The present findings indicate that attentional capture by a target prior to masking plays a critical role in the subsequent recovery of the target.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)385-401
Number of pages17
JournalVisual Cognition
Volume15
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007 May 1

Fingerprint

Masks
Light
Recovery

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Cognitive Neuroscience

Cite this

@article{48bcd1d0d99046868edd721f6bcaf207,
title = "Masked-target recovery requires focused attention on the target object",
abstract = "Flashing a homogeneous light mask after the presentation of a masked target reduces the deleterious effects of the mask, a phenomenon often called target recovery. Target recovery has been studied using masking paradigms in which a target object is presented in isolation prior to the presentation of a mask, thus capturing attention. In the present study, we examined whether target recovery is possible when a target does not benefit from attentional capture. We hypothesized that target recovery would be eliminated when a target must compete with distractors for perceptual attention. Replicating classic studies, we observed target recovery when pattern and light masks followed an isolated target. However, target recovery was not observed when a light mask followed a masked visual search target. Furthermore, using an attentional-capture paradigm we found that sudden onset search targets were recoverable whereas nononset targets were not. The present findings indicate that attentional capture by a target prior to masking plays a critical role in the subsequent recovery of the target.",
author = "Geoffrey Woodman and Yi, {Do Joon}",
year = "2007",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/13506280600859748",
language = "English",
volume = "15",
pages = "385--401",
journal = "Visual Cognition",
issn = "1350-6285",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "4",

}

Masked-target recovery requires focused attention on the target object. / Woodman, Geoffrey; Yi, Do Joon.

In: Visual Cognition, Vol. 15, No. 4, 01.05.2007, p. 385-401.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Masked-target recovery requires focused attention on the target object

AU - Woodman, Geoffrey

AU - Yi, Do Joon

PY - 2007/5/1

Y1 - 2007/5/1

N2 - Flashing a homogeneous light mask after the presentation of a masked target reduces the deleterious effects of the mask, a phenomenon often called target recovery. Target recovery has been studied using masking paradigms in which a target object is presented in isolation prior to the presentation of a mask, thus capturing attention. In the present study, we examined whether target recovery is possible when a target does not benefit from attentional capture. We hypothesized that target recovery would be eliminated when a target must compete with distractors for perceptual attention. Replicating classic studies, we observed target recovery when pattern and light masks followed an isolated target. However, target recovery was not observed when a light mask followed a masked visual search target. Furthermore, using an attentional-capture paradigm we found that sudden onset search targets were recoverable whereas nononset targets were not. The present findings indicate that attentional capture by a target prior to masking plays a critical role in the subsequent recovery of the target.

AB - Flashing a homogeneous light mask after the presentation of a masked target reduces the deleterious effects of the mask, a phenomenon often called target recovery. Target recovery has been studied using masking paradigms in which a target object is presented in isolation prior to the presentation of a mask, thus capturing attention. In the present study, we examined whether target recovery is possible when a target does not benefit from attentional capture. We hypothesized that target recovery would be eliminated when a target must compete with distractors for perceptual attention. Replicating classic studies, we observed target recovery when pattern and light masks followed an isolated target. However, target recovery was not observed when a light mask followed a masked visual search target. Furthermore, using an attentional-capture paradigm we found that sudden onset search targets were recoverable whereas nononset targets were not. The present findings indicate that attentional capture by a target prior to masking plays a critical role in the subsequent recovery of the target.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33947188605&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33947188605&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/13506280600859748

DO - 10.1080/13506280600859748

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:33947188605

VL - 15

SP - 385

EP - 401

JO - Visual Cognition

JF - Visual Cognition

SN - 1350-6285

IS - 4

ER -