Minimally Invasive Approach for Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy: a Comparative Analysis of Postoperative Complication Between Splenic Vessel Conserving and Warshaw’s Technique

Lip Seng Lee, Ho Kyoung Hwang, ChangMoo Kang, Woo Jung Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with Warshaw’s technique (WT) was reported to have higher spleen-related complication. The aim of this study was to evaluate the postoperative complication between the splenic vessel-conserving technique (SVC) and the WT when they were performed by the minimally invasive approach. Methods: From January 2006 to June 2015, data of the patients who had laparoscopic or robotic-assisted spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy for benign or borderline malignant tumors were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into SVC and the WT group for comparison. Results: Of the 89 patients who had the spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy, 63 were SVC, whereas 26 were WT. The CT scans showed that patients who had WT were found to have higher rate of splenic infarction (P < 0.001) and had significantly higher rate of collateral vessel formation at 1 year (P < 0.001). All the splenic infarctions were low grade and asymptomatic which resolved spontaneously. None of the patients with collateral formation experienced gastrointestinal bleeding. The postoperative complication of SVC and WT did not differ significantly. Conclusion: SVC and WT were found to have comparable outcome. Both techniques can be used to achieve higher spleen-preserving rate.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1464-1470
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
Volume20
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Aug 1

Fingerprint

Pancreatectomy
Spleen
Splenic Infarction
Robotics
Hemorrhage
Neoplasms

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Gastroenterology

Cite this

@article{efbbe4b10ffb4a35b61ff80fdfb31124,
title = "Minimally Invasive Approach for Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy: a Comparative Analysis of Postoperative Complication Between Splenic Vessel Conserving and Warshaw’s Technique",
abstract = "Background: Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with Warshaw’s technique (WT) was reported to have higher spleen-related complication. The aim of this study was to evaluate the postoperative complication between the splenic vessel-conserving technique (SVC) and the WT when they were performed by the minimally invasive approach. Methods: From January 2006 to June 2015, data of the patients who had laparoscopic or robotic-assisted spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy for benign or borderline malignant tumors were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into SVC and the WT group for comparison. Results: Of the 89 patients who had the spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy, 63 were SVC, whereas 26 were WT. The CT scans showed that patients who had WT were found to have higher rate of splenic infarction (P < 0.001) and had significantly higher rate of collateral vessel formation at 1 year (P < 0.001). All the splenic infarctions were low grade and asymptomatic which resolved spontaneously. None of the patients with collateral formation experienced gastrointestinal bleeding. The postoperative complication of SVC and WT did not differ significantly. Conclusion: SVC and WT were found to have comparable outcome. Both techniques can be used to achieve higher spleen-preserving rate.",
author = "Lee, {Lip Seng} and Hwang, {Ho Kyoung} and ChangMoo Kang and Lee, {Woo Jung}",
year = "2016",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11605-016-3141-z",
language = "English",
volume = "20",
pages = "1464--1470",
journal = "Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery",
issn = "1091-255X",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Minimally Invasive Approach for Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomy

T2 - a Comparative Analysis of Postoperative Complication Between Splenic Vessel Conserving and Warshaw’s Technique

AU - Lee, Lip Seng

AU - Hwang, Ho Kyoung

AU - Kang, ChangMoo

AU - Lee, Woo Jung

PY - 2016/8/1

Y1 - 2016/8/1

N2 - Background: Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with Warshaw’s technique (WT) was reported to have higher spleen-related complication. The aim of this study was to evaluate the postoperative complication between the splenic vessel-conserving technique (SVC) and the WT when they were performed by the minimally invasive approach. Methods: From January 2006 to June 2015, data of the patients who had laparoscopic or robotic-assisted spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy for benign or borderline malignant tumors were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into SVC and the WT group for comparison. Results: Of the 89 patients who had the spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy, 63 were SVC, whereas 26 were WT. The CT scans showed that patients who had WT were found to have higher rate of splenic infarction (P < 0.001) and had significantly higher rate of collateral vessel formation at 1 year (P < 0.001). All the splenic infarctions were low grade and asymptomatic which resolved spontaneously. None of the patients with collateral formation experienced gastrointestinal bleeding. The postoperative complication of SVC and WT did not differ significantly. Conclusion: SVC and WT were found to have comparable outcome. Both techniques can be used to achieve higher spleen-preserving rate.

AB - Background: Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with Warshaw’s technique (WT) was reported to have higher spleen-related complication. The aim of this study was to evaluate the postoperative complication between the splenic vessel-conserving technique (SVC) and the WT when they were performed by the minimally invasive approach. Methods: From January 2006 to June 2015, data of the patients who had laparoscopic or robotic-assisted spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy for benign or borderline malignant tumors were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into SVC and the WT group for comparison. Results: Of the 89 patients who had the spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy, 63 were SVC, whereas 26 were WT. The CT scans showed that patients who had WT were found to have higher rate of splenic infarction (P < 0.001) and had significantly higher rate of collateral vessel formation at 1 year (P < 0.001). All the splenic infarctions were low grade and asymptomatic which resolved spontaneously. None of the patients with collateral formation experienced gastrointestinal bleeding. The postoperative complication of SVC and WT did not differ significantly. Conclusion: SVC and WT were found to have comparable outcome. Both techniques can be used to achieve higher spleen-preserving rate.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84963677233&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84963677233&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11605-016-3141-z

DO - 10.1007/s11605-016-3141-z

M3 - Article

C2 - 27073079

AN - SCOPUS:84963677233

VL - 20

SP - 1464

EP - 1470

JO - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

JF - Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

SN - 1091-255X

IS - 8

ER -