Minimally invasive open thyroidectomy

Cheong Soo Park, Woung Youn Chung, Hang-Seok Chang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

47 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We recently developed a new surgical technique for carrying out thyroidectomy, to minimize tissue trauma by obviating unnecessary neck exploration. This report describes our technique of performing minimally invasive open thyroidectomy and compares the results with those of conventional thyroidectomy. Minimally invasive open thyroidectomy was performed by making a small skin incision, 3.0-4.5 cm long, and approaching the thyroid directly via a transverse division of the strap muscles without raising skin flaps. The outcomes of 466 patients who underwent a minimally invasive open thyroidectomy were retrospectively compared with those of 437 patients who underwent conventional thyroidectomy for various types of thyroid nodules. There was no significant difference in the extent of surgery between the group of patients who underwent minimally invasive thyroidectomy and the group of patients who underwent conventional thyroidectomy. However, the length of the skin incision, at 3.7 ± 0.7 vs 9.6 ± 3.3 cm, respectively, operative time, at 57.6 ± 11.7 vs 85.2 ± 32.3 min, respectively, blood loss, at 18.4 ± 15.3 vs 43.1 ± 21.8 ml, respectively, and hospital stay, at 1.6 ± 0.5 vs 4.3 ± 1.6 days, respectively, were significantly reduced in the minimally invasive open thyroidectomy group (P < 0.05). Moreover, the number of patients who required postoperative analgesia was significantly less in the minimally invasive open thyroidectomy group. These results show that minimally invasive open thyroidectomy provides surgeons with a clear operative field, and that it has proven to be simple, safe, and practical for selected patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)665-669
Number of pages5
JournalSurgery Today
Volume31
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2001 Aug 29

Fingerprint

Thyroidectomy
Skin
Thyroid Nodule
Operative Time
Analgesia
Length of Stay
Thyroid Gland
Neck
Muscles

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery

Cite this

Park, Cheong Soo ; Chung, Woung Youn ; Chang, Hang-Seok. / Minimally invasive open thyroidectomy. In: Surgery Today. 2001 ; Vol. 31, No. 8. pp. 665-669.
@article{6f7700add86840848d8bf8579e68fab5,
title = "Minimally invasive open thyroidectomy",
abstract = "We recently developed a new surgical technique for carrying out thyroidectomy, to minimize tissue trauma by obviating unnecessary neck exploration. This report describes our technique of performing minimally invasive open thyroidectomy and compares the results with those of conventional thyroidectomy. Minimally invasive open thyroidectomy was performed by making a small skin incision, 3.0-4.5 cm long, and approaching the thyroid directly via a transverse division of the strap muscles without raising skin flaps. The outcomes of 466 patients who underwent a minimally invasive open thyroidectomy were retrospectively compared with those of 437 patients who underwent conventional thyroidectomy for various types of thyroid nodules. There was no significant difference in the extent of surgery between the group of patients who underwent minimally invasive thyroidectomy and the group of patients who underwent conventional thyroidectomy. However, the length of the skin incision, at 3.7 ± 0.7 vs 9.6 ± 3.3 cm, respectively, operative time, at 57.6 ± 11.7 vs 85.2 ± 32.3 min, respectively, blood loss, at 18.4 ± 15.3 vs 43.1 ± 21.8 ml, respectively, and hospital stay, at 1.6 ± 0.5 vs 4.3 ± 1.6 days, respectively, were significantly reduced in the minimally invasive open thyroidectomy group (P < 0.05). Moreover, the number of patients who required postoperative analgesia was significantly less in the minimally invasive open thyroidectomy group. These results show that minimally invasive open thyroidectomy provides surgeons with a clear operative field, and that it has proven to be simple, safe, and practical for selected patients.",
author = "Park, {Cheong Soo} and Chung, {Woung Youn} and Hang-Seok Chang",
year = "2001",
month = "8",
day = "29",
doi = "10.1007/s005950170066",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "665--669",
journal = "Surgery Today",
issn = "0941-1291",
publisher = "Springer Japan",
number = "8",

}

Minimally invasive open thyroidectomy. / Park, Cheong Soo; Chung, Woung Youn; Chang, Hang-Seok.

In: Surgery Today, Vol. 31, No. 8, 29.08.2001, p. 665-669.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Minimally invasive open thyroidectomy

AU - Park, Cheong Soo

AU - Chung, Woung Youn

AU - Chang, Hang-Seok

PY - 2001/8/29

Y1 - 2001/8/29

N2 - We recently developed a new surgical technique for carrying out thyroidectomy, to minimize tissue trauma by obviating unnecessary neck exploration. This report describes our technique of performing minimally invasive open thyroidectomy and compares the results with those of conventional thyroidectomy. Minimally invasive open thyroidectomy was performed by making a small skin incision, 3.0-4.5 cm long, and approaching the thyroid directly via a transverse division of the strap muscles without raising skin flaps. The outcomes of 466 patients who underwent a minimally invasive open thyroidectomy were retrospectively compared with those of 437 patients who underwent conventional thyroidectomy for various types of thyroid nodules. There was no significant difference in the extent of surgery between the group of patients who underwent minimally invasive thyroidectomy and the group of patients who underwent conventional thyroidectomy. However, the length of the skin incision, at 3.7 ± 0.7 vs 9.6 ± 3.3 cm, respectively, operative time, at 57.6 ± 11.7 vs 85.2 ± 32.3 min, respectively, blood loss, at 18.4 ± 15.3 vs 43.1 ± 21.8 ml, respectively, and hospital stay, at 1.6 ± 0.5 vs 4.3 ± 1.6 days, respectively, were significantly reduced in the minimally invasive open thyroidectomy group (P < 0.05). Moreover, the number of patients who required postoperative analgesia was significantly less in the minimally invasive open thyroidectomy group. These results show that minimally invasive open thyroidectomy provides surgeons with a clear operative field, and that it has proven to be simple, safe, and practical for selected patients.

AB - We recently developed a new surgical technique for carrying out thyroidectomy, to minimize tissue trauma by obviating unnecessary neck exploration. This report describes our technique of performing minimally invasive open thyroidectomy and compares the results with those of conventional thyroidectomy. Minimally invasive open thyroidectomy was performed by making a small skin incision, 3.0-4.5 cm long, and approaching the thyroid directly via a transverse division of the strap muscles without raising skin flaps. The outcomes of 466 patients who underwent a minimally invasive open thyroidectomy were retrospectively compared with those of 437 patients who underwent conventional thyroidectomy for various types of thyroid nodules. There was no significant difference in the extent of surgery between the group of patients who underwent minimally invasive thyroidectomy and the group of patients who underwent conventional thyroidectomy. However, the length of the skin incision, at 3.7 ± 0.7 vs 9.6 ± 3.3 cm, respectively, operative time, at 57.6 ± 11.7 vs 85.2 ± 32.3 min, respectively, blood loss, at 18.4 ± 15.3 vs 43.1 ± 21.8 ml, respectively, and hospital stay, at 1.6 ± 0.5 vs 4.3 ± 1.6 days, respectively, were significantly reduced in the minimally invasive open thyroidectomy group (P < 0.05). Moreover, the number of patients who required postoperative analgesia was significantly less in the minimally invasive open thyroidectomy group. These results show that minimally invasive open thyroidectomy provides surgeons with a clear operative field, and that it has proven to be simple, safe, and practical for selected patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034880390&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034880390&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s005950170066

DO - 10.1007/s005950170066

M3 - Article

C2 - 11510599

AN - SCOPUS:0034880390

VL - 31

SP - 665

EP - 669

JO - Surgery Today

JF - Surgery Today

SN - 0941-1291

IS - 8

ER -