Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Current Status and Future Perspectives

Chinock Cheong, Nam Kyu Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Although laparoscopic resection for colon cancer has been proven safe and feasible when compared with open resection, currently no clear evidence is available regarding minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer. This type of surgery may benefit patients by allowing fast recovery of normal dietary intake and bowel function, reduced postoperative pain, and shorter hospitalization. Therefore, minimally invasive surgeries such as laparoscopic or robot surgery have become the predominant treatment option for colon cancer. Specifically, the proportion of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in Korea increased from 42.6 to 64.7% until 2013. However, laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer is more difficult and technically demanding. In addition, the procedure requires a prolonged learning curve to achieve equivalent outcomes relative to open surgery. It is very challenging to approach the deep and narrow pelvis using laparoscopic instruments. However, robotic surgery provides better vision with a high definition three-dimensional view, exceptional ergonomics, Endowrist technology, enhanced dexterity of movement, and a lack of physiologic tremor, facilitated by the use of an assistant in the narrow and deep pelvis. Recently, an increasing number of reports have compared the outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgery for colon cancer. Such reports have prompted a discussion of the outcomes of minimally invasive surgery, including robotic surgery, for rectal cancer. The aim of this review is to summarize current data regarding the clinical outcomes, including oncologic outcomes, of minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)591-599
Number of pages9
JournalIndian Journal of Surgical Oncology
Volume8
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Dec 1

Fingerprint

Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Rectal Neoplasms
Colonic Neoplasms
Robotics
Pelvis
Laparoscopy
Colorectal Surgery
Learning Curve
Human Engineering
Tremor
Korea
Postoperative Pain
Colorectal Neoplasms
Hospitalization
Technology

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Oncology

Cite this

@article{a1fd6e0b11c04780b390792390a679b4,
title = "Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Current Status and Future Perspectives",
abstract = "Although laparoscopic resection for colon cancer has been proven safe and feasible when compared with open resection, currently no clear evidence is available regarding minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer. This type of surgery may benefit patients by allowing fast recovery of normal dietary intake and bowel function, reduced postoperative pain, and shorter hospitalization. Therefore, minimally invasive surgeries such as laparoscopic or robot surgery have become the predominant treatment option for colon cancer. Specifically, the proportion of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in Korea increased from 42.6 to 64.7{\%} until 2013. However, laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer is more difficult and technically demanding. In addition, the procedure requires a prolonged learning curve to achieve equivalent outcomes relative to open surgery. It is very challenging to approach the deep and narrow pelvis using laparoscopic instruments. However, robotic surgery provides better vision with a high definition three-dimensional view, exceptional ergonomics, Endowrist technology, enhanced dexterity of movement, and a lack of physiologic tremor, facilitated by the use of an assistant in the narrow and deep pelvis. Recently, an increasing number of reports have compared the outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgery for colon cancer. Such reports have prompted a discussion of the outcomes of minimally invasive surgery, including robotic surgery, for rectal cancer. The aim of this review is to summarize current data regarding the clinical outcomes, including oncologic outcomes, of minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer.",
author = "Chinock Cheong and Kim, {Nam Kyu}",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s13193-017-0624-7",
language = "English",
volume = "8",
pages = "591--599",
journal = "Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology",
issn = "0975-7651",
publisher = "Springer India",
number = "4",

}

Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer : Current Status and Future Perspectives. / Cheong, Chinock; Kim, Nam Kyu.

In: Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology, Vol. 8, No. 4, 01.12.2017, p. 591-599.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer

T2 - Current Status and Future Perspectives

AU - Cheong, Chinock

AU - Kim, Nam Kyu

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Although laparoscopic resection for colon cancer has been proven safe and feasible when compared with open resection, currently no clear evidence is available regarding minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer. This type of surgery may benefit patients by allowing fast recovery of normal dietary intake and bowel function, reduced postoperative pain, and shorter hospitalization. Therefore, minimally invasive surgeries such as laparoscopic or robot surgery have become the predominant treatment option for colon cancer. Specifically, the proportion of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in Korea increased from 42.6 to 64.7% until 2013. However, laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer is more difficult and technically demanding. In addition, the procedure requires a prolonged learning curve to achieve equivalent outcomes relative to open surgery. It is very challenging to approach the deep and narrow pelvis using laparoscopic instruments. However, robotic surgery provides better vision with a high definition three-dimensional view, exceptional ergonomics, Endowrist technology, enhanced dexterity of movement, and a lack of physiologic tremor, facilitated by the use of an assistant in the narrow and deep pelvis. Recently, an increasing number of reports have compared the outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgery for colon cancer. Such reports have prompted a discussion of the outcomes of minimally invasive surgery, including robotic surgery, for rectal cancer. The aim of this review is to summarize current data regarding the clinical outcomes, including oncologic outcomes, of minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer.

AB - Although laparoscopic resection for colon cancer has been proven safe and feasible when compared with open resection, currently no clear evidence is available regarding minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer. This type of surgery may benefit patients by allowing fast recovery of normal dietary intake and bowel function, reduced postoperative pain, and shorter hospitalization. Therefore, minimally invasive surgeries such as laparoscopic or robot surgery have become the predominant treatment option for colon cancer. Specifically, the proportion of laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in Korea increased from 42.6 to 64.7% until 2013. However, laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer is more difficult and technically demanding. In addition, the procedure requires a prolonged learning curve to achieve equivalent outcomes relative to open surgery. It is very challenging to approach the deep and narrow pelvis using laparoscopic instruments. However, robotic surgery provides better vision with a high definition three-dimensional view, exceptional ergonomics, Endowrist technology, enhanced dexterity of movement, and a lack of physiologic tremor, facilitated by the use of an assistant in the narrow and deep pelvis. Recently, an increasing number of reports have compared the outcomes of laparoscopic and open surgery for colon cancer. Such reports have prompted a discussion of the outcomes of minimally invasive surgery, including robotic surgery, for rectal cancer. The aim of this review is to summarize current data regarding the clinical outcomes, including oncologic outcomes, of minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85036665403&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85036665403&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s13193-017-0624-7

DO - 10.1007/s13193-017-0624-7

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:85036665403

VL - 8

SP - 591

EP - 599

JO - Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology

JF - Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology

SN - 0975-7651

IS - 4

ER -