Minority comparison model: Effects of Whites' multiracial evaluation on symbolic racism and racialized policy preferences

Young Min Baek, Angela M. Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Most Racial Studies primarily focus on African Americans without paying attention to nonblack minorities, and it fails to capture recent increase in racial diversity. Based on previous theories and empirical findings, we propose a new model, minority comparison model, which accounts for theoretical shortcomings in Racial Studies. This model (1) captures psychological processes that compare blacks and nonblacks, and (2) explores the effects of whites' multiracial evaluation on racialized policy preferences. Drawing on a 2008 national representative sample, this study finds that whites who have positive stereotype of nonblacks (e.g., Hispanics and/or Asians) but negative stereotype of blacks show substantially higher symbolic racism and stronger opposition to Affirmative Action, whereas whites who have positive stereotype of blacks but negative stereotypes of nonblacks have stronger opposition to expansive immigration policy. Our study offers new ways of understanding and accounting for symbolic racism in modern context, and shows how whites' preferences in racialized policies are influenced by multiracial evaluation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)127-138
Number of pages12
JournalSocial Science Journal
Volume49
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Jun 1

Fingerprint

model comparison
Racism
racism
stereotype
minority
evaluation
opposition
Emigration and Immigration
immigration policy
affirmative action
Hispanic Americans
African Americans
Psychology

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{a4bf043fa6ea433baf98fc5cc3a6115e,
title = "Minority comparison model: Effects of Whites' multiracial evaluation on symbolic racism and racialized policy preferences",
abstract = "Most Racial Studies primarily focus on African Americans without paying attention to nonblack minorities, and it fails to capture recent increase in racial diversity. Based on previous theories and empirical findings, we propose a new model, minority comparison model, which accounts for theoretical shortcomings in Racial Studies. This model (1) captures psychological processes that compare blacks and nonblacks, and (2) explores the effects of whites' multiracial evaluation on racialized policy preferences. Drawing on a 2008 national representative sample, this study finds that whites who have positive stereotype of nonblacks (e.g., Hispanics and/or Asians) but negative stereotype of blacks show substantially higher symbolic racism and stronger opposition to Affirmative Action, whereas whites who have positive stereotype of blacks but negative stereotypes of nonblacks have stronger opposition to expansive immigration policy. Our study offers new ways of understanding and accounting for symbolic racism in modern context, and shows how whites' preferences in racialized policies are influenced by multiracial evaluation.",
author = "Baek, {Young Min} and Lee, {Angela M.}",
year = "2012",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.soscij.2011.09.006",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "127--138",
journal = "Social Science Journal",
issn = "0362-3319",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Minority comparison model : Effects of Whites' multiracial evaluation on symbolic racism and racialized policy preferences. / Baek, Young Min; Lee, Angela M.

In: Social Science Journal, Vol. 49, No. 2, 01.06.2012, p. 127-138.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Minority comparison model

T2 - Effects of Whites' multiracial evaluation on symbolic racism and racialized policy preferences

AU - Baek, Young Min

AU - Lee, Angela M.

PY - 2012/6/1

Y1 - 2012/6/1

N2 - Most Racial Studies primarily focus on African Americans without paying attention to nonblack minorities, and it fails to capture recent increase in racial diversity. Based on previous theories and empirical findings, we propose a new model, minority comparison model, which accounts for theoretical shortcomings in Racial Studies. This model (1) captures psychological processes that compare blacks and nonblacks, and (2) explores the effects of whites' multiracial evaluation on racialized policy preferences. Drawing on a 2008 national representative sample, this study finds that whites who have positive stereotype of nonblacks (e.g., Hispanics and/or Asians) but negative stereotype of blacks show substantially higher symbolic racism and stronger opposition to Affirmative Action, whereas whites who have positive stereotype of blacks but negative stereotypes of nonblacks have stronger opposition to expansive immigration policy. Our study offers new ways of understanding and accounting for symbolic racism in modern context, and shows how whites' preferences in racialized policies are influenced by multiracial evaluation.

AB - Most Racial Studies primarily focus on African Americans without paying attention to nonblack minorities, and it fails to capture recent increase in racial diversity. Based on previous theories and empirical findings, we propose a new model, minority comparison model, which accounts for theoretical shortcomings in Racial Studies. This model (1) captures psychological processes that compare blacks and nonblacks, and (2) explores the effects of whites' multiracial evaluation on racialized policy preferences. Drawing on a 2008 national representative sample, this study finds that whites who have positive stereotype of nonblacks (e.g., Hispanics and/or Asians) but negative stereotype of blacks show substantially higher symbolic racism and stronger opposition to Affirmative Action, whereas whites who have positive stereotype of blacks but negative stereotypes of nonblacks have stronger opposition to expansive immigration policy. Our study offers new ways of understanding and accounting for symbolic racism in modern context, and shows how whites' preferences in racialized policies are influenced by multiracial evaluation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862756347&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862756347&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.soscij.2011.09.006

DO - 10.1016/j.soscij.2011.09.006

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84862756347

VL - 49

SP - 127

EP - 138

JO - Social Science Journal

JF - Social Science Journal

SN - 0362-3319

IS - 2

ER -