Abstract
Background: People with dementia die prematurely. Identifying differences in mortality rates between different types of dementia might aid in the development of preventive interventions for the most vulnerable populations. The aim of this study was to compare the difference in mortality rates between individuals without dementia and individuals with various types of dementia. Methods: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we did a systematic search of MEDLINE, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to July 11, 2020, for cross-sectional or cohort studies that assessed mortality and survival-related outcomes among people with different types of dementia compared with people without dementia. Single-arm studies without comparison groups and autopsy studies or family studies that used a selected sample were excluded. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used by two authors (D-JL and C-SC) independently to measure the methodological quality of included studies, and two authors (F-CY and P-TT) independently extracted data. We assessed differences in all-cause mortality rate and survival time from dementia diagnosis between individuals without dementia, individuals with Alzheimer's disease, and individuals with non-Alzheimer's disease dementias. The secondary outcomes were age at death and survival time from disease onset. Random-effects meta-analyses were done. Effect sizes included hazard ratios (HRs) and mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs. Potential moderators, including age-associated moderators, were identified through meta-regression and subgroup analyses. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42020198786. Findings: Our database search identified 11 973 records, and we included 78 eligible studies in our analyses, encompassing 63 125 individuals with dementia and 152 353 controls. Individuals with any type of dementia had a higher mortality rate than individuals without dementia (HR 5·90, 95% CI 3·53 to 9·86), and the HR for all-cause mortality was highest for Lewy body dementia (17·88, 5·87 to 54·46). After diagnosis, the mean survival time for people with Alzheimer's disease was 5·8 years (SD 2·0). Compared with people with Alzheimer's disease, a diagnosis of any non-Alzheimer's disease dementia was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality (HR 1·33, 1·21 to 1·46), a shorter survival time from diagnosis (MD −1·12 years, 95% CI −1·52 to −0·72), and a younger age at death (−1·76 years, −2·66 to −0·85). Survival time from disease onset was also shorter in people with non-Alzheimer's dementia, across types, compared with people with Alzheimer's disease, but the subgroup analysis revealed that this difference was only significant for vascular dementia (MD −1·27 years, −1·90 to −0·65) and dementia with Lewy bodies (MD −1·06 years, −1·68 to −0·44). The interactions between age and several survival-related outcomes were significant. 39 (50%) of the 78 included studies were rated as good quality, and large heterogeneity (I2>75%) was observed for most of the study outcomes. Interpretation: Alzheimer's disease is the most common type of dementia and one of the major causes of mortality worldwide. However, the findings from the current study suggest that non-Alzheimer's disease dementias were associated with higher morality rates and shorter life expectancy than Alzheimer's disease. Developing tailored treatment and rehabilitation programmes for different types of dementia is important for mental health providers, patients, and their families. Funding: None.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | e479-e488 |
Journal | The Lancet Healthy Longevity |
Volume | 2 |
Issue number | 8 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2021 Aug |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This work was not funded. BS is supported by a Clinical Lectureship ( ICA-CL-2017–03–001 ) jointly funded by Health Education England and the UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). BS is part-funded by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust. BS also holds active grants with the Medical Research Council (and the GCRF global multimorbidity seed-funding call) and Guy's & St Thomas' Charity (GSTT). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the (partner organisation), the NHS, NIHR, Department of Health and Social Care, MRC, or GSTT. RS is part-funded by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London; and the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration South London (NIHR South London) at King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. TKR has received research support from Brain Canada, Brain and Behavior Research Foundation, BrightFocus Foundation, Canada Foundation for Innovation, Canada Research Chair, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Centre for Aging and Brain Health Innovation, National Institutes of Health, Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation, and the Weston Brain Institute. TKR also received in-kind equipment support for an investigator-initiated study from Magstim, and in-kind research accounts from Scientific Brain Training Pro.
Funding Information:
This work was not funded. BS is supported by a Clinical Lectureship (ICA-CL-2017–03–001) jointly funded by Health Education England and the UK National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). BS is part-funded by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust. BS also holds active grants with the Medical Research Council (and the GCRF global multimorbidity seed-funding call) and Guy's & St Thomas' Charity (GSTT). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the (partner organisation), the NHS, NIHR, Department of Health and Social Care, MRC, or GSTT. RS is part-funded by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London; and the NIHR Applied Research Collaboration South London (NIHR South London) at King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. TKR has received research support from Brain Canada, Brain and Behavior Research Foundation, BrightFocus Foundation, Canada Foundation for Innovation, Canada Research Chair, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Centre for Aging and Brain Health Innovation, National Institutes of Health, Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care, Ontario Ministry of Research and Innovation, and the Weston Brain Institute. TKR also received in-kind equipment support for an investigator-initiated study from Magstim, and in-kind research accounts from Scientific Brain Training Pro.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Health(social science)
- Geriatrics and Gerontology
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Family Practice