Nature and nurture by definition means both

A response to males

Matt DeLisi, John Paul Wright, Michael George Vaughn, Kevin M. Beaver

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Recognition of the interplay between nature and nurture is decades old in fields such as psychiatry, but other fields in the social sciences continue to be hampered by the idea that social and biological variables compete for explanatory relevance. In a recent study of the adolescent brain and risk taking, Males critiqued biologically oriented approaches as "biodeterminist" compared to environmentally friendly approaches. Here the authors suggest that the use of biological and social variables, or nature and nurture, is not only uncontroversial but also essential for understanding psychopathology, externalizing, and antisocial behaviors. Moreover, biosocial scientific inquiry has led to progressive state policy in the case of Roper v. Simmons, precisely the opposite outcome that critics of biologically friendly research often claim.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)24-30
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Adolescent Research
Volume25
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Social Sciences
psychopathology
Risk-Taking
Psychopathology
psychiatry
Psychiatry
critic
brain
social science
adolescent
Brain
Research

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

DeLisi, Matt ; Wright, John Paul ; Vaughn, Michael George ; Beaver, Kevin M. / Nature and nurture by definition means both : A response to males. In: Journal of Adolescent Research. 2010 ; Vol. 25, No. 1. pp. 24-30.
@article{9a30496ba02e49bbbb1e0c5d70ceeaad,
title = "Nature and nurture by definition means both: A response to males",
abstract = "Recognition of the interplay between nature and nurture is decades old in fields such as psychiatry, but other fields in the social sciences continue to be hampered by the idea that social and biological variables compete for explanatory relevance. In a recent study of the adolescent brain and risk taking, Males critiqued biologically oriented approaches as {"}biodeterminist{"} compared to environmentally friendly approaches. Here the authors suggest that the use of biological and social variables, or nature and nurture, is not only uncontroversial but also essential for understanding psychopathology, externalizing, and antisocial behaviors. Moreover, biosocial scientific inquiry has led to progressive state policy in the case of Roper v. Simmons, precisely the opposite outcome that critics of biologically friendly research often claim.",
author = "Matt DeLisi and Wright, {John Paul} and Vaughn, {Michael George} and Beaver, {Kevin M.}",
year = "2010",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0743558409353063",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "24--30",
journal = "Journal of Adolescent Research",
issn = "0743-5584",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Nature and nurture by definition means both : A response to males. / DeLisi, Matt; Wright, John Paul; Vaughn, Michael George; Beaver, Kevin M.

In: Journal of Adolescent Research, Vol. 25, No. 1, 01.01.2010, p. 24-30.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nature and nurture by definition means both

T2 - A response to males

AU - DeLisi, Matt

AU - Wright, John Paul

AU - Vaughn, Michael George

AU - Beaver, Kevin M.

PY - 2010/1/1

Y1 - 2010/1/1

N2 - Recognition of the interplay between nature and nurture is decades old in fields such as psychiatry, but other fields in the social sciences continue to be hampered by the idea that social and biological variables compete for explanatory relevance. In a recent study of the adolescent brain and risk taking, Males critiqued biologically oriented approaches as "biodeterminist" compared to environmentally friendly approaches. Here the authors suggest that the use of biological and social variables, or nature and nurture, is not only uncontroversial but also essential for understanding psychopathology, externalizing, and antisocial behaviors. Moreover, biosocial scientific inquiry has led to progressive state policy in the case of Roper v. Simmons, precisely the opposite outcome that critics of biologically friendly research often claim.

AB - Recognition of the interplay between nature and nurture is decades old in fields such as psychiatry, but other fields in the social sciences continue to be hampered by the idea that social and biological variables compete for explanatory relevance. In a recent study of the adolescent brain and risk taking, Males critiqued biologically oriented approaches as "biodeterminist" compared to environmentally friendly approaches. Here the authors suggest that the use of biological and social variables, or nature and nurture, is not only uncontroversial but also essential for understanding psychopathology, externalizing, and antisocial behaviors. Moreover, biosocial scientific inquiry has led to progressive state policy in the case of Roper v. Simmons, precisely the opposite outcome that critics of biologically friendly research often claim.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=71649084983&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=71649084983&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0743558409353063

DO - 10.1177/0743558409353063

M3 - Article

VL - 25

SP - 24

EP - 30

JO - Journal of Adolescent Research

JF - Journal of Adolescent Research

SN - 0743-5584

IS - 1

ER -