Networking partner selection and its impact on the perceived success of collaboration

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Scholars emphasize networks as a new agenda or a necessary tool for solving public problems, but have given little attention to the critical question of how networking partners are selected and activated. This study proposes four possible scenarios for the selection of networking partners based on intention to network with a potential partner and activation of networking with that partner. The results show that activated networking initially intended by the partner brings the highest collaboration performance, while activated networking initially intended by the focal actor results in the second-highest outcome. In the real world, however, networking is less likely to be proposed and initiated by the partner; so, the expected outcome may be lower than in the other case. The study suggests that public managers need to strategically find beneficial partner candidates and actively network with them.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)632-637
Number of pages6
JournalPublic Performance and Management Review
Volume37
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Jun 1

Fingerprint

networking
activation
Networking
Partner selection
candidacy
manager
scenario
performance

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Public Administration
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

@article{ee67c689c68e40b6b33fa3cfce949d2d,
title = "Networking partner selection and its impact on the perceived success of collaboration",
abstract = "Scholars emphasize networks as a new agenda or a necessary tool for solving public problems, but have given little attention to the critical question of how networking partners are selected and activated. This study proposes four possible scenarios for the selection of networking partners based on intention to network with a potential partner and activation of networking with that partner. The results show that activated networking initially intended by the partner brings the highest collaboration performance, while activated networking initially intended by the focal actor results in the second-highest outcome. In the real world, however, networking is less likely to be proposed and initiated by the partner; so, the expected outcome may be lower than in the other case. The study suggests that public managers need to strategically find beneficial partner candidates and actively network with them.",
author = "Sangyub Ryu",
year = "2014",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2753/PMR1530-9576370405",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "632--637",
journal = "Public Performance & Management Review",
issn = "1530-9576",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "4",

}

Networking partner selection and its impact on the perceived success of collaboration. / Ryu, Sangyub.

In: Public Performance and Management Review, Vol. 37, No. 4, 01.06.2014, p. 632-637.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Networking partner selection and its impact on the perceived success of collaboration

AU - Ryu, Sangyub

PY - 2014/6/1

Y1 - 2014/6/1

N2 - Scholars emphasize networks as a new agenda or a necessary tool for solving public problems, but have given little attention to the critical question of how networking partners are selected and activated. This study proposes four possible scenarios for the selection of networking partners based on intention to network with a potential partner and activation of networking with that partner. The results show that activated networking initially intended by the partner brings the highest collaboration performance, while activated networking initially intended by the focal actor results in the second-highest outcome. In the real world, however, networking is less likely to be proposed and initiated by the partner; so, the expected outcome may be lower than in the other case. The study suggests that public managers need to strategically find beneficial partner candidates and actively network with them.

AB - Scholars emphasize networks as a new agenda or a necessary tool for solving public problems, but have given little attention to the critical question of how networking partners are selected and activated. This study proposes four possible scenarios for the selection of networking partners based on intention to network with a potential partner and activation of networking with that partner. The results show that activated networking initially intended by the partner brings the highest collaboration performance, while activated networking initially intended by the focal actor results in the second-highest outcome. In the real world, however, networking is less likely to be proposed and initiated by the partner; so, the expected outcome may be lower than in the other case. The study suggests that public managers need to strategically find beneficial partner candidates and actively network with them.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84904797695&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84904797695&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2753/PMR1530-9576370405

DO - 10.2753/PMR1530-9576370405

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 632

EP - 637

JO - Public Performance & Management Review

JF - Public Performance & Management Review

SN - 1530-9576

IS - 4

ER -