Neurophysiological evidence for the country-of-origin effect: An event-related potential study

Byoung Kyong Min, Kwangsu Cho, Jungyeon Sung, Erin Cho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Consumers often rely on observable cues that hint at the hidden quality of a product. The aim of this study was to investigate brain activities associated with the country-of-origin (COO) effect and consumer evaluation of a product design. Electroencephalogram recordings were used to observe event-related brain potentials associated with the COO effect and design evaluation. We found that the frontocentral N90 and parieto-occipital P220 amplitudes are involved in forming preference to design, whereas the COO effect is processed in the centroparietal P500 amplitude. We also found a significant interaction effect between COO and design preference with regard to reaction times. Specifically, participants tended to spend more time making a preference decision when they did not like the product design made in a country with a favorable COO. These results imply that the two cognitive processes, evaluation of COO and formation of design preference, are activated independently at an early stage. It also suggests that these two processes interact with each other toward the end of the decision phase. Together, the results of this study provide neuropsychological evidence supporting a significant role of COO in the formation of design preference. Future studies are required to further delve into other neurophysiological activities associated with the COO effect.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)274-278
Number of pages5
JournalNeuroReport
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Mar 5

Fingerprint

Evoked Potentials
Brain
Reaction Time
Cues
Electroencephalography

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Neuroscience(all)

Cite this

Min, Byoung Kyong ; Cho, Kwangsu ; Sung, Jungyeon ; Cho, Erin. / Neurophysiological evidence for the country-of-origin effect : An event-related potential study. In: NeuroReport. 2014 ; Vol. 25, No. 4. pp. 274-278.
@article{5e988429134440ebb3f43271b1d560e8,
title = "Neurophysiological evidence for the country-of-origin effect: An event-related potential study",
abstract = "Consumers often rely on observable cues that hint at the hidden quality of a product. The aim of this study was to investigate brain activities associated with the country-of-origin (COO) effect and consumer evaluation of a product design. Electroencephalogram recordings were used to observe event-related brain potentials associated with the COO effect and design evaluation. We found that the frontocentral N90 and parieto-occipital P220 amplitudes are involved in forming preference to design, whereas the COO effect is processed in the centroparietal P500 amplitude. We also found a significant interaction effect between COO and design preference with regard to reaction times. Specifically, participants tended to spend more time making a preference decision when they did not like the product design made in a country with a favorable COO. These results imply that the two cognitive processes, evaluation of COO and formation of design preference, are activated independently at an early stage. It also suggests that these two processes interact with each other toward the end of the decision phase. Together, the results of this study provide neuropsychological evidence supporting a significant role of COO in the formation of design preference. Future studies are required to further delve into other neurophysiological activities associated with the COO effect.",
author = "Min, {Byoung Kyong} and Kwangsu Cho and Jungyeon Sung and Erin Cho",
year = "2014",
month = "3",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1097/WNR.0000000000000102",
language = "English",
volume = "25",
pages = "274--278",
journal = "NeuroReport",
issn = "0959-4965",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "4",

}

Neurophysiological evidence for the country-of-origin effect : An event-related potential study. / Min, Byoung Kyong; Cho, Kwangsu; Sung, Jungyeon; Cho, Erin.

In: NeuroReport, Vol. 25, No. 4, 05.03.2014, p. 274-278.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Neurophysiological evidence for the country-of-origin effect

T2 - An event-related potential study

AU - Min, Byoung Kyong

AU - Cho, Kwangsu

AU - Sung, Jungyeon

AU - Cho, Erin

PY - 2014/3/5

Y1 - 2014/3/5

N2 - Consumers often rely on observable cues that hint at the hidden quality of a product. The aim of this study was to investigate brain activities associated with the country-of-origin (COO) effect and consumer evaluation of a product design. Electroencephalogram recordings were used to observe event-related brain potentials associated with the COO effect and design evaluation. We found that the frontocentral N90 and parieto-occipital P220 amplitudes are involved in forming preference to design, whereas the COO effect is processed in the centroparietal P500 amplitude. We also found a significant interaction effect between COO and design preference with regard to reaction times. Specifically, participants tended to spend more time making a preference decision when they did not like the product design made in a country with a favorable COO. These results imply that the two cognitive processes, evaluation of COO and formation of design preference, are activated independently at an early stage. It also suggests that these two processes interact with each other toward the end of the decision phase. Together, the results of this study provide neuropsychological evidence supporting a significant role of COO in the formation of design preference. Future studies are required to further delve into other neurophysiological activities associated with the COO effect.

AB - Consumers often rely on observable cues that hint at the hidden quality of a product. The aim of this study was to investigate brain activities associated with the country-of-origin (COO) effect and consumer evaluation of a product design. Electroencephalogram recordings were used to observe event-related brain potentials associated with the COO effect and design evaluation. We found that the frontocentral N90 and parieto-occipital P220 amplitudes are involved in forming preference to design, whereas the COO effect is processed in the centroparietal P500 amplitude. We also found a significant interaction effect between COO and design preference with regard to reaction times. Specifically, participants tended to spend more time making a preference decision when they did not like the product design made in a country with a favorable COO. These results imply that the two cognitive processes, evaluation of COO and formation of design preference, are activated independently at an early stage. It also suggests that these two processes interact with each other toward the end of the decision phase. Together, the results of this study provide neuropsychological evidence supporting a significant role of COO in the formation of design preference. Future studies are required to further delve into other neurophysiological activities associated with the COO effect.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894599981&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84894599981&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000102

DO - 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000102

M3 - Article

C2 - 24518230

AN - SCOPUS:84894599981

VL - 25

SP - 274

EP - 278

JO - NeuroReport

JF - NeuroReport

SN - 0959-4965

IS - 4

ER -