Non-ablative 1550 nm erbium-glass and ablative 10,600 nm carbon dioxide fractional lasers for various types of scars in asian people: Evaluation of 100 patients

Suhyun Cho, Jin Young Jung, Jung U. Shin, JuHee Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: We compared the efficacy and safety of treatments with photothermolysis systems (FPS) and carbon dioxide fractional laser system (CO2 FS) for various types of scars in Asians. Background data: Concerns regarding the cosmetic outcomes of scar treatment are increasing, and non-ablative 1550 nm erbium-glass FPS and 10,600 nm CO2 FS have been effectively used to improve the appearance of various types of scars. Methods: One hundred patients with various types of scars were enrolled. The laser devices were chosen individually, based on the characteristics of the scars. We used a quintile grading scale for evaluations. Results: At 3 months after treatment, the mean grade of improvement based on clinical assessment was 2.64±0.76 for FPS, 2.60±0.68 for CO2 FS, and 2.94±0.83 for combination therapy (p=0.249). The mean grade of improvement was higher in patients who received treatment within 3 years of scar development (2.84±0.69) than in patients who received treatment >3 years after scar development (2.51±0.82; p=0.042). Conclusions: FPS and CO2 FS were both effective and safe for the treatment of scars, and can also be used together safely as a combination treatment. The proper laser device and proper treatment time should be decided considering various factors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)42-46
Number of pages5
JournalPhotomedicine and Laser Surgery
Volume32
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014 Jan 14

Fingerprint

Erbium
Gas Lasers
Cicatrix
Glass
Carbon dioxide
Lasers
Therapeutics
Equipment and Supplies
Cosmetics
Safety

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

@article{9ff8e5cb7bc148bda2f2d2d85fac5643,
title = "Non-ablative 1550 nm erbium-glass and ablative 10,600 nm carbon dioxide fractional lasers for various types of scars in asian people: Evaluation of 100 patients",
abstract = "Objective: We compared the efficacy and safety of treatments with photothermolysis systems (FPS) and carbon dioxide fractional laser system (CO2 FS) for various types of scars in Asians. Background data: Concerns regarding the cosmetic outcomes of scar treatment are increasing, and non-ablative 1550 nm erbium-glass FPS and 10,600 nm CO2 FS have been effectively used to improve the appearance of various types of scars. Methods: One hundred patients with various types of scars were enrolled. The laser devices were chosen individually, based on the characteristics of the scars. We used a quintile grading scale for evaluations. Results: At 3 months after treatment, the mean grade of improvement based on clinical assessment was 2.64±0.76 for FPS, 2.60±0.68 for CO2 FS, and 2.94±0.83 for combination therapy (p=0.249). The mean grade of improvement was higher in patients who received treatment within 3 years of scar development (2.84±0.69) than in patients who received treatment >3 years after scar development (2.51±0.82; p=0.042). Conclusions: FPS and CO2 FS were both effective and safe for the treatment of scars, and can also be used together safely as a combination treatment. The proper laser device and proper treatment time should be decided considering various factors.",
author = "Suhyun Cho and Jung, {Jin Young} and Shin, {Jung U.} and JuHee Lee",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "14",
doi = "10.1089/pho.2013.3608",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "42--46",
journal = "Photomedicine and Laser Surgery",
issn = "1549-5418",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Non-ablative 1550 nm erbium-glass and ablative 10,600 nm carbon dioxide fractional lasers for various types of scars in asian people : Evaluation of 100 patients. / Cho, Suhyun; Jung, Jin Young; Shin, Jung U.; Lee, JuHee.

In: Photomedicine and Laser Surgery, Vol. 32, No. 1, 14.01.2014, p. 42-46.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Non-ablative 1550 nm erbium-glass and ablative 10,600 nm carbon dioxide fractional lasers for various types of scars in asian people

T2 - Evaluation of 100 patients

AU - Cho, Suhyun

AU - Jung, Jin Young

AU - Shin, Jung U.

AU - Lee, JuHee

PY - 2014/1/14

Y1 - 2014/1/14

N2 - Objective: We compared the efficacy and safety of treatments with photothermolysis systems (FPS) and carbon dioxide fractional laser system (CO2 FS) for various types of scars in Asians. Background data: Concerns regarding the cosmetic outcomes of scar treatment are increasing, and non-ablative 1550 nm erbium-glass FPS and 10,600 nm CO2 FS have been effectively used to improve the appearance of various types of scars. Methods: One hundred patients with various types of scars were enrolled. The laser devices were chosen individually, based on the characteristics of the scars. We used a quintile grading scale for evaluations. Results: At 3 months after treatment, the mean grade of improvement based on clinical assessment was 2.64±0.76 for FPS, 2.60±0.68 for CO2 FS, and 2.94±0.83 for combination therapy (p=0.249). The mean grade of improvement was higher in patients who received treatment within 3 years of scar development (2.84±0.69) than in patients who received treatment >3 years after scar development (2.51±0.82; p=0.042). Conclusions: FPS and CO2 FS were both effective and safe for the treatment of scars, and can also be used together safely as a combination treatment. The proper laser device and proper treatment time should be decided considering various factors.

AB - Objective: We compared the efficacy and safety of treatments with photothermolysis systems (FPS) and carbon dioxide fractional laser system (CO2 FS) for various types of scars in Asians. Background data: Concerns regarding the cosmetic outcomes of scar treatment are increasing, and non-ablative 1550 nm erbium-glass FPS and 10,600 nm CO2 FS have been effectively used to improve the appearance of various types of scars. Methods: One hundred patients with various types of scars were enrolled. The laser devices were chosen individually, based on the characteristics of the scars. We used a quintile grading scale for evaluations. Results: At 3 months after treatment, the mean grade of improvement based on clinical assessment was 2.64±0.76 for FPS, 2.60±0.68 for CO2 FS, and 2.94±0.83 for combination therapy (p=0.249). The mean grade of improvement was higher in patients who received treatment within 3 years of scar development (2.84±0.69) than in patients who received treatment >3 years after scar development (2.51±0.82; p=0.042). Conclusions: FPS and CO2 FS were both effective and safe for the treatment of scars, and can also be used together safely as a combination treatment. The proper laser device and proper treatment time should be decided considering various factors.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84891867119&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84891867119&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/pho.2013.3608

DO - 10.1089/pho.2013.3608

M3 - Article

C2 - 24359265

AN - SCOPUS:84891867119

VL - 32

SP - 42

EP - 46

JO - Photomedicine and Laser Surgery

JF - Photomedicine and Laser Surgery

SN - 1549-5418

IS - 1

ER -