North Atlantic observations sharpen meridional overturning projections

R. Olson, S. I. An, Y. Fan, J. P. Evans, L. Caesar

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)


Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) projections are uncertain due to both model errors, as well as internal climate variability. An AMOC slowdown projected by many climate models is likely to have considerable effects on many aspects of global and North Atlantic climate. Previous studies to make probabilistic AMOC projections have broken new ground. However, they do not drift-correct or cross-validate the projections, and do not fully account for internal variability. Furthermore, they consider a limited subset of models, and ignore the skill of models at representing the temporal North Atlantic dynamics. We improve on previous work by applying Bayesian Model Averaging to weight 13 Coupled Model Intercomparison Project phase 5 models by their skill at modeling the AMOC strength, and its temporal dynamics, as approximated by the northern North-Atlantic temperature-based AMOC Index. We make drift-corrected projections accounting for structural model errors, and for the internal variability. Cross-validation experiments give approximately correct empirical coverage probabilities, which validates our method. Our results present more evidence that AMOC likely already started slowing down. While weighting considerably moderates and sharpens our projections, our results are at low end of previously published estimates. We project mean AMOC changes between periods 1960–1999 and 2060–2099 of −4.0 Sv and −6.8 Sv for RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 emissions scenarios respectively. The corresponding average 90% credible intervals for our weighted experiments are [−7.2, −1.2] and [−10.5, −3.7] Sv respectively for the two scenarios.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4171-4188
Number of pages18
JournalClimate Dynamics
Issue number11-12
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Jun 1

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
CSIRO and BOM/Australia CSIRO and BOM/Australia Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis/Canada National Center for Atmospheric Research/USA National Science Foundation, Department of Energy, National Center for Atmospheric Research/USA National Science Foundation, Department of Energy, National Center for Atmospheric Research/USA Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory/USA Institute for Numerical Mathematics/Russia Max Planck Institute for Meteorology (MPI-M)/Germany Max Planck Institute for Meteorology (MPI-M)/Germany Meteorological Research Institute/Japan Norwegian Climate Centre/Norway Norwegian Climate Centre/Norway

Funding Information:
Acknowledgements For their roles in producing, coordinating, and making available the CMIP5 model output, we acknowledge the climate modeling groups (listed in Table 1), the World Climate Research Programme’s (WCRP) Working Group on Coupled Modelling (WGCM), and the Global Organization for Earth System Science Portals (GO-ESSP). Some data used here has been downloaded from the German Climate Computing Centre (DKRZ), with funding from the Federal Ministry for Education and Research. Jong-Soo Shin and Eun-Sook Heo provided technical assistance with downloading model output, and code debugging, respectively. Fruitful conversations with Stefan Rahmstorf and Axel Timmermann are gratefully acknowledged. S.-I. An and R. Olson were supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea Grant funded by the Korean Government (MEST, NRF-2009-0093069).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Atmospheric Science


Dive into the research topics of 'North Atlantic observations sharpen meridional overturning projections'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this