On the use of a spin-echo based double inversion recovery acquisition for the measurement of cortical brain thickness

Yoonho Nam, Eung Yeop Kim, Donghyun Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether a spin-echo-based sequence, which are inherently insensitive to magnetic field inhomogeneity, can be used for brain cortical thickness measurement studies. Materials and Methods: By using a double inversion recovery (DIR) spin-echo-based sequence, cortical thickness estimates were performed from data acquired from seven healthy volunteers. The cortical thickness was also calculated from data acquired using an MPRAGE sequence and the Bland-Altman analysis was performed for comparison of the two methods. The average signal and contrast to noise ratios (SNR, CNR) of the two methods were also calculated. Results: The bias over the entire brain between DIR and MPRAGE was 0.87 ± 0.08 mm. The bias calculated in the major regional lobes were temporal: 0.76 ± 0.09 mm, frontal: 0.89 ± 0.07 mm, parietal: 0.92 ± 0.10 mm, occipital: 0.75 ± 0.12 mm, and cingulate: 0.79 ± 0.10 mm. This thickness difference was due mainly to the boundary difference in the MPRAGE and DIR at the grey matter/cerebral spinal fluid (GM/CSF) regions. The mean SNR and CNR was CNRMPRAGE = 47.8 ± 8.4 and CNR DIR = 19.2 ± 2.9, SNRMPRAGE = 76.8 ± 10.5 and SNRDIR = 21.1 ± 2.8. Conclusion: The study suggests that cortical thickness measurements can be performed using a DIR spin-echo sequence, which is inherently immune to main field inhomogeneity. Larger thickness measurements were consistently observed in DIR compared with MPRAGE.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1218-1223
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Volume33
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 May 1

Fingerprint

Brain
Signal-To-Noise Ratio
Temporal Lobe
Magnetic Fields
Healthy Volunteers
Gray Matter

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

@article{3626817f884b48ac82affc59b63c5c6a,
title = "On the use of a spin-echo based double inversion recovery acquisition for the measurement of cortical brain thickness",
abstract = "Purpose: To determine whether a spin-echo-based sequence, which are inherently insensitive to magnetic field inhomogeneity, can be used for brain cortical thickness measurement studies. Materials and Methods: By using a double inversion recovery (DIR) spin-echo-based sequence, cortical thickness estimates were performed from data acquired from seven healthy volunteers. The cortical thickness was also calculated from data acquired using an MPRAGE sequence and the Bland-Altman analysis was performed for comparison of the two methods. The average signal and contrast to noise ratios (SNR, CNR) of the two methods were also calculated. Results: The bias over the entire brain between DIR and MPRAGE was 0.87 ± 0.08 mm. The bias calculated in the major regional lobes were temporal: 0.76 ± 0.09 mm, frontal: 0.89 ± 0.07 mm, parietal: 0.92 ± 0.10 mm, occipital: 0.75 ± 0.12 mm, and cingulate: 0.79 ± 0.10 mm. This thickness difference was due mainly to the boundary difference in the MPRAGE and DIR at the grey matter/cerebral spinal fluid (GM/CSF) regions. The mean SNR and CNR was CNRMPRAGE = 47.8 ± 8.4 and CNR DIR = 19.2 ± 2.9, SNRMPRAGE = 76.8 ± 10.5 and SNRDIR = 21.1 ± 2.8. Conclusion: The study suggests that cortical thickness measurements can be performed using a DIR spin-echo sequence, which is inherently immune to main field inhomogeneity. Larger thickness measurements were consistently observed in DIR compared with MPRAGE.",
author = "Yoonho Nam and Kim, {Eung Yeop} and Donghyun Kim",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/jmri.22536",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "1218--1223",
journal = "Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging",
issn = "1053-1807",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Inc.",
number = "5",

}

On the use of a spin-echo based double inversion recovery acquisition for the measurement of cortical brain thickness. / Nam, Yoonho; Kim, Eung Yeop; Kim, Donghyun.

In: Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Vol. 33, No. 5, 01.05.2011, p. 1218-1223.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the use of a spin-echo based double inversion recovery acquisition for the measurement of cortical brain thickness

AU - Nam, Yoonho

AU - Kim, Eung Yeop

AU - Kim, Donghyun

PY - 2011/5/1

Y1 - 2011/5/1

N2 - Purpose: To determine whether a spin-echo-based sequence, which are inherently insensitive to magnetic field inhomogeneity, can be used for brain cortical thickness measurement studies. Materials and Methods: By using a double inversion recovery (DIR) spin-echo-based sequence, cortical thickness estimates were performed from data acquired from seven healthy volunteers. The cortical thickness was also calculated from data acquired using an MPRAGE sequence and the Bland-Altman analysis was performed for comparison of the two methods. The average signal and contrast to noise ratios (SNR, CNR) of the two methods were also calculated. Results: The bias over the entire brain between DIR and MPRAGE was 0.87 ± 0.08 mm. The bias calculated in the major regional lobes were temporal: 0.76 ± 0.09 mm, frontal: 0.89 ± 0.07 mm, parietal: 0.92 ± 0.10 mm, occipital: 0.75 ± 0.12 mm, and cingulate: 0.79 ± 0.10 mm. This thickness difference was due mainly to the boundary difference in the MPRAGE and DIR at the grey matter/cerebral spinal fluid (GM/CSF) regions. The mean SNR and CNR was CNRMPRAGE = 47.8 ± 8.4 and CNR DIR = 19.2 ± 2.9, SNRMPRAGE = 76.8 ± 10.5 and SNRDIR = 21.1 ± 2.8. Conclusion: The study suggests that cortical thickness measurements can be performed using a DIR spin-echo sequence, which is inherently immune to main field inhomogeneity. Larger thickness measurements were consistently observed in DIR compared with MPRAGE.

AB - Purpose: To determine whether a spin-echo-based sequence, which are inherently insensitive to magnetic field inhomogeneity, can be used for brain cortical thickness measurement studies. Materials and Methods: By using a double inversion recovery (DIR) spin-echo-based sequence, cortical thickness estimates were performed from data acquired from seven healthy volunteers. The cortical thickness was also calculated from data acquired using an MPRAGE sequence and the Bland-Altman analysis was performed for comparison of the two methods. The average signal and contrast to noise ratios (SNR, CNR) of the two methods were also calculated. Results: The bias over the entire brain between DIR and MPRAGE was 0.87 ± 0.08 mm. The bias calculated in the major regional lobes were temporal: 0.76 ± 0.09 mm, frontal: 0.89 ± 0.07 mm, parietal: 0.92 ± 0.10 mm, occipital: 0.75 ± 0.12 mm, and cingulate: 0.79 ± 0.10 mm. This thickness difference was due mainly to the boundary difference in the MPRAGE and DIR at the grey matter/cerebral spinal fluid (GM/CSF) regions. The mean SNR and CNR was CNRMPRAGE = 47.8 ± 8.4 and CNR DIR = 19.2 ± 2.9, SNRMPRAGE = 76.8 ± 10.5 and SNRDIR = 21.1 ± 2.8. Conclusion: The study suggests that cortical thickness measurements can be performed using a DIR spin-echo sequence, which is inherently immune to main field inhomogeneity. Larger thickness measurements were consistently observed in DIR compared with MPRAGE.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955428579&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79955428579&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jmri.22536

DO - 10.1002/jmri.22536

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 1218

EP - 1223

JO - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

JF - Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

SN - 1053-1807

IS - 5

ER -