Open versus robotic radical prostatectomy: A prospective analysis based on a single surgeon's experience

Won Sik Ham, Sung Yul Park, Won Tae Kim, Kyo Chul Koo, Yong Seung Lee, Youngdeuk Choi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The background of this study is to compare prospectively the oncological and functional results of open radical prostatectomy (OP) and robotic prostatectomy (RP) from the experience of a single surgeon. Between June 2002 and June 2007, 422 patients underwent radical prostatectomy (OP 199, RP 223). We divided OP patients into 89 early cases (OP-I) and 110 late cases (OP-II) before and after introduction of a robotic system, and RP patients into 35 early cases (RP-I) and 188 late cases (RP-II). Functional outcomes were measured by use of validated questionnaires completed by the patients. There were no significant differences in preoperative characteristics among the four groups, except that RP-I patients had lower biopsy Gleason scores. In the RP groups the mean estimated blood loss was lower and mean durations of hospital stay and bladder catheterization were shorter compared to those of the OP groups. The frequency of intraoperative complications was significantly lower in the RP-II group. The positive surgical margin rates in the RP-II group were similar to or lower than those in the OP groups when stratified by pathologic stage T2 and T3. From one month after surgery, RP-II patients had higher continence rates than OP-II patients. For patients ≤60 years old, recovery of potency was better in the RP-II group. To conclude, RP by an experienced surgeon may have a similar or lower positive surgical margin rate than OP. Additionally, RP may lead to a shorter duration of bladder catheterization and hospital stay and better recovery of continence and potency than obtainable by OP.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)235-241
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Robotic Surgery
Volume2
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008 Dec 1

Fingerprint

Robotics
Prostatectomy
Surgeons
Catheterization
Length of Stay
Urinary Bladder

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Surgery
  • Health Informatics

Cite this

Ham, Won Sik ; Park, Sung Yul ; Kim, Won Tae ; Koo, Kyo Chul ; Lee, Yong Seung ; Choi, Youngdeuk. / Open versus robotic radical prostatectomy : A prospective analysis based on a single surgeon's experience. In: Journal of Robotic Surgery. 2008 ; Vol. 2, No. 4. pp. 235-241.
@article{b1ec43173ec847a1bab6ac27cfdda63d,
title = "Open versus robotic radical prostatectomy: A prospective analysis based on a single surgeon's experience",
abstract = "The background of this study is to compare prospectively the oncological and functional results of open radical prostatectomy (OP) and robotic prostatectomy (RP) from the experience of a single surgeon. Between June 2002 and June 2007, 422 patients underwent radical prostatectomy (OP 199, RP 223). We divided OP patients into 89 early cases (OP-I) and 110 late cases (OP-II) before and after introduction of a robotic system, and RP patients into 35 early cases (RP-I) and 188 late cases (RP-II). Functional outcomes were measured by use of validated questionnaires completed by the patients. There were no significant differences in preoperative characteristics among the four groups, except that RP-I patients had lower biopsy Gleason scores. In the RP groups the mean estimated blood loss was lower and mean durations of hospital stay and bladder catheterization were shorter compared to those of the OP groups. The frequency of intraoperative complications was significantly lower in the RP-II group. The positive surgical margin rates in the RP-II group were similar to or lower than those in the OP groups when stratified by pathologic stage T2 and T3. From one month after surgery, RP-II patients had higher continence rates than OP-II patients. For patients ≤60 years old, recovery of potency was better in the RP-II group. To conclude, RP by an experienced surgeon may have a similar or lower positive surgical margin rate than OP. Additionally, RP may lead to a shorter duration of bladder catheterization and hospital stay and better recovery of continence and potency than obtainable by OP.",
author = "Ham, {Won Sik} and Park, {Sung Yul} and Kim, {Won Tae} and Koo, {Kyo Chul} and Lee, {Yong Seung} and Youngdeuk Choi",
year = "2008",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s11701-008-0111-9",
language = "English",
volume = "2",
pages = "235--241",
journal = "Journal of Robotic Surgery",
issn = "1863-2483",
publisher = "Springer London",
number = "4",

}

Open versus robotic radical prostatectomy : A prospective analysis based on a single surgeon's experience. / Ham, Won Sik; Park, Sung Yul; Kim, Won Tae; Koo, Kyo Chul; Lee, Yong Seung; Choi, Youngdeuk.

In: Journal of Robotic Surgery, Vol. 2, No. 4, 01.12.2008, p. 235-241.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Open versus robotic radical prostatectomy

T2 - A prospective analysis based on a single surgeon's experience

AU - Ham, Won Sik

AU - Park, Sung Yul

AU - Kim, Won Tae

AU - Koo, Kyo Chul

AU - Lee, Yong Seung

AU - Choi, Youngdeuk

PY - 2008/12/1

Y1 - 2008/12/1

N2 - The background of this study is to compare prospectively the oncological and functional results of open radical prostatectomy (OP) and robotic prostatectomy (RP) from the experience of a single surgeon. Between June 2002 and June 2007, 422 patients underwent radical prostatectomy (OP 199, RP 223). We divided OP patients into 89 early cases (OP-I) and 110 late cases (OP-II) before and after introduction of a robotic system, and RP patients into 35 early cases (RP-I) and 188 late cases (RP-II). Functional outcomes were measured by use of validated questionnaires completed by the patients. There were no significant differences in preoperative characteristics among the four groups, except that RP-I patients had lower biopsy Gleason scores. In the RP groups the mean estimated blood loss was lower and mean durations of hospital stay and bladder catheterization were shorter compared to those of the OP groups. The frequency of intraoperative complications was significantly lower in the RP-II group. The positive surgical margin rates in the RP-II group were similar to or lower than those in the OP groups when stratified by pathologic stage T2 and T3. From one month after surgery, RP-II patients had higher continence rates than OP-II patients. For patients ≤60 years old, recovery of potency was better in the RP-II group. To conclude, RP by an experienced surgeon may have a similar or lower positive surgical margin rate than OP. Additionally, RP may lead to a shorter duration of bladder catheterization and hospital stay and better recovery of continence and potency than obtainable by OP.

AB - The background of this study is to compare prospectively the oncological and functional results of open radical prostatectomy (OP) and robotic prostatectomy (RP) from the experience of a single surgeon. Between June 2002 and June 2007, 422 patients underwent radical prostatectomy (OP 199, RP 223). We divided OP patients into 89 early cases (OP-I) and 110 late cases (OP-II) before and after introduction of a robotic system, and RP patients into 35 early cases (RP-I) and 188 late cases (RP-II). Functional outcomes were measured by use of validated questionnaires completed by the patients. There were no significant differences in preoperative characteristics among the four groups, except that RP-I patients had lower biopsy Gleason scores. In the RP groups the mean estimated blood loss was lower and mean durations of hospital stay and bladder catheterization were shorter compared to those of the OP groups. The frequency of intraoperative complications was significantly lower in the RP-II group. The positive surgical margin rates in the RP-II group were similar to or lower than those in the OP groups when stratified by pathologic stage T2 and T3. From one month after surgery, RP-II patients had higher continence rates than OP-II patients. For patients ≤60 years old, recovery of potency was better in the RP-II group. To conclude, RP by an experienced surgeon may have a similar or lower positive surgical margin rate than OP. Additionally, RP may lead to a shorter duration of bladder catheterization and hospital stay and better recovery of continence and potency than obtainable by OP.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57249089061&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57249089061&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s11701-008-0111-9

DO - 10.1007/s11701-008-0111-9

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:57249089061

VL - 2

SP - 235

EP - 241

JO - Journal of Robotic Surgery

JF - Journal of Robotic Surgery

SN - 1863-2483

IS - 4

ER -