Optimized extraction of phospholipids and lysophospholipids for nanoflow liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry

Seul Kee Byeon, Ju Yong Lee, Myeong Hee Moon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The efficiencies of four different methods for the extraction of phospholipids (PLs) and lysophospholipids (LPLs) from human plasma samples were examined by comparing extraction recovery values using nanoflow liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (nLC-ESI-MS). For recovery measurements, six PL and six LPL standards of different head groups were spiked into a human plasma sample, and the peak areas of each individual species after extraction were measured from the chromatograms of the nLC-ESI-MS runs. Recovery was calculated by comparing the peak area of an extracted standard species with that of the same species' spike after extraction of the same plasma sample. For lipid extraction, four different extraction methods were examined: three based on the Folch method with different organic solvents such as CHCl3, methyl-tert-butyl ether (MTBE), and MTBE/CH3OH, and one relatively fast method involving CH3OH only. Evaluations of recovery showed that the modified Folch method with MTBE/CH3OH proposed in this study was effective for extracting most PL and LPL standards. Then, the four extraction methods were compared with the identified numbers of plasma PLs and LPLs, of which molecular structures can be confirmed by data-dependent, collision-induced dissociation experiments during nLC-ESI-MS-MS. These results demonstrated that the proposed method yielded the identification of 54 LPLs and 66 PLs from a plasma sample, which was the highest identification rate among the four methods.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)451-458
Number of pages8
JournalAnalyst
Volume137
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Jan 21

Fingerprint

Lysophospholipids
Electrospray ionization
Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry
Phospholipids
Liquid chromatography
Tandem Mass Spectrometry
phospholipid
Liquid Chromatography
Mass spectrometry
liquid chromatography
ionization
mass spectrometry
MTBE
plasma
Plasma (human)
Recovery
Ethers
extraction method
Plasmas
method

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Analytical Chemistry
  • Biochemistry
  • Environmental Chemistry
  • Spectroscopy
  • Electrochemistry

Cite this

@article{f5ea2d9c686f4dec9fb2d412ec92ab4a,
title = "Optimized extraction of phospholipids and lysophospholipids for nanoflow liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry",
abstract = "The efficiencies of four different methods for the extraction of phospholipids (PLs) and lysophospholipids (LPLs) from human plasma samples were examined by comparing extraction recovery values using nanoflow liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (nLC-ESI-MS). For recovery measurements, six PL and six LPL standards of different head groups were spiked into a human plasma sample, and the peak areas of each individual species after extraction were measured from the chromatograms of the nLC-ESI-MS runs. Recovery was calculated by comparing the peak area of an extracted standard species with that of the same species' spike after extraction of the same plasma sample. For lipid extraction, four different extraction methods were examined: three based on the Folch method with different organic solvents such as CHCl3, methyl-tert-butyl ether (MTBE), and MTBE/CH3OH, and one relatively fast method involving CH3OH only. Evaluations of recovery showed that the modified Folch method with MTBE/CH3OH proposed in this study was effective for extracting most PL and LPL standards. Then, the four extraction methods were compared with the identified numbers of plasma PLs and LPLs, of which molecular structures can be confirmed by data-dependent, collision-induced dissociation experiments during nLC-ESI-MS-MS. These results demonstrated that the proposed method yielded the identification of 54 LPLs and 66 PLs from a plasma sample, which was the highest identification rate among the four methods.",
author = "Byeon, {Seul Kee} and Lee, {Ju Yong} and Moon, {Myeong Hee}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1039/c1an15920h",
language = "English",
volume = "137",
pages = "451--458",
journal = "The Analyst",
issn = "0003-2654",
publisher = "Royal Society of Chemistry",
number = "2",

}

Optimized extraction of phospholipids and lysophospholipids for nanoflow liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry. / Byeon, Seul Kee; Lee, Ju Yong; Moon, Myeong Hee.

In: Analyst, Vol. 137, No. 2, 21.01.2012, p. 451-458.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimized extraction of phospholipids and lysophospholipids for nanoflow liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry

AU - Byeon, Seul Kee

AU - Lee, Ju Yong

AU - Moon, Myeong Hee

PY - 2012/1/21

Y1 - 2012/1/21

N2 - The efficiencies of four different methods for the extraction of phospholipids (PLs) and lysophospholipids (LPLs) from human plasma samples were examined by comparing extraction recovery values using nanoflow liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (nLC-ESI-MS). For recovery measurements, six PL and six LPL standards of different head groups were spiked into a human plasma sample, and the peak areas of each individual species after extraction were measured from the chromatograms of the nLC-ESI-MS runs. Recovery was calculated by comparing the peak area of an extracted standard species with that of the same species' spike after extraction of the same plasma sample. For lipid extraction, four different extraction methods were examined: three based on the Folch method with different organic solvents such as CHCl3, methyl-tert-butyl ether (MTBE), and MTBE/CH3OH, and one relatively fast method involving CH3OH only. Evaluations of recovery showed that the modified Folch method with MTBE/CH3OH proposed in this study was effective for extracting most PL and LPL standards. Then, the four extraction methods were compared with the identified numbers of plasma PLs and LPLs, of which molecular structures can be confirmed by data-dependent, collision-induced dissociation experiments during nLC-ESI-MS-MS. These results demonstrated that the proposed method yielded the identification of 54 LPLs and 66 PLs from a plasma sample, which was the highest identification rate among the four methods.

AB - The efficiencies of four different methods for the extraction of phospholipids (PLs) and lysophospholipids (LPLs) from human plasma samples were examined by comparing extraction recovery values using nanoflow liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry (nLC-ESI-MS). For recovery measurements, six PL and six LPL standards of different head groups were spiked into a human plasma sample, and the peak areas of each individual species after extraction were measured from the chromatograms of the nLC-ESI-MS runs. Recovery was calculated by comparing the peak area of an extracted standard species with that of the same species' spike after extraction of the same plasma sample. For lipid extraction, four different extraction methods were examined: three based on the Folch method with different organic solvents such as CHCl3, methyl-tert-butyl ether (MTBE), and MTBE/CH3OH, and one relatively fast method involving CH3OH only. Evaluations of recovery showed that the modified Folch method with MTBE/CH3OH proposed in this study was effective for extracting most PL and LPL standards. Then, the four extraction methods were compared with the identified numbers of plasma PLs and LPLs, of which molecular structures can be confirmed by data-dependent, collision-induced dissociation experiments during nLC-ESI-MS-MS. These results demonstrated that the proposed method yielded the identification of 54 LPLs and 66 PLs from a plasma sample, which was the highest identification rate among the four methods.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=83455185997&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=83455185997&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1039/c1an15920h

DO - 10.1039/c1an15920h

M3 - Article

C2 - 22108841

AN - SCOPUS:83455185997

VL - 137

SP - 451

EP - 458

JO - The Analyst

JF - The Analyst

SN - 0003-2654

IS - 2

ER -