Paranoid beliefs and realistic expectations of victimization: Data from the survey of police-public encounters

Hyun Jin Jun, Boyoung Nam, Lisa Fedina, Melissa Edmondson Smith, Jason Schiffman, Bruce Link, Jordan E. DeVylder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The anticipation of threat or victimization is a core feature of paranoia. Cognitive theories of paranoia suggest that paranoid thoughts may arise as a psychological response to trauma exposure, which likewise may lead to greater anticipation of subsequent victimization. Little is known, however, about the relation between paranoid beliefs and anticipated victimization when accounting for past victimization experience. The present study aimed to address whether the experiences of past victimization contribute to the link between paranoid beliefs and the anticipation of threat or victimization, with a particular focus on exposure to police violence. Methods: Data were collected through the Survey of Police-Public Encounters (N = 1615), a cross-sectional, general population survey study conducted in four Eastern U.S. cities. Associations between paranoia and anticipated victimization were assessed using linear regression models, with and without adjustment for past victimization exposure. Results: Paranoid beliefs were positively associated with police victimization expectations (β = 0.19, p < 0.001), but these associations were statistically better explained by past exposures to similar victimization such that paranoia was no longer associated with anticipated victimization in adjusted models (β = 0.02, p = 0.451). To assess for the specificity of past exposures to victimization, adjusting for past exposure to intimate partner violence (as a control condition) did not eliminate the association between paranoia and expected police victimization. Conclusions: The overall findings are consistent with cognitive theories of paranoia in which paranoid beliefs may be a severe but normative reaction to past victimization exposures in some cases.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)326-332
Number of pages7
JournalSchizophrenia Research
Volume199
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Sep

Fingerprint

Crime Victims
Police
Paranoid Disorders
Surveys and Questionnaires
Linear Models

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Biological Psychiatry

Cite this

Jun, Hyun Jin ; Nam, Boyoung ; Fedina, Lisa ; Smith, Melissa Edmondson ; Schiffman, Jason ; Link, Bruce ; DeVylder, Jordan E. / Paranoid beliefs and realistic expectations of victimization : Data from the survey of police-public encounters. In: Schizophrenia Research. 2018 ; Vol. 199. pp. 326-332.
@article{831d445e63cf451b8dd39b62d3ae7edd,
title = "Paranoid beliefs and realistic expectations of victimization: Data from the survey of police-public encounters",
abstract = "Background: The anticipation of threat or victimization is a core feature of paranoia. Cognitive theories of paranoia suggest that paranoid thoughts may arise as a psychological response to trauma exposure, which likewise may lead to greater anticipation of subsequent victimization. Little is known, however, about the relation between paranoid beliefs and anticipated victimization when accounting for past victimization experience. The present study aimed to address whether the experiences of past victimization contribute to the link between paranoid beliefs and the anticipation of threat or victimization, with a particular focus on exposure to police violence. Methods: Data were collected through the Survey of Police-Public Encounters (N = 1615), a cross-sectional, general population survey study conducted in four Eastern U.S. cities. Associations between paranoia and anticipated victimization were assessed using linear regression models, with and without adjustment for past victimization exposure. Results: Paranoid beliefs were positively associated with police victimization expectations (β = 0.19, p < 0.001), but these associations were statistically better explained by past exposures to similar victimization such that paranoia was no longer associated with anticipated victimization in adjusted models (β = 0.02, p = 0.451). To assess for the specificity of past exposures to victimization, adjusting for past exposure to intimate partner violence (as a control condition) did not eliminate the association between paranoia and expected police victimization. Conclusions: The overall findings are consistent with cognitive theories of paranoia in which paranoid beliefs may be a severe but normative reaction to past victimization exposures in some cases.",
author = "Jun, {Hyun Jin} and Boyoung Nam and Lisa Fedina and Smith, {Melissa Edmondson} and Jason Schiffman and Bruce Link and DeVylder, {Jordan E.}",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
doi = "10.1016/j.schres.2018.02.046",
language = "English",
volume = "199",
pages = "326--332",
journal = "Schizophrenia Research",
issn = "0920-9964",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Paranoid beliefs and realistic expectations of victimization : Data from the survey of police-public encounters. / Jun, Hyun Jin; Nam, Boyoung; Fedina, Lisa; Smith, Melissa Edmondson; Schiffman, Jason; Link, Bruce; DeVylder, Jordan E.

In: Schizophrenia Research, Vol. 199, 09.2018, p. 326-332.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Paranoid beliefs and realistic expectations of victimization

T2 - Data from the survey of police-public encounters

AU - Jun, Hyun Jin

AU - Nam, Boyoung

AU - Fedina, Lisa

AU - Smith, Melissa Edmondson

AU - Schiffman, Jason

AU - Link, Bruce

AU - DeVylder, Jordan E.

PY - 2018/9

Y1 - 2018/9

N2 - Background: The anticipation of threat or victimization is a core feature of paranoia. Cognitive theories of paranoia suggest that paranoid thoughts may arise as a psychological response to trauma exposure, which likewise may lead to greater anticipation of subsequent victimization. Little is known, however, about the relation between paranoid beliefs and anticipated victimization when accounting for past victimization experience. The present study aimed to address whether the experiences of past victimization contribute to the link between paranoid beliefs and the anticipation of threat or victimization, with a particular focus on exposure to police violence. Methods: Data were collected through the Survey of Police-Public Encounters (N = 1615), a cross-sectional, general population survey study conducted in four Eastern U.S. cities. Associations between paranoia and anticipated victimization were assessed using linear regression models, with and without adjustment for past victimization exposure. Results: Paranoid beliefs were positively associated with police victimization expectations (β = 0.19, p < 0.001), but these associations were statistically better explained by past exposures to similar victimization such that paranoia was no longer associated with anticipated victimization in adjusted models (β = 0.02, p = 0.451). To assess for the specificity of past exposures to victimization, adjusting for past exposure to intimate partner violence (as a control condition) did not eliminate the association between paranoia and expected police victimization. Conclusions: The overall findings are consistent with cognitive theories of paranoia in which paranoid beliefs may be a severe but normative reaction to past victimization exposures in some cases.

AB - Background: The anticipation of threat or victimization is a core feature of paranoia. Cognitive theories of paranoia suggest that paranoid thoughts may arise as a psychological response to trauma exposure, which likewise may lead to greater anticipation of subsequent victimization. Little is known, however, about the relation between paranoid beliefs and anticipated victimization when accounting for past victimization experience. The present study aimed to address whether the experiences of past victimization contribute to the link between paranoid beliefs and the anticipation of threat or victimization, with a particular focus on exposure to police violence. Methods: Data were collected through the Survey of Police-Public Encounters (N = 1615), a cross-sectional, general population survey study conducted in four Eastern U.S. cities. Associations between paranoia and anticipated victimization were assessed using linear regression models, with and without adjustment for past victimization exposure. Results: Paranoid beliefs were positively associated with police victimization expectations (β = 0.19, p < 0.001), but these associations were statistically better explained by past exposures to similar victimization such that paranoia was no longer associated with anticipated victimization in adjusted models (β = 0.02, p = 0.451). To assess for the specificity of past exposures to victimization, adjusting for past exposure to intimate partner violence (as a control condition) did not eliminate the association between paranoia and expected police victimization. Conclusions: The overall findings are consistent with cognitive theories of paranoia in which paranoid beliefs may be a severe but normative reaction to past victimization exposures in some cases.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042915241&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042915241&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.schres.2018.02.046

DO - 10.1016/j.schres.2018.02.046

M3 - Article

C2 - 29525461

AN - SCOPUS:85042915241

VL - 199

SP - 326

EP - 332

JO - Schizophrenia Research

JF - Schizophrenia Research

SN - 0920-9964

ER -