Abstract
The present study was carried out with the aim of evaluating the performance of six different aerosol samplers in terms of mass concentration, particle size distribution, and mass fraction for the international size-sampling conventions. The international size-sampling criteria were defined as inhalable, thoracic, and respirable mass fractions with 50% cutoff at an aerodynamic equivalent diameter of 100 μm, 10 μm, and 4 μm, respectively. Two Andersen, four total suspended particulate (TSP), two RespiCon, four PM10, two DustTrak, and two SidePak samplers were selected and tested to quantitatively estimate human exposure in a carefully controlled particulate matter (PM) test chamber. The overall results indicate that (1) Andersen samplers underestimate total suspended PM and overestimate thoracic and respirable PM due to particle bounce and carryover between stages, (2) TSP samplers provide total suspended PM as reference samplers, (3) TSP samplers quantified by a coulter counter multisizer provide no information below an equivalent spherical diameter of 2 μm and therefore underestimate respirable PM, (4) RespiCon samplers are free from particle bounce as inhalable samplers but underestimate total suspended PM, (5) PM10 samplers overestimate thoracic PM, and (6) DustTrak and SidePak samplers provide relative PM concentrations instead of absolute PM concentrations.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 280-289 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Atmospheric Environment |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2009 Jan 1 |
Fingerprint
All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes
- Environmental Science(all)
- Atmospheric Science
Cite this
}
Performance evaluation of six different aerosol samplers in a particulate matter generation chamber. / Park, Ju Myon; Rock, James C.; Wang, Lingjuan; Seo, Yongchil; Bhatnagar, Amit; Kim, Seongheon.
In: Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 43, No. 2, 01.01.2009, p. 280-289.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
TY - JOUR
T1 - Performance evaluation of six different aerosol samplers in a particulate matter generation chamber
AU - Park, Ju Myon
AU - Rock, James C.
AU - Wang, Lingjuan
AU - Seo, Yongchil
AU - Bhatnagar, Amit
AU - Kim, Seongheon
PY - 2009/1/1
Y1 - 2009/1/1
N2 - The present study was carried out with the aim of evaluating the performance of six different aerosol samplers in terms of mass concentration, particle size distribution, and mass fraction for the international size-sampling conventions. The international size-sampling criteria were defined as inhalable, thoracic, and respirable mass fractions with 50% cutoff at an aerodynamic equivalent diameter of 100 μm, 10 μm, and 4 μm, respectively. Two Andersen, four total suspended particulate (TSP), two RespiCon, four PM10, two DustTrak, and two SidePak samplers were selected and tested to quantitatively estimate human exposure in a carefully controlled particulate matter (PM) test chamber. The overall results indicate that (1) Andersen samplers underestimate total suspended PM and overestimate thoracic and respirable PM due to particle bounce and carryover between stages, (2) TSP samplers provide total suspended PM as reference samplers, (3) TSP samplers quantified by a coulter counter multisizer provide no information below an equivalent spherical diameter of 2 μm and therefore underestimate respirable PM, (4) RespiCon samplers are free from particle bounce as inhalable samplers but underestimate total suspended PM, (5) PM10 samplers overestimate thoracic PM, and (6) DustTrak and SidePak samplers provide relative PM concentrations instead of absolute PM concentrations.
AB - The present study was carried out with the aim of evaluating the performance of six different aerosol samplers in terms of mass concentration, particle size distribution, and mass fraction for the international size-sampling conventions. The international size-sampling criteria were defined as inhalable, thoracic, and respirable mass fractions with 50% cutoff at an aerodynamic equivalent diameter of 100 μm, 10 μm, and 4 μm, respectively. Two Andersen, four total suspended particulate (TSP), two RespiCon, four PM10, two DustTrak, and two SidePak samplers were selected and tested to quantitatively estimate human exposure in a carefully controlled particulate matter (PM) test chamber. The overall results indicate that (1) Andersen samplers underestimate total suspended PM and overestimate thoracic and respirable PM due to particle bounce and carryover between stages, (2) TSP samplers provide total suspended PM as reference samplers, (3) TSP samplers quantified by a coulter counter multisizer provide no information below an equivalent spherical diameter of 2 μm and therefore underestimate respirable PM, (4) RespiCon samplers are free from particle bounce as inhalable samplers but underestimate total suspended PM, (5) PM10 samplers overestimate thoracic PM, and (6) DustTrak and SidePak samplers provide relative PM concentrations instead of absolute PM concentrations.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=57949096309&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=57949096309&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.028
DO - 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2008.09.028
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:57949096309
VL - 43
SP - 280
EP - 289
JO - Atmospheric Environment
JF - Atmospheric Environment
SN - 1352-2310
IS - 2
ER -