Pharmacological interventions for treating chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a Cochrane systematic review

Juan V.A. Franco, Tarek Turk, Jae Hung Jung, Yu Tian Xiao, Stanislav Iakhno, Federico Ignacio Tirapegui, Virginia Garrote, Valeria Vietto

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: To assess the effects of pharmacological therapies for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS). Patients and Methods: We performed a comprehensive search using multiple databases, trial registries, grey literature and conference proceedings with no restrictions on the language of publication or publication status. The date of the latest search of all databases was July 2019. We included randomised controlled trials. Inclusion criteria were men with a diagnosis of CP/CPPS. We included all available pharmacological interventions. Two review authors independently classified studies and abstracted data from the included studies, performed statistical analyses and rated quality of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methods. The primary outcomes were prostatitis symptoms and adverse events. The secondary outcomes were sexual dysfunction, urinary symptoms, quality of life, anxiety and depression. Results: We included 99 unique studies in 9119 men with CP/CPPS, with assessments of 16 types of pharmacological interventions. Most of our comparisons included short-term follow-up information. The median age of the participants was 38 years. Most studies did not specify their funding sources; 21 studies reported funding from pharmaceutical companies. We found low- to very low-quality evidence that α-blockers may reduce prostatitis symptoms based on a reduction in National Institutes of Health – Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI) scores of >2 (but <8) with an increased incidence of minor adverse events such as dizziness and hypotension. Moderate- to low-quality evidence indicates that 5α-reductase inhibitors, antibiotics, anti-inflammatories, and phytotherapy probably cause a small decrease in prostatitis symptoms and may not be associated with a greater incidence of adverse events. Intraprostatic botulinum toxin A (BTA) injection may cause a large reduction in prostatitis symptoms with procedure-related adverse events (haematuria), but pelvic floor muscle BTA injection may not have the same effects (low-quality evidence). Allopurinol may also be ineffective for reducing prostatitis symptoms (low-quality evidence). We assessed a wide range of interventions involving traditional Chinese medicine; low-quality evidence showed they may reduce prostatitis symptoms without an increased incidence in adverse events. Moderate- to high-quality evidence indicates that the following interventions may be ineffective for the reduction of prostatitis symptoms: anticholinergics, Escherichia coli lysate (OM-89), pentosan, and pregabalin. Low- to very low-quality evidence indicates that antidepressants and tanezumab may be ineffective for the reduction of prostatitis symptoms. Low-quality evidence indicates that mepartricin and phosphodiesterase inhibitors may reduce prostatitis symptoms, without an increased incidence in adverse events. Conclusions: Based on the findings of low- to very low-quality evidence, this review found that some pharmacological interventions such as α-blockers may reduce prostatitis symptoms with an increased incidence of minor adverse events such as dizziness and hypotension. Other interventions may cause a reduction in prostatitis symptoms without an increased incidence of adverse events while others were found to be ineffective.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)490-496
Number of pages7
JournalBJU International
Volume125
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020 Apr 1

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We thank the Cochrane Urology Group and our institutions. This review received funding from the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (16? Beca del Consejo de Investigaci?n). A full list of acknowledgments can be found in the full version of the review.

Funding Information:
We thank the Cochrane Urology Group and our institutions. This review received funding from the Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires (16º Beca del Consejo de Investigación). A full list of acknowledgments can be found in the full version of the review.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Authors BJU International © 2020 BJU International Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Urology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Pharmacological interventions for treating chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a Cochrane systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this