PI-RADS version 2: quantitative analysis aids reliable interpretation of diffusion-weighted imaging for prostate cancer

Sung Yoon Park, Su Jin Shin, Dae Chul Jung, Nam Hoon Cho, Young Deuk Choi, Koon Ho Rha, Sung Joon Hong, Young Taik Oh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: To determine whether apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) ratio aids reliable interpretation of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for prostate cancer (PCa). Methods: Seventy-six consecutive patients with PCa who underwent DWI and surgery were included. Based on pathologic tumour location, two readers independently performed DWI scoring according to the revised Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADSv2). ADC ratios of benign to cancerous prostatic tissue were then measured independently and compared between cases showing concordant and discordant DWI scores ≥4. Area under the curve (AUC) and threshold of ADC ratio were analyzed for DWI scores ≥4. Results: The rate of inter-reader disagreement for DWI score ≥4 was 11.8% (9/76). ADC ratios were higher in concordant vs. discordant DWI scores ≥4 (median, 1.7 vs. 1.1–1.2; p < 0.001). For DWI scores ≥4, the AUCs of ADC ratios were 0.970 for reader 1 and 0.959 for reader 2. In patients with an ADC ratio >1.3, the rate of inter-reader disagreement for DWI score ≥4 decreased to 5.9–6.0%. An ADC ratio >1.3 yielded 100% (reader 1, 54/54; reader 2, 51/51) positive predictive value for clinically significant cancer. Conclusion: ADC ratios may be useful for reliable interpretation of DWI score ≥4 in PI-RADSv2. Key points: • The ADC ratio correlated positively with DWI score of PI-RADSv2. • ADC ratio >1.3 was associated with concordant interpretation of DWI score ≥4. • ADC ratio >1.3 was associated with high PPV for clinically significant cancer. • ADC ratio is useful for reliable interpretation of DWI scoring in PI-RADSv2.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2776-2783
Number of pages8
JournalEuropean Radiology
Volume27
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Jul 1

Fingerprint

Prostatic Neoplasms
Neoplasms
Information Systems

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Park, Sung Yoon ; Shin, Su Jin ; Jung, Dae Chul ; Cho, Nam Hoon ; Choi, Young Deuk ; Rha, Koon Ho ; Hong, Sung Joon ; Oh, Young Taik. / PI-RADS version 2 : quantitative analysis aids reliable interpretation of diffusion-weighted imaging for prostate cancer. In: European Radiology. 2017 ; Vol. 27, No. 7. pp. 2776-2783.
@article{d8719db3e0794a7da9fb2a28ae7d9ecf,
title = "PI-RADS version 2: quantitative analysis aids reliable interpretation of diffusion-weighted imaging for prostate cancer",
abstract = "Objectives: To determine whether apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) ratio aids reliable interpretation of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for prostate cancer (PCa). Methods: Seventy-six consecutive patients with PCa who underwent DWI and surgery were included. Based on pathologic tumour location, two readers independently performed DWI scoring according to the revised Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADSv2). ADC ratios of benign to cancerous prostatic tissue were then measured independently and compared between cases showing concordant and discordant DWI scores ≥4. Area under the curve (AUC) and threshold of ADC ratio were analyzed for DWI scores ≥4. Results: The rate of inter-reader disagreement for DWI score ≥4 was 11.8{\%} (9/76). ADC ratios were higher in concordant vs. discordant DWI scores ≥4 (median, 1.7 vs. 1.1–1.2; p < 0.001). For DWI scores ≥4, the AUCs of ADC ratios were 0.970 for reader 1 and 0.959 for reader 2. In patients with an ADC ratio >1.3, the rate of inter-reader disagreement for DWI score ≥4 decreased to 5.9–6.0{\%}. An ADC ratio >1.3 yielded 100{\%} (reader 1, 54/54; reader 2, 51/51) positive predictive value for clinically significant cancer. Conclusion: ADC ratios may be useful for reliable interpretation of DWI score ≥4 in PI-RADSv2. Key points: • The ADC ratio correlated positively with DWI score of PI-RADSv2. • ADC ratio >1.3 was associated with concordant interpretation of DWI score ≥4. • ADC ratio >1.3 was associated with high PPV for clinically significant cancer. • ADC ratio is useful for reliable interpretation of DWI scoring in PI-RADSv2.",
author = "Park, {Sung Yoon} and Shin, {Su Jin} and Jung, {Dae Chul} and Cho, {Nam Hoon} and Choi, {Young Deuk} and Rha, {Koon Ho} and Hong, {Sung Joon} and Oh, {Young Taik}",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/s00330-016-4678-7",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "2776--2783",
journal = "European Radiology",
issn = "0938-7994",
publisher = "Springer Verlag",
number = "7",

}

PI-RADS version 2 : quantitative analysis aids reliable interpretation of diffusion-weighted imaging for prostate cancer. / Park, Sung Yoon; Shin, Su Jin; Jung, Dae Chul; Cho, Nam Hoon; Choi, Young Deuk; Rha, Koon Ho; Hong, Sung Joon; Oh, Young Taik.

In: European Radiology, Vol. 27, No. 7, 01.07.2017, p. 2776-2783.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - PI-RADS version 2

T2 - quantitative analysis aids reliable interpretation of diffusion-weighted imaging for prostate cancer

AU - Park, Sung Yoon

AU - Shin, Su Jin

AU - Jung, Dae Chul

AU - Cho, Nam Hoon

AU - Choi, Young Deuk

AU - Rha, Koon Ho

AU - Hong, Sung Joon

AU - Oh, Young Taik

PY - 2017/7/1

Y1 - 2017/7/1

N2 - Objectives: To determine whether apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) ratio aids reliable interpretation of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for prostate cancer (PCa). Methods: Seventy-six consecutive patients with PCa who underwent DWI and surgery were included. Based on pathologic tumour location, two readers independently performed DWI scoring according to the revised Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADSv2). ADC ratios of benign to cancerous prostatic tissue were then measured independently and compared between cases showing concordant and discordant DWI scores ≥4. Area under the curve (AUC) and threshold of ADC ratio were analyzed for DWI scores ≥4. Results: The rate of inter-reader disagreement for DWI score ≥4 was 11.8% (9/76). ADC ratios were higher in concordant vs. discordant DWI scores ≥4 (median, 1.7 vs. 1.1–1.2; p < 0.001). For DWI scores ≥4, the AUCs of ADC ratios were 0.970 for reader 1 and 0.959 for reader 2. In patients with an ADC ratio >1.3, the rate of inter-reader disagreement for DWI score ≥4 decreased to 5.9–6.0%. An ADC ratio >1.3 yielded 100% (reader 1, 54/54; reader 2, 51/51) positive predictive value for clinically significant cancer. Conclusion: ADC ratios may be useful for reliable interpretation of DWI score ≥4 in PI-RADSv2. Key points: • The ADC ratio correlated positively with DWI score of PI-RADSv2. • ADC ratio >1.3 was associated with concordant interpretation of DWI score ≥4. • ADC ratio >1.3 was associated with high PPV for clinically significant cancer. • ADC ratio is useful for reliable interpretation of DWI scoring in PI-RADSv2.

AB - Objectives: To determine whether apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) ratio aids reliable interpretation of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for prostate cancer (PCa). Methods: Seventy-six consecutive patients with PCa who underwent DWI and surgery were included. Based on pathologic tumour location, two readers independently performed DWI scoring according to the revised Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADSv2). ADC ratios of benign to cancerous prostatic tissue were then measured independently and compared between cases showing concordant and discordant DWI scores ≥4. Area under the curve (AUC) and threshold of ADC ratio were analyzed for DWI scores ≥4. Results: The rate of inter-reader disagreement for DWI score ≥4 was 11.8% (9/76). ADC ratios were higher in concordant vs. discordant DWI scores ≥4 (median, 1.7 vs. 1.1–1.2; p < 0.001). For DWI scores ≥4, the AUCs of ADC ratios were 0.970 for reader 1 and 0.959 for reader 2. In patients with an ADC ratio >1.3, the rate of inter-reader disagreement for DWI score ≥4 decreased to 5.9–6.0%. An ADC ratio >1.3 yielded 100% (reader 1, 54/54; reader 2, 51/51) positive predictive value for clinically significant cancer. Conclusion: ADC ratios may be useful for reliable interpretation of DWI score ≥4 in PI-RADSv2. Key points: • The ADC ratio correlated positively with DWI score of PI-RADSv2. • ADC ratio >1.3 was associated with concordant interpretation of DWI score ≥4. • ADC ratio >1.3 was associated with high PPV for clinically significant cancer. • ADC ratio is useful for reliable interpretation of DWI scoring in PI-RADSv2.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85003864992&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85003864992&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s00330-016-4678-7

DO - 10.1007/s00330-016-4678-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 27957637

AN - SCOPUS:85003864992

VL - 27

SP - 2776

EP - 2783

JO - European Radiology

JF - European Radiology

SN - 0938-7994

IS - 7

ER -