Pilot ability to anticipate the consequences of flight actions as a function of expertise

Stephanie M. Doane, Young Woo Sohn, Mark T. Jodlowski

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The study offers insights into pilot ability to anticipate consequences of actions and how this ability changes with experience. Novice and expert pilots completed trials in which 3 screens depicted a control movement (or control movements), a cockpit flight situation, or a change in flight situation. Changes depicted in the 3rd screen of each trial were consistent, inconsistent with the mental model of the effect of the control movement or movements, or inconsistent with the application of the control movement(s) to the current flight situation. Pilots indicated whether the depicted change was inconsistent or consistent with their expectations, and accuracy of consistency judgments was greater for mental-model than for situation-model inconsistent statements. Experts are more accurate than novices, particularly for trials that involve multiple, meaningfully related control movements. Expert ability to organize information into meaningful units appears to facilitate future flight state projections, and projection failures appear to result from situation- rather than mental-model failures. Actual or potential applications of this research include analysis of flight situation awareness and flight performance errors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)92-103
Number of pages12
JournalHuman Factors
Volume46
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004 Mar 1

Fingerprint

Aptitude
flight
expertise
ability
expert
projection
Flight dynamics
Research
Pilots
performance
experience

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Human Factors and Ergonomics
  • Applied Psychology
  • Behavioral Neuroscience

Cite this

Doane, Stephanie M. ; Sohn, Young Woo ; Jodlowski, Mark T. / Pilot ability to anticipate the consequences of flight actions as a function of expertise. In: Human Factors. 2004 ; Vol. 46, No. 1. pp. 92-103.
@article{1a736d28235c4a438faacf7e45eef282,
title = "Pilot ability to anticipate the consequences of flight actions as a function of expertise",
abstract = "The study offers insights into pilot ability to anticipate consequences of actions and how this ability changes with experience. Novice and expert pilots completed trials in which 3 screens depicted a control movement (or control movements), a cockpit flight situation, or a change in flight situation. Changes depicted in the 3rd screen of each trial were consistent, inconsistent with the mental model of the effect of the control movement or movements, or inconsistent with the application of the control movement(s) to the current flight situation. Pilots indicated whether the depicted change was inconsistent or consistent with their expectations, and accuracy of consistency judgments was greater for mental-model than for situation-model inconsistent statements. Experts are more accurate than novices, particularly for trials that involve multiple, meaningfully related control movements. Expert ability to organize information into meaningful units appears to facilitate future flight state projections, and projection failures appear to result from situation- rather than mental-model failures. Actual or potential applications of this research include analysis of flight situation awareness and flight performance errors.",
author = "Doane, {Stephanie M.} and Sohn, {Young Woo} and Jodlowski, {Mark T.}",
year = "2004",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1518/hfes.46.1.92.30386",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "92--103",
journal = "Human Factors",
issn = "0018-7208",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "1",

}

Pilot ability to anticipate the consequences of flight actions as a function of expertise. / Doane, Stephanie M.; Sohn, Young Woo; Jodlowski, Mark T.

In: Human Factors, Vol. 46, No. 1, 01.03.2004, p. 92-103.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pilot ability to anticipate the consequences of flight actions as a function of expertise

AU - Doane, Stephanie M.

AU - Sohn, Young Woo

AU - Jodlowski, Mark T.

PY - 2004/3/1

Y1 - 2004/3/1

N2 - The study offers insights into pilot ability to anticipate consequences of actions and how this ability changes with experience. Novice and expert pilots completed trials in which 3 screens depicted a control movement (or control movements), a cockpit flight situation, or a change in flight situation. Changes depicted in the 3rd screen of each trial were consistent, inconsistent with the mental model of the effect of the control movement or movements, or inconsistent with the application of the control movement(s) to the current flight situation. Pilots indicated whether the depicted change was inconsistent or consistent with their expectations, and accuracy of consistency judgments was greater for mental-model than for situation-model inconsistent statements. Experts are more accurate than novices, particularly for trials that involve multiple, meaningfully related control movements. Expert ability to organize information into meaningful units appears to facilitate future flight state projections, and projection failures appear to result from situation- rather than mental-model failures. Actual or potential applications of this research include analysis of flight situation awareness and flight performance errors.

AB - The study offers insights into pilot ability to anticipate consequences of actions and how this ability changes with experience. Novice and expert pilots completed trials in which 3 screens depicted a control movement (or control movements), a cockpit flight situation, or a change in flight situation. Changes depicted in the 3rd screen of each trial were consistent, inconsistent with the mental model of the effect of the control movement or movements, or inconsistent with the application of the control movement(s) to the current flight situation. Pilots indicated whether the depicted change was inconsistent or consistent with their expectations, and accuracy of consistency judgments was greater for mental-model than for situation-model inconsistent statements. Experts are more accurate than novices, particularly for trials that involve multiple, meaningfully related control movements. Expert ability to organize information into meaningful units appears to facilitate future flight state projections, and projection failures appear to result from situation- rather than mental-model failures. Actual or potential applications of this research include analysis of flight situation awareness and flight performance errors.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2642542606&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2642542606&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1518/hfes.46.1.92.30386

DO - 10.1518/hfes.46.1.92.30386

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 92

EP - 103

JO - Human Factors

JF - Human Factors

SN - 0018-7208

IS - 1

ER -