Pitfalls, artifacts, and remedies in multi-detector row CT coronary angiography

Hyun Seok Choi, Byoung Wook Choi, Kyu Ok Choe, Donghoon Choi, Kyung Jong Yoo, Myoung In Kim, Jinna Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

96 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Coronary angiography is increasingly performed with multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) in the clinical setting. Successful use of this method, however, depends on the radiologist's knowledge of its potential pitfalls and familiarity with methods for minimizing or avoiding them. To identify artifacts and other pitfalls that commonly degrade image quality and that could result in misinterpretation, contrast-enhanced coronary angiograms acquired with a multi- detector row CT scanner with four detector rows in 110 consecutive patients were analyzed. The problems identified were classified into four broad categories: (a) motion-related artifacts caused by cardiac, pulmonary, or other body motion; (b) beam-hardening effects caused by metallic implants, severe calcifications, or air bubbles in the pulmonary artery that obscured the underlying coronary vessel lumen; (c) structural artifacts produced by adjacent contrast material-filled structures and overlying vessels; and (d) artifacts that resulted from technical errors or limitations. The most frequently observed artifacts were those related to cardiac motion. The most effective methods for minimizing cardiac motion artifacts are (a) premedication with β-blockers to maintain optimal heart rate during scanning and (b) optimal selection of the reconstruction window.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)787-800
Number of pages14
JournalRadiographics
Volume24
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2004 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Coronary Angiography
Artifacts
X-Ray Computed Tomography Scanners
Premedication
Contrast Media
Pulmonary Artery
Computed Tomography Angiography
Coronary Vessels
Angiography
Heart Rate
Air
Tomography
Lung

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Choi, H. S., Choi, B. W., Choe, K. O., Choi, D., Yoo, K. J., Kim, M. I., & Kim, J. (2004). Pitfalls, artifacts, and remedies in multi-detector row CT coronary angiography. Radiographics, 24(3), 787-800. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.243035502
Choi, Hyun Seok ; Choi, Byoung Wook ; Choe, Kyu Ok ; Choi, Donghoon ; Yoo, Kyung Jong ; Kim, Myoung In ; Kim, Jinna. / Pitfalls, artifacts, and remedies in multi-detector row CT coronary angiography. In: Radiographics. 2004 ; Vol. 24, No. 3. pp. 787-800.
@article{26fe6b9d10a84d049ef0026631133df5,
title = "Pitfalls, artifacts, and remedies in multi-detector row CT coronary angiography",
abstract = "Coronary angiography is increasingly performed with multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) in the clinical setting. Successful use of this method, however, depends on the radiologist's knowledge of its potential pitfalls and familiarity with methods for minimizing or avoiding them. To identify artifacts and other pitfalls that commonly degrade image quality and that could result in misinterpretation, contrast-enhanced coronary angiograms acquired with a multi- detector row CT scanner with four detector rows in 110 consecutive patients were analyzed. The problems identified were classified into four broad categories: (a) motion-related artifacts caused by cardiac, pulmonary, or other body motion; (b) beam-hardening effects caused by metallic implants, severe calcifications, or air bubbles in the pulmonary artery that obscured the underlying coronary vessel lumen; (c) structural artifacts produced by adjacent contrast material-filled structures and overlying vessels; and (d) artifacts that resulted from technical errors or limitations. The most frequently observed artifacts were those related to cardiac motion. The most effective methods for minimizing cardiac motion artifacts are (a) premedication with β-blockers to maintain optimal heart rate during scanning and (b) optimal selection of the reconstruction window.",
author = "Choi, {Hyun Seok} and Choi, {Byoung Wook} and Choe, {Kyu Ok} and Donghoon Choi and Yoo, {Kyung Jong} and Kim, {Myoung In} and Jinna Kim",
year = "2004",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1148/rg.243035502",
language = "English",
volume = "24",
pages = "787--800",
journal = "Radiographics",
issn = "0271-5333",
publisher = "Radiological Society of North America Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Choi, HS, Choi, BW, Choe, KO, Choi, D, Yoo, KJ, Kim, MI & Kim, J 2004, 'Pitfalls, artifacts, and remedies in multi-detector row CT coronary angiography', Radiographics, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 787-800. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.243035502

Pitfalls, artifacts, and remedies in multi-detector row CT coronary angiography. / Choi, Hyun Seok; Choi, Byoung Wook; Choe, Kyu Ok; Choi, Donghoon; Yoo, Kyung Jong; Kim, Myoung In; Kim, Jinna.

In: Radiographics, Vol. 24, No. 3, 01.01.2004, p. 787-800.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Pitfalls, artifacts, and remedies in multi-detector row CT coronary angiography

AU - Choi, Hyun Seok

AU - Choi, Byoung Wook

AU - Choe, Kyu Ok

AU - Choi, Donghoon

AU - Yoo, Kyung Jong

AU - Kim, Myoung In

AU - Kim, Jinna

PY - 2004/1/1

Y1 - 2004/1/1

N2 - Coronary angiography is increasingly performed with multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) in the clinical setting. Successful use of this method, however, depends on the radiologist's knowledge of its potential pitfalls and familiarity with methods for minimizing or avoiding them. To identify artifacts and other pitfalls that commonly degrade image quality and that could result in misinterpretation, contrast-enhanced coronary angiograms acquired with a multi- detector row CT scanner with four detector rows in 110 consecutive patients were analyzed. The problems identified were classified into four broad categories: (a) motion-related artifacts caused by cardiac, pulmonary, or other body motion; (b) beam-hardening effects caused by metallic implants, severe calcifications, or air bubbles in the pulmonary artery that obscured the underlying coronary vessel lumen; (c) structural artifacts produced by adjacent contrast material-filled structures and overlying vessels; and (d) artifacts that resulted from technical errors or limitations. The most frequently observed artifacts were those related to cardiac motion. The most effective methods for minimizing cardiac motion artifacts are (a) premedication with β-blockers to maintain optimal heart rate during scanning and (b) optimal selection of the reconstruction window.

AB - Coronary angiography is increasingly performed with multi-detector row computed tomography (CT) in the clinical setting. Successful use of this method, however, depends on the radiologist's knowledge of its potential pitfalls and familiarity with methods for minimizing or avoiding them. To identify artifacts and other pitfalls that commonly degrade image quality and that could result in misinterpretation, contrast-enhanced coronary angiograms acquired with a multi- detector row CT scanner with four detector rows in 110 consecutive patients were analyzed. The problems identified were classified into four broad categories: (a) motion-related artifacts caused by cardiac, pulmonary, or other body motion; (b) beam-hardening effects caused by metallic implants, severe calcifications, or air bubbles in the pulmonary artery that obscured the underlying coronary vessel lumen; (c) structural artifacts produced by adjacent contrast material-filled structures and overlying vessels; and (d) artifacts that resulted from technical errors or limitations. The most frequently observed artifacts were those related to cardiac motion. The most effective methods for minimizing cardiac motion artifacts are (a) premedication with β-blockers to maintain optimal heart rate during scanning and (b) optimal selection of the reconstruction window.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2542596891&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2542596891&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1148/rg.243035502

DO - 10.1148/rg.243035502

M3 - Review article

VL - 24

SP - 787

EP - 800

JO - Radiographics

JF - Radiographics

SN - 0271-5333

IS - 3

ER -