Political polarization on twitter: Implications for the use of social media in digital governments

Sounman Hong, Sun Hyoung Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study investigates two competing opinions regarding the role of social media platforms in partisan polarization. The “echo chambers” view focuses on the highly fragmented, customized, and niche-oriented aspects of social media and suggests these venues foster greater political polarization of public opinion. An alternative, which we term the “crosscutting interactions” view, focuses on the openness of the Internet and social media, with different opinions just a click away. This view thus argues that polarization would not be especially problematic on these outlets. Exploiting the variation among members of the U.S. House of Representatives in measured positions of political ideology, this study estimates the association between politicians' ideological positions and the size of their Twitter readership. The evidence shows a strong polarization on Twitter readership, which supports the echo chambers view. Lastly, we discuss the implications of this evidence for governments' use of social media in collecting new ideas and opinions from the public.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)777-782
Number of pages6
JournalGovernment Information Quarterly
Volume33
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016 Oct 1

Fingerprint

twitter
social media
polarization
readership
chamber
political ideology
public opinion
evidence
politician
Internet
interaction

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Library and Information Sciences
  • Law

Cite this

@article{51a8c864db914f35b1831f39297e90d6,
title = "Political polarization on twitter: Implications for the use of social media in digital governments",
abstract = "This study investigates two competing opinions regarding the role of social media platforms in partisan polarization. The “echo chambers” view focuses on the highly fragmented, customized, and niche-oriented aspects of social media and suggests these venues foster greater political polarization of public opinion. An alternative, which we term the “crosscutting interactions” view, focuses on the openness of the Internet and social media, with different opinions just a click away. This view thus argues that polarization would not be especially problematic on these outlets. Exploiting the variation among members of the U.S. House of Representatives in measured positions of political ideology, this study estimates the association between politicians' ideological positions and the size of their Twitter readership. The evidence shows a strong polarization on Twitter readership, which supports the echo chambers view. Lastly, we discuss the implications of this evidence for governments' use of social media in collecting new ideas and opinions from the public.",
author = "Sounman Hong and Kim, {Sun Hyoung}",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.giq.2016.04.007",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "777--782",
journal = "Government Information Quarterly",
issn = "0740-624X",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",
number = "4",

}

Political polarization on twitter : Implications for the use of social media in digital governments. / Hong, Sounman; Kim, Sun Hyoung.

In: Government Information Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 4, 01.10.2016, p. 777-782.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Political polarization on twitter

T2 - Implications for the use of social media in digital governments

AU - Hong, Sounman

AU - Kim, Sun Hyoung

PY - 2016/10/1

Y1 - 2016/10/1

N2 - This study investigates two competing opinions regarding the role of social media platforms in partisan polarization. The “echo chambers” view focuses on the highly fragmented, customized, and niche-oriented aspects of social media and suggests these venues foster greater political polarization of public opinion. An alternative, which we term the “crosscutting interactions” view, focuses on the openness of the Internet and social media, with different opinions just a click away. This view thus argues that polarization would not be especially problematic on these outlets. Exploiting the variation among members of the U.S. House of Representatives in measured positions of political ideology, this study estimates the association between politicians' ideological positions and the size of their Twitter readership. The evidence shows a strong polarization on Twitter readership, which supports the echo chambers view. Lastly, we discuss the implications of this evidence for governments' use of social media in collecting new ideas and opinions from the public.

AB - This study investigates two competing opinions regarding the role of social media platforms in partisan polarization. The “echo chambers” view focuses on the highly fragmented, customized, and niche-oriented aspects of social media and suggests these venues foster greater political polarization of public opinion. An alternative, which we term the “crosscutting interactions” view, focuses on the openness of the Internet and social media, with different opinions just a click away. This view thus argues that polarization would not be especially problematic on these outlets. Exploiting the variation among members of the U.S. House of Representatives in measured positions of political ideology, this study estimates the association between politicians' ideological positions and the size of their Twitter readership. The evidence shows a strong polarization on Twitter readership, which supports the echo chambers view. Lastly, we discuss the implications of this evidence for governments' use of social media in collecting new ideas and opinions from the public.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84975166133&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84975166133&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.giq.2016.04.007

DO - 10.1016/j.giq.2016.04.007

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84975166133

VL - 33

SP - 777

EP - 782

JO - Government Information Quarterly

JF - Government Information Quarterly

SN - 0740-624X

IS - 4

ER -