TY - JOUR
T1 - Postoperative nasal symptoms associated with an endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach.
AU - Kim, Boo Young
AU - Son, Hye Lim
AU - Kang, Seok Gu
AU - Kim, Sung Won
AU - Hong, Yong Kil
AU - Jeun, Sin Soo
AU - Kim, Soo Whan
AU - Cho, Jin Hee
AU - Park, Yong Jin
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by Seoul St. Mary’s Clinical Medical Research Program year of 2010 through the Catholic University of Korea.
PY - 2013/3
Y1 - 2013/3
N2 - Recent studies have indicated the usefulness of endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach (EETSA). A few studies have reported on the postoperative nasal symptoms of patients who have undergone EETSA. Therefore, we adopted a rhinologic perspective to compare preoperative and postoperative nasal symptoms after performing a binostril, four-hand EETSA. Patients who were scheduled to undergo binostril, four-hand EETSA underwent preoperative nasal evaluation using the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE), Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-20 (SNOT-20), and a visual analogue scale (VAS) to assess several nasal symptoms. Repeat testing was performed 6 months postoperatively. Paired Student's t tests were used to compare preoperative and postoperative scores. A total of 142 patients who underwent a binostril, four-hand EETSA were included in this study. We found no statistically significant differences between preoperative and postoperative NOSE, total SNOT-20 scores, or scores on the VAS for nasal obstruction, sneezing, rhinorrhea, snoring, or facial pain. However, VAS of olfactory change increased significantly after EETSA (p < 0.05). The binostril, four-hand EETSA would be a useful method because it permits operative manipulability and a wide visual field for skull base lesions. However, rhinologists must consider postoperative nasal symptoms and perform a proper preoperative examination, especially with regard to the olfactory function, and inform patients scheduled for EETSA of potential postoperative changes.
AB - Recent studies have indicated the usefulness of endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal approach (EETSA). A few studies have reported on the postoperative nasal symptoms of patients who have undergone EETSA. Therefore, we adopted a rhinologic perspective to compare preoperative and postoperative nasal symptoms after performing a binostril, four-hand EETSA. Patients who were scheduled to undergo binostril, four-hand EETSA underwent preoperative nasal evaluation using the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE), Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-20 (SNOT-20), and a visual analogue scale (VAS) to assess several nasal symptoms. Repeat testing was performed 6 months postoperatively. Paired Student's t tests were used to compare preoperative and postoperative scores. A total of 142 patients who underwent a binostril, four-hand EETSA were included in this study. We found no statistically significant differences between preoperative and postoperative NOSE, total SNOT-20 scores, or scores on the VAS for nasal obstruction, sneezing, rhinorrhea, snoring, or facial pain. However, VAS of olfactory change increased significantly after EETSA (p < 0.05). The binostril, four-hand EETSA would be a useful method because it permits operative manipulability and a wide visual field for skull base lesions. However, rhinologists must consider postoperative nasal symptoms and perform a proper preoperative examination, especially with regard to the olfactory function, and inform patients scheduled for EETSA of potential postoperative changes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85027922766&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85027922766&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00405-012-2226-x
DO - 10.1007/s00405-012-2226-x
M3 - Article
C2 - 23081674
AN - SCOPUS:85027922766
SN - 1094-2025
VL - 270
SP - 1355
EP - 1359
JO - Review of Economic Dynamics
JF - Review of Economic Dynamics
IS - 4
ER -