Potential model misspecification bias: Formative indicators enhancing theory for accounting researchers

Waymond Rodgers, Andrés Guiral

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper describes why and when formative factors, in combination with reflective measures, can be used in accounting research to better represent complex theoretical constructs. We argue that the exclusive use of reflective factors constrains theory development and may lead to imprecise measurement. We provide a review of 66 published research papers from Accounting, Organization and Society, The Accounting Review, Contemporary Accounting Research, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Accounting, Auditing, & Accountability Journal, Behavioral Research in Accounting, International Journal of Accounting, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Management Accounting Research, Abacus, and Journal of Management Accounting Research using Structural Equation Models (SEM) from 1992 to 2008 to illustrate improvement of misspecification bias in leading accounting journals. Our findings suggest that most of the studies modeled constructs that did not include formative indicators.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)25-50
Number of pages26
JournalInternational Journal of Accounting
Volume46
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Mar 1

Fingerprint

Model misspecification
Accounting research
Management accounting
Factors
Auditing
Misspecification
Theory development
International accounting
Accounting theory
Public policy
Accounting policy
Structural equation model
Accountability
Policy management

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Accounting
  • Finance

Cite this

@article{5af2e2e1e3d04459a07093e0efa2b222,
title = "Potential model misspecification bias: Formative indicators enhancing theory for accounting researchers",
abstract = "This paper describes why and when formative factors, in combination with reflective measures, can be used in accounting research to better represent complex theoretical constructs. We argue that the exclusive use of reflective factors constrains theory development and may lead to imprecise measurement. We provide a review of 66 published research papers from Accounting, Organization and Society, The Accounting Review, Contemporary Accounting Research, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Accounting, Auditing, & Accountability Journal, Behavioral Research in Accounting, International Journal of Accounting, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Management Accounting Research, Abacus, and Journal of Management Accounting Research using Structural Equation Models (SEM) from 1992 to 2008 to illustrate improvement of misspecification bias in leading accounting journals. Our findings suggest that most of the studies modeled constructs that did not include formative indicators.",
author = "Waymond Rodgers and Andr{\'e}s Guiral",
year = "2011",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.intacc.2010.12.002",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "25--50",
journal = "International Journal of Accounting",
issn = "1094-4060",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",
number = "1",

}

Potential model misspecification bias : Formative indicators enhancing theory for accounting researchers. / Rodgers, Waymond; Guiral, Andrés.

In: International Journal of Accounting, Vol. 46, No. 1, 01.03.2011, p. 25-50.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Potential model misspecification bias

T2 - Formative indicators enhancing theory for accounting researchers

AU - Rodgers, Waymond

AU - Guiral, Andrés

PY - 2011/3/1

Y1 - 2011/3/1

N2 - This paper describes why and when formative factors, in combination with reflective measures, can be used in accounting research to better represent complex theoretical constructs. We argue that the exclusive use of reflective factors constrains theory development and may lead to imprecise measurement. We provide a review of 66 published research papers from Accounting, Organization and Society, The Accounting Review, Contemporary Accounting Research, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Accounting, Auditing, & Accountability Journal, Behavioral Research in Accounting, International Journal of Accounting, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Management Accounting Research, Abacus, and Journal of Management Accounting Research using Structural Equation Models (SEM) from 1992 to 2008 to illustrate improvement of misspecification bias in leading accounting journals. Our findings suggest that most of the studies modeled constructs that did not include formative indicators.

AB - This paper describes why and when formative factors, in combination with reflective measures, can be used in accounting research to better represent complex theoretical constructs. We argue that the exclusive use of reflective factors constrains theory development and may lead to imprecise measurement. We provide a review of 66 published research papers from Accounting, Organization and Society, The Accounting Review, Contemporary Accounting Research, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, Accounting, Auditing, & Accountability Journal, Behavioral Research in Accounting, International Journal of Accounting, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Management Accounting Research, Abacus, and Journal of Management Accounting Research using Structural Equation Models (SEM) from 1992 to 2008 to illustrate improvement of misspecification bias in leading accounting journals. Our findings suggest that most of the studies modeled constructs that did not include formative indicators.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79952447958&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79952447958&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.intacc.2010.12.002

DO - 10.1016/j.intacc.2010.12.002

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:79952447958

VL - 46

SP - 25

EP - 50

JO - International Journal of Accounting

JF - International Journal of Accounting

SN - 1094-4060

IS - 1

ER -