Potential pitfalls and therapeutic implications of pretherapeutic radiologic staging in glottic cancers

JaeYoul Lim, In Suh Park, Sun Won Park, Jae Won Kim, Young Mo Kim

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the radiologic findings with histological results of anatomically matched whole organ sections and to analyze the accuracy of pretherapeutic radiologic staging of glottic cancers. Methods: The histologic findings of surgical specimens of 30 patients who had undergone total or conservative partial laryngectomy for glottic cancers were matched and compared with the pretherapeutic radiologic findings using CT and MR imaging. The accuracy of pretherapeutic radiologic staging was assessed for specific subsites for staging of glottic cancers. Results: The overall accuracy of pretherapeutic staging with CT and MR imaging was 84.9%; 12.1% associated with false positive and 3% associated with false-negative assessments. For all subsites, the overall sensitivity was 88%, specificity 84%, positive predictive value 65%, and negative predictive value 95%. Subsites such as the anterior commissure, paraglottic space, and preepiglottic space showed lower specificity (42%, 65%, and 79% respectively) than the overall specificity. The radiologic evaluation for cartilage invasion showed the accuracy of 84.8% and yielded acceptable specificity (89%) and high negative predictive value (98%). Conclusion: Although pretherapeutic radiological examination is a very useful technique for the evaluation of tumor invasion into specific laryngeal subsites, the pretherapeutic radiologic staging can be challenging when distinguishing tumor from peritumoral inflammation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)869-875
Number of pages7
JournalActa Oto-Laryngologica
Volume131
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011 Aug 1

Fingerprint

Tongue Neoplasms
Laryngectomy
Cartilage
Neoplasms
Therapeutics
Inflammation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this

Lim, JaeYoul ; Park, In Suh ; Park, Sun Won ; Kim, Jae Won ; Kim, Young Mo. / Potential pitfalls and therapeutic implications of pretherapeutic radiologic staging in glottic cancers. In: Acta Oto-Laryngologica. 2011 ; Vol. 131, No. 8. pp. 869-875.
@article{89030d2c9e1f44eeb96bb256cc3b6f99,
title = "Potential pitfalls and therapeutic implications of pretherapeutic radiologic staging in glottic cancers",
abstract = "Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the radiologic findings with histological results of anatomically matched whole organ sections and to analyze the accuracy of pretherapeutic radiologic staging of glottic cancers. Methods: The histologic findings of surgical specimens of 30 patients who had undergone total or conservative partial laryngectomy for glottic cancers were matched and compared with the pretherapeutic radiologic findings using CT and MR imaging. The accuracy of pretherapeutic radiologic staging was assessed for specific subsites for staging of glottic cancers. Results: The overall accuracy of pretherapeutic staging with CT and MR imaging was 84.9{\%}; 12.1{\%} associated with false positive and 3{\%} associated with false-negative assessments. For all subsites, the overall sensitivity was 88{\%}, specificity 84{\%}, positive predictive value 65{\%}, and negative predictive value 95{\%}. Subsites such as the anterior commissure, paraglottic space, and preepiglottic space showed lower specificity (42{\%}, 65{\%}, and 79{\%} respectively) than the overall specificity. The radiologic evaluation for cartilage invasion showed the accuracy of 84.8{\%} and yielded acceptable specificity (89{\%}) and high negative predictive value (98{\%}). Conclusion: Although pretherapeutic radiological examination is a very useful technique for the evaluation of tumor invasion into specific laryngeal subsites, the pretherapeutic radiologic staging can be challenging when distinguishing tumor from peritumoral inflammation.",
author = "JaeYoul Lim and Park, {In Suh} and Park, {Sun Won} and Kim, {Jae Won} and Kim, {Young Mo}",
year = "2011",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3109/00016489.2011.562538",
language = "English",
volume = "131",
pages = "869--875",
journal = "Acta Oto-Laryngologica",
issn = "0001-6489",
publisher = "Informa Healthcare",
number = "8",

}

Potential pitfalls and therapeutic implications of pretherapeutic radiologic staging in glottic cancers. / Lim, JaeYoul; Park, In Suh; Park, Sun Won; Kim, Jae Won; Kim, Young Mo.

In: Acta Oto-Laryngologica, Vol. 131, No. 8, 01.08.2011, p. 869-875.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Potential pitfalls and therapeutic implications of pretherapeutic radiologic staging in glottic cancers

AU - Lim, JaeYoul

AU - Park, In Suh

AU - Park, Sun Won

AU - Kim, Jae Won

AU - Kim, Young Mo

PY - 2011/8/1

Y1 - 2011/8/1

N2 - Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the radiologic findings with histological results of anatomically matched whole organ sections and to analyze the accuracy of pretherapeutic radiologic staging of glottic cancers. Methods: The histologic findings of surgical specimens of 30 patients who had undergone total or conservative partial laryngectomy for glottic cancers were matched and compared with the pretherapeutic radiologic findings using CT and MR imaging. The accuracy of pretherapeutic radiologic staging was assessed for specific subsites for staging of glottic cancers. Results: The overall accuracy of pretherapeutic staging with CT and MR imaging was 84.9%; 12.1% associated with false positive and 3% associated with false-negative assessments. For all subsites, the overall sensitivity was 88%, specificity 84%, positive predictive value 65%, and negative predictive value 95%. Subsites such as the anterior commissure, paraglottic space, and preepiglottic space showed lower specificity (42%, 65%, and 79% respectively) than the overall specificity. The radiologic evaluation for cartilage invasion showed the accuracy of 84.8% and yielded acceptable specificity (89%) and high negative predictive value (98%). Conclusion: Although pretherapeutic radiological examination is a very useful technique for the evaluation of tumor invasion into specific laryngeal subsites, the pretherapeutic radiologic staging can be challenging when distinguishing tumor from peritumoral inflammation.

AB - Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the radiologic findings with histological results of anatomically matched whole organ sections and to analyze the accuracy of pretherapeutic radiologic staging of glottic cancers. Methods: The histologic findings of surgical specimens of 30 patients who had undergone total or conservative partial laryngectomy for glottic cancers were matched and compared with the pretherapeutic radiologic findings using CT and MR imaging. The accuracy of pretherapeutic radiologic staging was assessed for specific subsites for staging of glottic cancers. Results: The overall accuracy of pretherapeutic staging with CT and MR imaging was 84.9%; 12.1% associated with false positive and 3% associated with false-negative assessments. For all subsites, the overall sensitivity was 88%, specificity 84%, positive predictive value 65%, and negative predictive value 95%. Subsites such as the anterior commissure, paraglottic space, and preepiglottic space showed lower specificity (42%, 65%, and 79% respectively) than the overall specificity. The radiologic evaluation for cartilage invasion showed the accuracy of 84.8% and yielded acceptable specificity (89%) and high negative predictive value (98%). Conclusion: Although pretherapeutic radiological examination is a very useful technique for the evaluation of tumor invasion into specific laryngeal subsites, the pretherapeutic radiologic staging can be challenging when distinguishing tumor from peritumoral inflammation.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960456045&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960456045&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3109/00016489.2011.562538

DO - 10.3109/00016489.2011.562538

M3 - Article

VL - 131

SP - 869

EP - 875

JO - Acta Oto-Laryngologica

JF - Acta Oto-Laryngologica

SN - 0001-6489

IS - 8

ER -