Power, Alliance, and Major Wars, 1816-1975

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

49 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

For years, students of international politics have attempted to explain seemingly contradictory perspectives about the relationship between power distribution and the onset of war, and between alliance formation and the incidence of war. Power transition theorists claim that war is most likely when power is equally distributed among nations and that alliances have little or no impact on the likelihood of major wars, whereas balance-of-power theorists suggest that war is less likely when power is equally distributed and that alliances play a critical role in the incidence of war. In this research, several propositions suggested by the power transition theory are tested for major war cases from 1816 to 1975. The main findings show that alliances play a significant role in the incidence of major wars and that the probability of war increases when the two alliance coalitions, not the two nations in a dyad, have approximately equal power. These findings confirm neither the balance-of-power perspective nor the view of the power transition model. In addition, the power transition and the rate of growth hypotheses claimed by the power transition theory are not empirically supported.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)255-273
Number of pages19
JournalJournal of Conflict Resolution
Volume33
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1989 Jan 1

Fingerprint

incidence
balance of power
Alliances
International Politics
dyad
coalition
student
Dyads
International politics
Power distribution
Alliance formation

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

@article{2758d521d7e348dc886a98f53086cc4e,
title = "Power, Alliance, and Major Wars, 1816-1975",
abstract = "For years, students of international politics have attempted to explain seemingly contradictory perspectives about the relationship between power distribution and the onset of war, and between alliance formation and the incidence of war. Power transition theorists claim that war is most likely when power is equally distributed among nations and that alliances have little or no impact on the likelihood of major wars, whereas balance-of-power theorists suggest that war is less likely when power is equally distributed and that alliances play a critical role in the incidence of war. In this research, several propositions suggested by the power transition theory are tested for major war cases from 1816 to 1975. The main findings show that alliances play a significant role in the incidence of major wars and that the probability of war increases when the two alliance coalitions, not the two nations in a dyad, have approximately equal power. These findings confirm neither the balance-of-power perspective nor the view of the power transition model. In addition, the power transition and the rate of growth hypotheses claimed by the power transition theory are not empirically supported.",
author = "Kim, {Woo Sang}",
year = "1989",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0022002789033002004",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "255--273",
journal = "Journal of Conflict Resolution",
issn = "0022-0027",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "2",

}

Power, Alliance, and Major Wars, 1816-1975. / Kim, Woo Sang.

In: Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 33, No. 2, 01.01.1989, p. 255-273.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Power, Alliance, and Major Wars, 1816-1975

AU - Kim, Woo Sang

PY - 1989/1/1

Y1 - 1989/1/1

N2 - For years, students of international politics have attempted to explain seemingly contradictory perspectives about the relationship between power distribution and the onset of war, and between alliance formation and the incidence of war. Power transition theorists claim that war is most likely when power is equally distributed among nations and that alliances have little or no impact on the likelihood of major wars, whereas balance-of-power theorists suggest that war is less likely when power is equally distributed and that alliances play a critical role in the incidence of war. In this research, several propositions suggested by the power transition theory are tested for major war cases from 1816 to 1975. The main findings show that alliances play a significant role in the incidence of major wars and that the probability of war increases when the two alliance coalitions, not the two nations in a dyad, have approximately equal power. These findings confirm neither the balance-of-power perspective nor the view of the power transition model. In addition, the power transition and the rate of growth hypotheses claimed by the power transition theory are not empirically supported.

AB - For years, students of international politics have attempted to explain seemingly contradictory perspectives about the relationship between power distribution and the onset of war, and between alliance formation and the incidence of war. Power transition theorists claim that war is most likely when power is equally distributed among nations and that alliances have little or no impact on the likelihood of major wars, whereas balance-of-power theorists suggest that war is less likely when power is equally distributed and that alliances play a critical role in the incidence of war. In this research, several propositions suggested by the power transition theory are tested for major war cases from 1816 to 1975. The main findings show that alliances play a significant role in the incidence of major wars and that the probability of war increases when the two alliance coalitions, not the two nations in a dyad, have approximately equal power. These findings confirm neither the balance-of-power perspective nor the view of the power transition model. In addition, the power transition and the rate of growth hypotheses claimed by the power transition theory are not empirically supported.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84970269581&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84970269581&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0022002789033002004

DO - 10.1177/0022002789033002004

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 255

EP - 273

JO - Journal of Conflict Resolution

JF - Journal of Conflict Resolution

SN - 0022-0027

IS - 2

ER -