Power parity, alliance, dissatisfaction, and wars in East Asia, 1860-1993

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Original power transition theory is extended by relaxing the restrictive assumption of the method of augmenting national power. The occurrence of war in East Asia from 1860 to 1993 is examined to see if the revised power transition argument holds for the conflicts in East Asia. Results show that conflicts in East Asia occur under the same general conditions that lead to war in the international system and that war is most likely when the dissatisfied challenger approximates the dominant power. The evidence also suggests that the role of alliances is crucial for mitigating or militating the risk of war, contrary to the standard power transition formulation. Because alliances play a central role in the risk of wars, the dangers of such a conflict in East Asia (or elsewhere) can be managed through skillful strategies of alignment and de-alignment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)654-671
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Conflict Resolution
Volume46
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2002 Oct 1

Fingerprint

general conditions
international system
East Asia
Dissatisfaction
Parity
Alliances
evidence
Alignment
Challenger

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Cite this

@article{3f1e39826a464fb783cbc78ddcd7757d,
title = "Power parity, alliance, dissatisfaction, and wars in East Asia, 1860-1993",
abstract = "Original power transition theory is extended by relaxing the restrictive assumption of the method of augmenting national power. The occurrence of war in East Asia from 1860 to 1993 is examined to see if the revised power transition argument holds for the conflicts in East Asia. Results show that conflicts in East Asia occur under the same general conditions that lead to war in the international system and that war is most likely when the dissatisfied challenger approximates the dominant power. The evidence also suggests that the role of alliances is crucial for mitigating or militating the risk of war, contrary to the standard power transition formulation. Because alliances play a central role in the risk of wars, the dangers of such a conflict in East Asia (or elsewhere) can be managed through skillful strategies of alignment and de-alignment.",
author = "Kim, {Woo Sang}",
year = "2002",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/002200202236168",
language = "English",
volume = "46",
pages = "654--671",
journal = "Journal of Conflict Resolution",
issn = "0022-0027",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "5",

}

Power parity, alliance, dissatisfaction, and wars in East Asia, 1860-1993. / Kim, Woo Sang.

In: Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 46, No. 5, 01.10.2002, p. 654-671.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Power parity, alliance, dissatisfaction, and wars in East Asia, 1860-1993

AU - Kim, Woo Sang

PY - 2002/10/1

Y1 - 2002/10/1

N2 - Original power transition theory is extended by relaxing the restrictive assumption of the method of augmenting national power. The occurrence of war in East Asia from 1860 to 1993 is examined to see if the revised power transition argument holds for the conflicts in East Asia. Results show that conflicts in East Asia occur under the same general conditions that lead to war in the international system and that war is most likely when the dissatisfied challenger approximates the dominant power. The evidence also suggests that the role of alliances is crucial for mitigating or militating the risk of war, contrary to the standard power transition formulation. Because alliances play a central role in the risk of wars, the dangers of such a conflict in East Asia (or elsewhere) can be managed through skillful strategies of alignment and de-alignment.

AB - Original power transition theory is extended by relaxing the restrictive assumption of the method of augmenting national power. The occurrence of war in East Asia from 1860 to 1993 is examined to see if the revised power transition argument holds for the conflicts in East Asia. Results show that conflicts in East Asia occur under the same general conditions that lead to war in the international system and that war is most likely when the dissatisfied challenger approximates the dominant power. The evidence also suggests that the role of alliances is crucial for mitigating or militating the risk of war, contrary to the standard power transition formulation. Because alliances play a central role in the risk of wars, the dangers of such a conflict in East Asia (or elsewhere) can be managed through skillful strategies of alignment and de-alignment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036388482&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036388482&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/002200202236168

DO - 10.1177/002200202236168

M3 - Article

VL - 46

SP - 654

EP - 671

JO - Journal of Conflict Resolution

JF - Journal of Conflict Resolution

SN - 0022-0027

IS - 5

ER -