Pragmatic low-power interoperability: ContikiMAC vs TinyOS LPL

Jeong Gil Ko, Nicolas Tsiftes, Adam Dunkels, Andreas Terzis

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Standardization has driven interoperability at multiple layers of the stack, such as the routing and application layers, standardization of radio duty cycling mechanisms have not yet reached the same maturity. In this work, we pitch the two de facto standard flavors of sender-initiated radio duty cycling mechanisms against each other: ContikiMAC and TinyOS LPL. Our aim is to explore pragmatic interoperability mechanisms at the radio duty cycling layer. This will lead to better understanding of interoperability problems moving forward, as radio duty cycling mechanisms get standardized. Our results show that the two flavors can be configured to operate together but that parameter configuration may severely hurt performance.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication2012 9th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, SECON 2012
Pages94-96
Number of pages3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Nov 1
Event2012 9th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, SECON 2012 - Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Duration: 2012 Jun 182012 Jun 21

Publication series

NameAnnual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks workshops
Volume1
ISSN (Print)2155-5486
ISSN (Electronic)2155-5494

Other

Other2012 9th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, SECON 2012
CountryKorea, Republic of
CitySeoul
Period12/6/1812/6/21

Fingerprint

Interoperability
Flavors
Standardization

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Hardware and Architecture
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering

Cite this

Ko, J. G., Tsiftes, N., Dunkels, A., & Terzis, A. (2012). Pragmatic low-power interoperability: ContikiMAC vs TinyOS LPL. In 2012 9th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, SECON 2012 (pp. 94-96). [6276358] (Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks workshops; Vol. 1). https://doi.org/10.1109/SECON.2012.6276358
Ko, Jeong Gil ; Tsiftes, Nicolas ; Dunkels, Adam ; Terzis, Andreas. / Pragmatic low-power interoperability : ContikiMAC vs TinyOS LPL. 2012 9th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, SECON 2012. 2012. pp. 94-96 (Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks workshops).
@inproceedings{84282776f91b478195d9729941292f9b,
title = "Pragmatic low-power interoperability: ContikiMAC vs TinyOS LPL",
abstract = "Standardization has driven interoperability at multiple layers of the stack, such as the routing and application layers, standardization of radio duty cycling mechanisms have not yet reached the same maturity. In this work, we pitch the two de facto standard flavors of sender-initiated radio duty cycling mechanisms against each other: ContikiMAC and TinyOS LPL. Our aim is to explore pragmatic interoperability mechanisms at the radio duty cycling layer. This will lead to better understanding of interoperability problems moving forward, as radio duty cycling mechanisms get standardized. Our results show that the two flavors can be configured to operate together but that parameter configuration may severely hurt performance.",
author = "Ko, {Jeong Gil} and Nicolas Tsiftes and Adam Dunkels and Andreas Terzis",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1109/SECON.2012.6276358",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781467319058",
series = "Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks workshops",
pages = "94--96",
booktitle = "2012 9th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, SECON 2012",

}

Ko, JG, Tsiftes, N, Dunkels, A & Terzis, A 2012, Pragmatic low-power interoperability: ContikiMAC vs TinyOS LPL. in 2012 9th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, SECON 2012., 6276358, Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks workshops, vol. 1, pp. 94-96, 2012 9th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, SECON 2012, Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 12/6/18. https://doi.org/10.1109/SECON.2012.6276358

Pragmatic low-power interoperability : ContikiMAC vs TinyOS LPL. / Ko, Jeong Gil; Tsiftes, Nicolas; Dunkels, Adam; Terzis, Andreas.

2012 9th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, SECON 2012. 2012. p. 94-96 6276358 (Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks workshops; Vol. 1).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

TY - GEN

T1 - Pragmatic low-power interoperability

T2 - ContikiMAC vs TinyOS LPL

AU - Ko, Jeong Gil

AU - Tsiftes, Nicolas

AU - Dunkels, Adam

AU - Terzis, Andreas

PY - 2012/11/1

Y1 - 2012/11/1

N2 - Standardization has driven interoperability at multiple layers of the stack, such as the routing and application layers, standardization of radio duty cycling mechanisms have not yet reached the same maturity. In this work, we pitch the two de facto standard flavors of sender-initiated radio duty cycling mechanisms against each other: ContikiMAC and TinyOS LPL. Our aim is to explore pragmatic interoperability mechanisms at the radio duty cycling layer. This will lead to better understanding of interoperability problems moving forward, as radio duty cycling mechanisms get standardized. Our results show that the two flavors can be configured to operate together but that parameter configuration may severely hurt performance.

AB - Standardization has driven interoperability at multiple layers of the stack, such as the routing and application layers, standardization of radio duty cycling mechanisms have not yet reached the same maturity. In this work, we pitch the two de facto standard flavors of sender-initiated radio duty cycling mechanisms against each other: ContikiMAC and TinyOS LPL. Our aim is to explore pragmatic interoperability mechanisms at the radio duty cycling layer. This will lead to better understanding of interoperability problems moving forward, as radio duty cycling mechanisms get standardized. Our results show that the two flavors can be configured to operate together but that parameter configuration may severely hurt performance.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867964309&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867964309&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1109/SECON.2012.6276358

DO - 10.1109/SECON.2012.6276358

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84867964309

SN - 9781467319058

T3 - Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks workshops

SP - 94

EP - 96

BT - 2012 9th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, SECON 2012

ER -

Ko JG, Tsiftes N, Dunkels A, Terzis A. Pragmatic low-power interoperability: ContikiMAC vs TinyOS LPL. In 2012 9th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks, SECON 2012. 2012. p. 94-96. 6276358. (Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks workshops). https://doi.org/10.1109/SECON.2012.6276358