Preoperative imaging evaluation of head and neck cancer: Comparison of 2D spin-echo and 3D THRIVE MRI techniques with resected tumours

S. S. Ahn, J. Kim, C. An, H. S. Choi, S. K. Lee, Y. W. Koh, S. H. Kim, E. C. Choi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the usefulness of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted high-resolution isotropic volume examination (THRIVE) for the preoperative assessment of head and neck cancer, by comparison with spin-echo (SE) T1-weighted sequences and the pathology specimen. Materials and methods: Thirty-seven consecutive patients who were diagnosed with oral cavity, oropharyngeal, and hypopharyngeal cancer and received surgical excision with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using both SE and 3D THRIVE sequences after gadolinium injection were studied. Tumour conspicuity, motion- and flow-related artefacts were evaluated, and the tumour size was measured based on both sequences, which were correlated with the surgical specimen. The population correlation coefficient (rg2) and Bland-Altman plots were used to assess measurement agreement. Results: There was no statistical difference between SE and THRIVE in terms of tumour conspicuity and motion-related artefacts, however, flow-related artefacts significantly decreased with THRIVE. The measurement agreement of tumour size estimated on both SE and THRIVE was good (rg2=0.87 for SE and 0.93 for THRIVE), and the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion: The 3D THRIVE sequence provided satisfactory image quality for the accurate measurement of tumour size with fewer artefacts and could be an acceptable alternative for SE T1-weighted images for preoperative staging in patients with head and neck cancer.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)e98-e104
JournalClinical Radiology
Volume67
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2012 Dec 1

Fingerprint

Head and Neck Neoplasms
Artifacts
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Neoplasms
Hypopharyngeal Neoplasms
Oropharyngeal Neoplasms
Mouth Neoplasms
Gadolinium
Mouth
Pathology
Injections
Population

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Cite this

Ahn, S. S. ; Kim, J. ; An, C. ; Choi, H. S. ; Lee, S. K. ; Koh, Y. W. ; Kim, S. H. ; Choi, E. C. / Preoperative imaging evaluation of head and neck cancer : Comparison of 2D spin-echo and 3D THRIVE MRI techniques with resected tumours. In: Clinical Radiology. 2012 ; Vol. 67, No. 12. pp. e98-e104.
@article{5ec36c741343430288f1224506fe9634,
title = "Preoperative imaging evaluation of head and neck cancer: Comparison of 2D spin-echo and 3D THRIVE MRI techniques with resected tumours",
abstract = "Aim: To evaluate the usefulness of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted high-resolution isotropic volume examination (THRIVE) for the preoperative assessment of head and neck cancer, by comparison with spin-echo (SE) T1-weighted sequences and the pathology specimen. Materials and methods: Thirty-seven consecutive patients who were diagnosed with oral cavity, oropharyngeal, and hypopharyngeal cancer and received surgical excision with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using both SE and 3D THRIVE sequences after gadolinium injection were studied. Tumour conspicuity, motion- and flow-related artefacts were evaluated, and the tumour size was measured based on both sequences, which were correlated with the surgical specimen. The population correlation coefficient (rg2) and Bland-Altman plots were used to assess measurement agreement. Results: There was no statistical difference between SE and THRIVE in terms of tumour conspicuity and motion-related artefacts, however, flow-related artefacts significantly decreased with THRIVE. The measurement agreement of tumour size estimated on both SE and THRIVE was good (rg2=0.87 for SE and 0.93 for THRIVE), and the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion: The 3D THRIVE sequence provided satisfactory image quality for the accurate measurement of tumour size with fewer artefacts and could be an acceptable alternative for SE T1-weighted images for preoperative staging in patients with head and neck cancer.",
author = "Ahn, {S. S.} and J. Kim and C. An and Choi, {H. S.} and Lee, {S. K.} and Koh, {Y. W.} and Kim, {S. H.} and Choi, {E. C.}",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.crad.2012.08.017",
language = "English",
volume = "67",
pages = "e98--e104",
journal = "Clinical Radiology",
issn = "0009-9260",
publisher = "W.B. Saunders Ltd",
number = "12",

}

Preoperative imaging evaluation of head and neck cancer : Comparison of 2D spin-echo and 3D THRIVE MRI techniques with resected tumours. / Ahn, S. S.; Kim, J.; An, C.; Choi, H. S.; Lee, S. K.; Koh, Y. W.; Kim, S. H.; Choi, E. C.

In: Clinical Radiology, Vol. 67, No. 12, 01.12.2012, p. e98-e104.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Preoperative imaging evaluation of head and neck cancer

T2 - Comparison of 2D spin-echo and 3D THRIVE MRI techniques with resected tumours

AU - Ahn, S. S.

AU - Kim, J.

AU - An, C.

AU - Choi, H. S.

AU - Lee, S. K.

AU - Koh, Y. W.

AU - Kim, S. H.

AU - Choi, E. C.

PY - 2012/12/1

Y1 - 2012/12/1

N2 - Aim: To evaluate the usefulness of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted high-resolution isotropic volume examination (THRIVE) for the preoperative assessment of head and neck cancer, by comparison with spin-echo (SE) T1-weighted sequences and the pathology specimen. Materials and methods: Thirty-seven consecutive patients who were diagnosed with oral cavity, oropharyngeal, and hypopharyngeal cancer and received surgical excision with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using both SE and 3D THRIVE sequences after gadolinium injection were studied. Tumour conspicuity, motion- and flow-related artefacts were evaluated, and the tumour size was measured based on both sequences, which were correlated with the surgical specimen. The population correlation coefficient (rg2) and Bland-Altman plots were used to assess measurement agreement. Results: There was no statistical difference between SE and THRIVE in terms of tumour conspicuity and motion-related artefacts, however, flow-related artefacts significantly decreased with THRIVE. The measurement agreement of tumour size estimated on both SE and THRIVE was good (rg2=0.87 for SE and 0.93 for THRIVE), and the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion: The 3D THRIVE sequence provided satisfactory image quality for the accurate measurement of tumour size with fewer artefacts and could be an acceptable alternative for SE T1-weighted images for preoperative staging in patients with head and neck cancer.

AB - Aim: To evaluate the usefulness of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional (3D) T1-weighted high-resolution isotropic volume examination (THRIVE) for the preoperative assessment of head and neck cancer, by comparison with spin-echo (SE) T1-weighted sequences and the pathology specimen. Materials and methods: Thirty-seven consecutive patients who were diagnosed with oral cavity, oropharyngeal, and hypopharyngeal cancer and received surgical excision with preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using both SE and 3D THRIVE sequences after gadolinium injection were studied. Tumour conspicuity, motion- and flow-related artefacts were evaluated, and the tumour size was measured based on both sequences, which were correlated with the surgical specimen. The population correlation coefficient (rg2) and Bland-Altman plots were used to assess measurement agreement. Results: There was no statistical difference between SE and THRIVE in terms of tumour conspicuity and motion-related artefacts, however, flow-related artefacts significantly decreased with THRIVE. The measurement agreement of tumour size estimated on both SE and THRIVE was good (rg2=0.87 for SE and 0.93 for THRIVE), and the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion: The 3D THRIVE sequence provided satisfactory image quality for the accurate measurement of tumour size with fewer artefacts and could be an acceptable alternative for SE T1-weighted images for preoperative staging in patients with head and neck cancer.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84869091108&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84869091108&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.crad.2012.08.017

DO - 10.1016/j.crad.2012.08.017

M3 - Article

C2 - 23021795

AN - SCOPUS:84869091108

VL - 67

SP - e98-e104

JO - Clinical Radiology

JF - Clinical Radiology

SN - 0009-9260

IS - 12

ER -