TY - JOUR
T1 - Procedural Characteristics of Intravascular Ultrasound–Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Their Clinical Implications
AU - Lee, Seung Yul
AU - Zhang, Jun Jie
AU - Mintz, Gary S.
AU - Hong, Sung Jin
AU - Ahn, Chul Min
AU - Kim, Jung Sun
AU - Kim, Byeong Keuk
AU - Ko, Young Guk
AU - Choi, Donghoon
AU - Jang, Yangsoo
AU - Kan, Jing
AU - Pan, Tao
AU - Gao, Xiaofei
AU - Ge, Zhen
AU - Chen, Shao Liang
AU - Hong, Myeong Ki
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the Cardiovascular Research Center (Seoul, Korea), and Wonkwang University (Iksan, Korea) in 2021.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - BACKGROUND: Despite the clinical benefits to intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), most patients with coronary artery disease undergo angiography-guided PCI alone in the real-world setting. We sought to investigate the procedural characteristics of IVUS-guided PCI and their clinical outcomes, as compared with angiography-guided PCI. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a cohort study using patient-level data from the IVUS-XPL (Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance on the Outcomes of Xience Prime Stents in Long Lesions) and ULTIMATE (Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Drug Eluting Stents Implantation in All-Comers Coronary Lesions) clinical trials. A total of 2848 patients with 3872 native coronary lesions were included and procedural characteristics assessed by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) were compared between IVUS and angiography guidance. Stent-to-reference vessel diameter ratio (ie, QCA stent sizing) was greater (1.11±0.16 versus 1.07±0.14, P<0.001) and high-pressure postdilation was more frequently performed (83.7% versus 75.4%, P<0.001) with IVUS guidance, whereas residual stent edge dissections were more frequent in lesions treated with IVUS guidance (4.6% versus 0.7%, P<0.001). Given the dissection risk, optimal QCA stent sizing for IVUS guidance was a stent-to-QCA reference vessel diameter ratio ≥1.1 to <1.3. Among 1424 patients (1969 lesions) treated with angiography guidance, QCA stent sizing <1.0 was observed in 651 (33.1%) lesions, while QCA stent sizing ≥1.1 to <1.3 was observed in only 526 (26.7%) lesions. Under angiography guidance, patients with both QCA stent sizing ≥1.1 to <1.3 and high-pressure postdilation (235 of 1424, 16.5%) had a lower risk of 3-year target lesion failure compared with others (hazard ratio, 0.532; 95% CI, 0.293–0.966 [P=0.038]). CONCLUSIONS: IVUS-guided PCI resulted in larger QCA-assessed stent sizing and more frequent postdilation with high-pressure inflations. These procedures may further improve long-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing PCI without IVUS. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01308281 (IVUS-XPL); NCT02215915 (ULTIMATE).
AB - BACKGROUND: Despite the clinical benefits to intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), most patients with coronary artery disease undergo angiography-guided PCI alone in the real-world setting. We sought to investigate the procedural characteristics of IVUS-guided PCI and their clinical outcomes, as compared with angiography-guided PCI. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a cohort study using patient-level data from the IVUS-XPL (Impact of Intravascular Ultrasound Guidance on the Outcomes of Xience Prime Stents in Long Lesions) and ULTIMATE (Intravascular Ultrasound Guided Drug Eluting Stents Implantation in All-Comers Coronary Lesions) clinical trials. A total of 2848 patients with 3872 native coronary lesions were included and procedural characteristics assessed by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) were compared between IVUS and angiography guidance. Stent-to-reference vessel diameter ratio (ie, QCA stent sizing) was greater (1.11±0.16 versus 1.07±0.14, P<0.001) and high-pressure postdilation was more frequently performed (83.7% versus 75.4%, P<0.001) with IVUS guidance, whereas residual stent edge dissections were more frequent in lesions treated with IVUS guidance (4.6% versus 0.7%, P<0.001). Given the dissection risk, optimal QCA stent sizing for IVUS guidance was a stent-to-QCA reference vessel diameter ratio ≥1.1 to <1.3. Among 1424 patients (1969 lesions) treated with angiography guidance, QCA stent sizing <1.0 was observed in 651 (33.1%) lesions, while QCA stent sizing ≥1.1 to <1.3 was observed in only 526 (26.7%) lesions. Under angiography guidance, patients with both QCA stent sizing ≥1.1 to <1.3 and high-pressure postdilation (235 of 1424, 16.5%) had a lower risk of 3-year target lesion failure compared with others (hazard ratio, 0.532; 95% CI, 0.293–0.966 [P=0.038]). CONCLUSIONS: IVUS-guided PCI resulted in larger QCA-assessed stent sizing and more frequent postdilation with high-pressure inflations. These procedures may further improve long-term clinical outcomes in patients undergoing PCI without IVUS. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01308281 (IVUS-XPL); NCT02215915 (ULTIMATE).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85134609468&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85134609468&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1161/JAHA.122.025258
DO - 10.1161/JAHA.122.025258
M3 - Article
C2 - 35861828
AN - SCOPUS:85134609468
SN - 2047-9980
VL - 11
JO - Journal of the American Heart Association
JF - Journal of the American Heart Association
IS - 14
M1 - e025258
ER -