Proposal of an appropriate decalcification method of bone marrow biopsy specimens in the era of expanding genetic molecular study

Sung Eun Choi, Soon Won Hong, Sun Och Yoon

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

16 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The conventional method for decalcification of bone specimens uses hydrochloric acid (HCl) and is notorious for damaging cellular RNA, DNA, and proteins, thus complicating molecular and immunohistochemical analyses. A method that can effectively decalcify while preserving genetic material is necessary. Methods: Pairs of bilateral bone marrow biopsies sampled from 53 patients were decalcified according to protocols of two comparison groups: EDTA versus HCl and RDO GOLD (RDO) versus HCl. Pairs of right and left bone marrow biopsy samples harvested from 28 cases were allocated into the EDTA versus HCl comparison group, and 25 cases to the RDO versus HCl comparison group. The decalcification protocols were compared with regards to histomorphology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular analysis. For molecular analysis, we randomly selected 5 cases from the EDTA versus HCl and RDO versus HCl groups. Results: The decalcification time for appropriate histomorphologic analysis was the longest in the EDTA method and the shortest in the RDO method. EDTA was superior to RDO or HCl in DNA yield and integrity, assessed via DNA extraction, polymerase chain reaction, and silver in situ hybridization using DNA probes. The EDTA method maintained intact nuclear protein staining on immunohistochemistry, while the HCl method produced poor quality images. Staining after the RDO method had equivocal results. RNA in situ hybridization using kappa and lambda RNA probes measured RNA integrity; the EDTA and RDO method had the best quality, followed by HCl. Conclusions: The EDTA protocol would be the best in preserving genetic material. RDO may be an acceptable alternative when rapid decalcification is necessary.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)236-242
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Pathology and Translational Medicine
Volume49
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Hydrochloric Acid
Molecular Biology
Edetic Acid
Bone Marrow
Biopsy
RNA
In Situ Hybridization
Immunohistochemistry
Staining and Labeling
RNA Probes
DNA
DNA Probes
DNA-Directed DNA Polymerase
Nuclear Proteins
Silver
Genes
Bone and Bones
Polymerase Chain Reaction

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Histology

Cite this

@article{e45e88fbcd0d4b048cfc5c19d3f2af32,
title = "Proposal of an appropriate decalcification method of bone marrow biopsy specimens in the era of expanding genetic molecular study",
abstract = "Background: The conventional method for decalcification of bone specimens uses hydrochloric acid (HCl) and is notorious for damaging cellular RNA, DNA, and proteins, thus complicating molecular and immunohistochemical analyses. A method that can effectively decalcify while preserving genetic material is necessary. Methods: Pairs of bilateral bone marrow biopsies sampled from 53 patients were decalcified according to protocols of two comparison groups: EDTA versus HCl and RDO GOLD (RDO) versus HCl. Pairs of right and left bone marrow biopsy samples harvested from 28 cases were allocated into the EDTA versus HCl comparison group, and 25 cases to the RDO versus HCl comparison group. The decalcification protocols were compared with regards to histomorphology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular analysis. For molecular analysis, we randomly selected 5 cases from the EDTA versus HCl and RDO versus HCl groups. Results: The decalcification time for appropriate histomorphologic analysis was the longest in the EDTA method and the shortest in the RDO method. EDTA was superior to RDO or HCl in DNA yield and integrity, assessed via DNA extraction, polymerase chain reaction, and silver in situ hybridization using DNA probes. The EDTA method maintained intact nuclear protein staining on immunohistochemistry, while the HCl method produced poor quality images. Staining after the RDO method had equivocal results. RNA in situ hybridization using kappa and lambda RNA probes measured RNA integrity; the EDTA and RDO method had the best quality, followed by HCl. Conclusions: The EDTA protocol would be the best in preserving genetic material. RDO may be an acceptable alternative when rapid decalcification is necessary.",
author = "Choi, {Sung Eun} and Hong, {Soon Won} and Yoon, {Sun Och}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4132/jptm.2015.03.16",
language = "English",
volume = "49",
pages = "236--242",
journal = "Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine",
issn = "2383-7837",
publisher = "Korean Society of Pathologists",
number = "3",

}

Proposal of an appropriate decalcification method of bone marrow biopsy specimens in the era of expanding genetic molecular study. / Choi, Sung Eun; Hong, Soon Won; Yoon, Sun Och.

In: Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine, Vol. 49, No. 3, 01.01.2015, p. 236-242.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Proposal of an appropriate decalcification method of bone marrow biopsy specimens in the era of expanding genetic molecular study

AU - Choi, Sung Eun

AU - Hong, Soon Won

AU - Yoon, Sun Och

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - Background: The conventional method for decalcification of bone specimens uses hydrochloric acid (HCl) and is notorious for damaging cellular RNA, DNA, and proteins, thus complicating molecular and immunohistochemical analyses. A method that can effectively decalcify while preserving genetic material is necessary. Methods: Pairs of bilateral bone marrow biopsies sampled from 53 patients were decalcified according to protocols of two comparison groups: EDTA versus HCl and RDO GOLD (RDO) versus HCl. Pairs of right and left bone marrow biopsy samples harvested from 28 cases were allocated into the EDTA versus HCl comparison group, and 25 cases to the RDO versus HCl comparison group. The decalcification protocols were compared with regards to histomorphology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular analysis. For molecular analysis, we randomly selected 5 cases from the EDTA versus HCl and RDO versus HCl groups. Results: The decalcification time for appropriate histomorphologic analysis was the longest in the EDTA method and the shortest in the RDO method. EDTA was superior to RDO or HCl in DNA yield and integrity, assessed via DNA extraction, polymerase chain reaction, and silver in situ hybridization using DNA probes. The EDTA method maintained intact nuclear protein staining on immunohistochemistry, while the HCl method produced poor quality images. Staining after the RDO method had equivocal results. RNA in situ hybridization using kappa and lambda RNA probes measured RNA integrity; the EDTA and RDO method had the best quality, followed by HCl. Conclusions: The EDTA protocol would be the best in preserving genetic material. RDO may be an acceptable alternative when rapid decalcification is necessary.

AB - Background: The conventional method for decalcification of bone specimens uses hydrochloric acid (HCl) and is notorious for damaging cellular RNA, DNA, and proteins, thus complicating molecular and immunohistochemical analyses. A method that can effectively decalcify while preserving genetic material is necessary. Methods: Pairs of bilateral bone marrow biopsies sampled from 53 patients were decalcified according to protocols of two comparison groups: EDTA versus HCl and RDO GOLD (RDO) versus HCl. Pairs of right and left bone marrow biopsy samples harvested from 28 cases were allocated into the EDTA versus HCl comparison group, and 25 cases to the RDO versus HCl comparison group. The decalcification protocols were compared with regards to histomorphology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular analysis. For molecular analysis, we randomly selected 5 cases from the EDTA versus HCl and RDO versus HCl groups. Results: The decalcification time for appropriate histomorphologic analysis was the longest in the EDTA method and the shortest in the RDO method. EDTA was superior to RDO or HCl in DNA yield and integrity, assessed via DNA extraction, polymerase chain reaction, and silver in situ hybridization using DNA probes. The EDTA method maintained intact nuclear protein staining on immunohistochemistry, while the HCl method produced poor quality images. Staining after the RDO method had equivocal results. RNA in situ hybridization using kappa and lambda RNA probes measured RNA integrity; the EDTA and RDO method had the best quality, followed by HCl. Conclusions: The EDTA protocol would be the best in preserving genetic material. RDO may be an acceptable alternative when rapid decalcification is necessary.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84934283805&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84934283805&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4132/jptm.2015.03.16

DO - 10.4132/jptm.2015.03.16

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84934283805

VL - 49

SP - 236

EP - 242

JO - Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine

JF - Journal of Pathology and Translational Medicine

SN - 2383-7837

IS - 3

ER -