Public utility performance indicators under price regulation

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Under the Price Stabilization Act and its enforcement regulations, the price of services provided by public corporations involved in electricity generation, or railway, gas, and water services are subject to rate-of-return regulation (i.e., the price is set at the level of overall cost). This study explains the possibility of an increase in public utility rates resulting from overinvestment in capacity by public institutions when public utility rates are subject to rate-of-return regulation. A related case on the profitability of businesses (K-Water) is discussed. Despite the government’s claim that rates fall short of overall costs, K-Water earns sizable profits from its regulated businesses, and this tendency is more pronounced in businesses with higher ratios of capital expenditure to overall costs. Next, this research explores attributes required in performance indicators for public institutions under price regulation and explains the need for strengthening four criteria, including: 1) evaluation from the perspective of effectiveness, 2) evaluation of cost reduction, 3) evaluation of debt ratios, and 4) evaluation of features that induce a lower-cost level. Finally, as a result of analyzing the quantitative performance indicators of K-Water based on the 2015 Public Institution Management Evaluation Manual, we conclude that current indicators are generally consistent with these four criteria. This result suggests that current system of public institution management evaluation partly contributes to alleviating the negative side effects of rate regulation that consider overall cost.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPublic Management in Korea
Subtitle of host publicationPerformance Evaluation and Public Institutions
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages344-360
Number of pages17
ISBN (Electronic)9781351061377
ISBN (Print)9781138480940
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018 Jan 1

Fingerprint

Evaluation
Performance indicators
Public utilities
Price regulation
Costs
Public institutions
Water
Rate of return
Side effects
Capital expenditures
Debt ratio
Electricity generation
Price stabilization
Gas
Enforcement
Overinvestment
Water services
Rate regulation
Government
Profit

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance(all)
  • Business, Management and Accounting(all)

Cite this

Hong, S. (2018). Public utility performance indicators under price regulation. In Public Management in Korea: Performance Evaluation and Public Institutions (pp. 344-360). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351061384
Hong, Sounman. / Public utility performance indicators under price regulation. Public Management in Korea: Performance Evaluation and Public Institutions. Taylor and Francis, 2018. pp. 344-360
@inbook{7925f1373be94cd4ace492cffd762603,
title = "Public utility performance indicators under price regulation",
abstract = "Under the Price Stabilization Act and its enforcement regulations, the price of services provided by public corporations involved in electricity generation, or railway, gas, and water services are subject to rate-of-return regulation (i.e., the price is set at the level of overall cost). This study explains the possibility of an increase in public utility rates resulting from overinvestment in capacity by public institutions when public utility rates are subject to rate-of-return regulation. A related case on the profitability of businesses (K-Water) is discussed. Despite the government’s claim that rates fall short of overall costs, K-Water earns sizable profits from its regulated businesses, and this tendency is more pronounced in businesses with higher ratios of capital expenditure to overall costs. Next, this research explores attributes required in performance indicators for public institutions under price regulation and explains the need for strengthening four criteria, including: 1) evaluation from the perspective of effectiveness, 2) evaluation of cost reduction, 3) evaluation of debt ratios, and 4) evaluation of features that induce a lower-cost level. Finally, as a result of analyzing the quantitative performance indicators of K-Water based on the 2015 Public Institution Management Evaluation Manual, we conclude that current indicators are generally consistent with these four criteria. This result suggests that current system of public institution management evaluation partly contributes to alleviating the negative side effects of rate regulation that consider overall cost.",
author = "Sounman Hong",
year = "2018",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.4324/9781351061384",
language = "English",
isbn = "9781138480940",
pages = "344--360",
booktitle = "Public Management in Korea",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis",
address = "United States",

}

Hong, S 2018, Public utility performance indicators under price regulation. in Public Management in Korea: Performance Evaluation and Public Institutions. Taylor and Francis, pp. 344-360. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351061384

Public utility performance indicators under price regulation. / Hong, Sounman.

Public Management in Korea: Performance Evaluation and Public Institutions. Taylor and Francis, 2018. p. 344-360.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Public utility performance indicators under price regulation

AU - Hong, Sounman

PY - 2018/1/1

Y1 - 2018/1/1

N2 - Under the Price Stabilization Act and its enforcement regulations, the price of services provided by public corporations involved in electricity generation, or railway, gas, and water services are subject to rate-of-return regulation (i.e., the price is set at the level of overall cost). This study explains the possibility of an increase in public utility rates resulting from overinvestment in capacity by public institutions when public utility rates are subject to rate-of-return regulation. A related case on the profitability of businesses (K-Water) is discussed. Despite the government’s claim that rates fall short of overall costs, K-Water earns sizable profits from its regulated businesses, and this tendency is more pronounced in businesses with higher ratios of capital expenditure to overall costs. Next, this research explores attributes required in performance indicators for public institutions under price regulation and explains the need for strengthening four criteria, including: 1) evaluation from the perspective of effectiveness, 2) evaluation of cost reduction, 3) evaluation of debt ratios, and 4) evaluation of features that induce a lower-cost level. Finally, as a result of analyzing the quantitative performance indicators of K-Water based on the 2015 Public Institution Management Evaluation Manual, we conclude that current indicators are generally consistent with these four criteria. This result suggests that current system of public institution management evaluation partly contributes to alleviating the negative side effects of rate regulation that consider overall cost.

AB - Under the Price Stabilization Act and its enforcement regulations, the price of services provided by public corporations involved in electricity generation, or railway, gas, and water services are subject to rate-of-return regulation (i.e., the price is set at the level of overall cost). This study explains the possibility of an increase in public utility rates resulting from overinvestment in capacity by public institutions when public utility rates are subject to rate-of-return regulation. A related case on the profitability of businesses (K-Water) is discussed. Despite the government’s claim that rates fall short of overall costs, K-Water earns sizable profits from its regulated businesses, and this tendency is more pronounced in businesses with higher ratios of capital expenditure to overall costs. Next, this research explores attributes required in performance indicators for public institutions under price regulation and explains the need for strengthening four criteria, including: 1) evaluation from the perspective of effectiveness, 2) evaluation of cost reduction, 3) evaluation of debt ratios, and 4) evaluation of features that induce a lower-cost level. Finally, as a result of analyzing the quantitative performance indicators of K-Water based on the 2015 Public Institution Management Evaluation Manual, we conclude that current indicators are generally consistent with these four criteria. This result suggests that current system of public institution management evaluation partly contributes to alleviating the negative side effects of rate regulation that consider overall cost.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059114611&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059114611&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.4324/9781351061384

DO - 10.4324/9781351061384

M3 - Chapter

SN - 9781138480940

SP - 344

EP - 360

BT - Public Management in Korea

PB - Taylor and Francis

ER -

Hong S. Public utility performance indicators under price regulation. In Public Management in Korea: Performance Evaluation and Public Institutions. Taylor and Francis. 2018. p. 344-360 https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351061384