Quality as a reflection of innovation? Quality management in the Korean government

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Quality management generally implies all the activities that are intended to bring about the desired level of quality. In order to improve the quality of a product or service in both private and public sectors, quality management has been exercised for a long time and broadly applied in various organizations. As many new buzz words emerge in both business and public management, however, it seems that its popularity has declined. Is quality management dead? Not really. Quality is a fundamental ingredient in innovation so it must not be disregarded, although there might be fluctuations in its popularity. This study reviews the developmental status of quality management in South Korea by looking at its status and conceptual changes from historical and comparative perspectives. Historically, quality management in modern Korea was influenced by Japanese and American practices. In a comparative perspective, however, European influence on quality management was not salient in Korea. Points for practitioners More buzz words or fads will be generated by issue entrepreneurs and business consultants. However, quality management will not fade away. Continuous improvement is an endless open-ended journey, as is quality management. It is fair to say that the need for government reform and innovation will never be exhausted. Therefore, the importance of quality management will be a continuing reality in the future, perhaps with some adjustment of its rhetoric or riding on an irresistible wave of reform for adaptation. Quality has been reflected through innovation, and vice versa.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)419-435
Number of pages17
JournalInternational Review of Administrative Sciences
Volume75
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Sep 1

Fingerprint

quality management
innovation
Korea
popularity
government reform
business management
public management
South Korea
entrepreneur
fluctuation
private sector
public sector
rhetoric
reform

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Public Administration

Cite this

@article{2fc1d589c84c4852a9538aec1de2b3fd,
title = "Quality as a reflection of innovation? Quality management in the Korean government",
abstract = "Quality management generally implies all the activities that are intended to bring about the desired level of quality. In order to improve the quality of a product or service in both private and public sectors, quality management has been exercised for a long time and broadly applied in various organizations. As many new buzz words emerge in both business and public management, however, it seems that its popularity has declined. Is quality management dead? Not really. Quality is a fundamental ingredient in innovation so it must not be disregarded, although there might be fluctuations in its popularity. This study reviews the developmental status of quality management in South Korea by looking at its status and conceptual changes from historical and comparative perspectives. Historically, quality management in modern Korea was influenced by Japanese and American practices. In a comparative perspective, however, European influence on quality management was not salient in Korea. Points for practitioners More buzz words or fads will be generated by issue entrepreneurs and business consultants. However, quality management will not fade away. Continuous improvement is an endless open-ended journey, as is quality management. It is fair to say that the need for government reform and innovation will never be exhausted. Therefore, the importance of quality management will be a continuing reality in the future, perhaps with some adjustment of its rhetoric or riding on an irresistible wave of reform for adaptation. Quality has been reflected through innovation, and vice versa.",
author = "Kim, {Pan Suk}",
year = "2009",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0020852309341332",
language = "English",
volume = "75",
pages = "419--435",
journal = "International Review of Administrative Sciences",
issn = "0020-8523",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "3",

}

Quality as a reflection of innovation? Quality management in the Korean government. / Kim, Pan Suk.

In: International Review of Administrative Sciences, Vol. 75, No. 3, 01.09.2009, p. 419-435.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality as a reflection of innovation? Quality management in the Korean government

AU - Kim, Pan Suk

PY - 2009/9/1

Y1 - 2009/9/1

N2 - Quality management generally implies all the activities that are intended to bring about the desired level of quality. In order to improve the quality of a product or service in both private and public sectors, quality management has been exercised for a long time and broadly applied in various organizations. As many new buzz words emerge in both business and public management, however, it seems that its popularity has declined. Is quality management dead? Not really. Quality is a fundamental ingredient in innovation so it must not be disregarded, although there might be fluctuations in its popularity. This study reviews the developmental status of quality management in South Korea by looking at its status and conceptual changes from historical and comparative perspectives. Historically, quality management in modern Korea was influenced by Japanese and American practices. In a comparative perspective, however, European influence on quality management was not salient in Korea. Points for practitioners More buzz words or fads will be generated by issue entrepreneurs and business consultants. However, quality management will not fade away. Continuous improvement is an endless open-ended journey, as is quality management. It is fair to say that the need for government reform and innovation will never be exhausted. Therefore, the importance of quality management will be a continuing reality in the future, perhaps with some adjustment of its rhetoric or riding on an irresistible wave of reform for adaptation. Quality has been reflected through innovation, and vice versa.

AB - Quality management generally implies all the activities that are intended to bring about the desired level of quality. In order to improve the quality of a product or service in both private and public sectors, quality management has been exercised for a long time and broadly applied in various organizations. As many new buzz words emerge in both business and public management, however, it seems that its popularity has declined. Is quality management dead? Not really. Quality is a fundamental ingredient in innovation so it must not be disregarded, although there might be fluctuations in its popularity. This study reviews the developmental status of quality management in South Korea by looking at its status and conceptual changes from historical and comparative perspectives. Historically, quality management in modern Korea was influenced by Japanese and American practices. In a comparative perspective, however, European influence on quality management was not salient in Korea. Points for practitioners More buzz words or fads will be generated by issue entrepreneurs and business consultants. However, quality management will not fade away. Continuous improvement is an endless open-ended journey, as is quality management. It is fair to say that the need for government reform and innovation will never be exhausted. Therefore, the importance of quality management will be a continuing reality in the future, perhaps with some adjustment of its rhetoric or riding on an irresistible wave of reform for adaptation. Quality has been reflected through innovation, and vice versa.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=70350450400&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=70350450400&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0020852309341332

DO - 10.1177/0020852309341332

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:70350450400

VL - 75

SP - 419

EP - 435

JO - International Review of Administrative Sciences

JF - International Review of Administrative Sciences

SN - 0020-8523

IS - 3

ER -