Quantification of CO2 flow and transport in the subsurface: Uncertainty due to equations of state algorithms

Weon Shik Han, Brian J. McPherson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to evaluate uncertainty and variability generated from equations of state (EOSs) algorithms and to investigate how small errors generated from EOS algorithms propagate into evaluation of CO 2 trapping mechanisms. In a previous study, we developed two integrated EOSs algorithms assembled for calculating thermophysical properties of multiphase CO2 in deep brine reservoirs, including density, fugacity coefficient, enthalpy, viscosity, and solubility. In this chapter, we extended this previous work and focused on the uncertainty and variability associated with the choice of EOSs algorithms, using these two specific EOSs algorithms as an example case. For sake of example, we focused this uncertainty evaluation on a specific case study of the SACROC oil field in western Texas, a site notorious for 35 years of CO2 injection activity for enhanced oil recovery. For the work described in this chapter, we adapted a 3-D high-resolution geocellular model of a specific section in the SACROC oil field, developed using 3-D seismic data and extensive well logging data. Comparison of these EOSs algorithms using the 3-D SACROC model indicates that thermodynamic properties (fugacity coefficient and solubility) are strongly coupled with transport properties (e.g., fluid density and saturation) in numerical codes. While differences in CO2 solubility estimated by these two integrated EOSs algorithms are very small, the cumulative dissolved mass of CO2 ultimately predicted by the two EOSs algorithms is extremely different. In simulations of SACROC oil field, for example, the total dissolved CO2 mass differed by almost 90,000 tons over 2000 years.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)261-278
Number of pages18
JournalGeophysical Monograph Series
Volume183
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2009 Jan 1

Fingerprint

equation of state
equations of state
oil fields
oil field
solubility
fugacity
oil recovery
well logging
evaluation
enhanced oil recovery
thermodynamic property
thermophysical properties
coefficients
enthalpy
brine
trapping
seismic data
viscosity
thermodynamic properties
transport properties

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Geophysics

Cite this

@article{96b236d476434627b9fad1e710587398,
title = "Quantification of CO2 flow and transport in the subsurface: Uncertainty due to equations of state algorithms",
abstract = "The purpose of this chapter is to evaluate uncertainty and variability generated from equations of state (EOSs) algorithms and to investigate how small errors generated from EOS algorithms propagate into evaluation of CO 2 trapping mechanisms. In a previous study, we developed two integrated EOSs algorithms assembled for calculating thermophysical properties of multiphase CO2 in deep brine reservoirs, including density, fugacity coefficient, enthalpy, viscosity, and solubility. In this chapter, we extended this previous work and focused on the uncertainty and variability associated with the choice of EOSs algorithms, using these two specific EOSs algorithms as an example case. For sake of example, we focused this uncertainty evaluation on a specific case study of the SACROC oil field in western Texas, a site notorious for 35 years of CO2 injection activity for enhanced oil recovery. For the work described in this chapter, we adapted a 3-D high-resolution geocellular model of a specific section in the SACROC oil field, developed using 3-D seismic data and extensive well logging data. Comparison of these EOSs algorithms using the 3-D SACROC model indicates that thermodynamic properties (fugacity coefficient and solubility) are strongly coupled with transport properties (e.g., fluid density and saturation) in numerical codes. While differences in CO2 solubility estimated by these two integrated EOSs algorithms are very small, the cumulative dissolved mass of CO2 ultimately predicted by the two EOSs algorithms is extremely different. In simulations of SACROC oil field, for example, the total dissolved CO2 mass differed by almost 90,000 tons over 2000 years.",
author = "Han, {Weon Shik} and McPherson, {Brian J.}",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1029/2008GM000696",
language = "English",
volume = "183",
pages = "261--278",
journal = "Geophysical Monograph Series",
issn = "0065-8448",
publisher = "American Geophysical Union",

}

Quantification of CO2 flow and transport in the subsurface : Uncertainty due to equations of state algorithms. / Han, Weon Shik; McPherson, Brian J.

In: Geophysical Monograph Series, Vol. 183, 01.01.2009, p. 261-278.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quantification of CO2 flow and transport in the subsurface

T2 - Uncertainty due to equations of state algorithms

AU - Han, Weon Shik

AU - McPherson, Brian J.

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - The purpose of this chapter is to evaluate uncertainty and variability generated from equations of state (EOSs) algorithms and to investigate how small errors generated from EOS algorithms propagate into evaluation of CO 2 trapping mechanisms. In a previous study, we developed two integrated EOSs algorithms assembled for calculating thermophysical properties of multiphase CO2 in deep brine reservoirs, including density, fugacity coefficient, enthalpy, viscosity, and solubility. In this chapter, we extended this previous work and focused on the uncertainty and variability associated with the choice of EOSs algorithms, using these two specific EOSs algorithms as an example case. For sake of example, we focused this uncertainty evaluation on a specific case study of the SACROC oil field in western Texas, a site notorious for 35 years of CO2 injection activity for enhanced oil recovery. For the work described in this chapter, we adapted a 3-D high-resolution geocellular model of a specific section in the SACROC oil field, developed using 3-D seismic data and extensive well logging data. Comparison of these EOSs algorithms using the 3-D SACROC model indicates that thermodynamic properties (fugacity coefficient and solubility) are strongly coupled with transport properties (e.g., fluid density and saturation) in numerical codes. While differences in CO2 solubility estimated by these two integrated EOSs algorithms are very small, the cumulative dissolved mass of CO2 ultimately predicted by the two EOSs algorithms is extremely different. In simulations of SACROC oil field, for example, the total dissolved CO2 mass differed by almost 90,000 tons over 2000 years.

AB - The purpose of this chapter is to evaluate uncertainty and variability generated from equations of state (EOSs) algorithms and to investigate how small errors generated from EOS algorithms propagate into evaluation of CO 2 trapping mechanisms. In a previous study, we developed two integrated EOSs algorithms assembled for calculating thermophysical properties of multiphase CO2 in deep brine reservoirs, including density, fugacity coefficient, enthalpy, viscosity, and solubility. In this chapter, we extended this previous work and focused on the uncertainty and variability associated with the choice of EOSs algorithms, using these two specific EOSs algorithms as an example case. For sake of example, we focused this uncertainty evaluation on a specific case study of the SACROC oil field in western Texas, a site notorious for 35 years of CO2 injection activity for enhanced oil recovery. For the work described in this chapter, we adapted a 3-D high-resolution geocellular model of a specific section in the SACROC oil field, developed using 3-D seismic data and extensive well logging data. Comparison of these EOSs algorithms using the 3-D SACROC model indicates that thermodynamic properties (fugacity coefficient and solubility) are strongly coupled with transport properties (e.g., fluid density and saturation) in numerical codes. While differences in CO2 solubility estimated by these two integrated EOSs algorithms are very small, the cumulative dissolved mass of CO2 ultimately predicted by the two EOSs algorithms is extremely different. In simulations of SACROC oil field, for example, the total dissolved CO2 mass differed by almost 90,000 tons over 2000 years.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84899853476&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84899853476&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1029/2008GM000696

DO - 10.1029/2008GM000696

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84899853476

VL - 183

SP - 261

EP - 278

JO - Geophysical Monograph Series

JF - Geophysical Monograph Series

SN - 0065-8448

ER -