Radical prostatectomy: Respective roles and comparisons of robotic and open surgeries

Young Deuk Choi, Jae Seung Chung

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

Abstract

Over the years, several surgical modifications have been incorporated into radical prostatectomy in order to improve the surgical outcome. Despite the rapid dissemination of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) through the urologic community, comparative studies on the practicality of RALP compared to open radical prostatectomy (OP) are lacking. Thus, it remains difficult to draw any conclusions regarding cancer control and postoperative morbidity. This review will introduce the evolution of surgical technique and the current status of RALP in relation to OP in the management of localized prostate cancer focusing on the perioperative, oncological and functional outcomes. Based on the review of literatures, perioperative outcomes, such as blood loss, transfusion rates, hospitalization duration and complication rates, all favored RALP. The positive surgical margin rates of RALP were similar to those of OP with regard to the oncological outcomes. With regard to the functional outcomes, OP and RALP also showed similar continence and potency rates. However, refinements in technique employed during RALP have improved the early return of continence postoperatively. Although OP remains the gold standard treatment in localized prostate cancer, robotic surgery and continued technical advancements will ultimately improve patient outcomes. However, further prospective randomized comparative clinical trials with a long-term follow-up utilizing validated questionnaire are needed to prove the superiority of either surgical approach in terms of functional and oncological outcomes. In addition, RALP technique will need a substantial decrease in the cost of the robotic system to achieve wider global acceptance and application.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)119-125
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of the Korean Medical Association
Volume53
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010 Feb 1

Fingerprint

Robotics
Prostatectomy
Prostatic Neoplasms
Blood Transfusion
Hospitalization
Randomized Controlled Trials

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{012c65b998d446078fad66b4a793b7a8,
title = "Radical prostatectomy: Respective roles and comparisons of robotic and open surgeries",
abstract = "Over the years, several surgical modifications have been incorporated into radical prostatectomy in order to improve the surgical outcome. Despite the rapid dissemination of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) through the urologic community, comparative studies on the practicality of RALP compared to open radical prostatectomy (OP) are lacking. Thus, it remains difficult to draw any conclusions regarding cancer control and postoperative morbidity. This review will introduce the evolution of surgical technique and the current status of RALP in relation to OP in the management of localized prostate cancer focusing on the perioperative, oncological and functional outcomes. Based on the review of literatures, perioperative outcomes, such as blood loss, transfusion rates, hospitalization duration and complication rates, all favored RALP. The positive surgical margin rates of RALP were similar to those of OP with regard to the oncological outcomes. With regard to the functional outcomes, OP and RALP also showed similar continence and potency rates. However, refinements in technique employed during RALP have improved the early return of continence postoperatively. Although OP remains the gold standard treatment in localized prostate cancer, robotic surgery and continued technical advancements will ultimately improve patient outcomes. However, further prospective randomized comparative clinical trials with a long-term follow-up utilizing validated questionnaire are needed to prove the superiority of either surgical approach in terms of functional and oncological outcomes. In addition, RALP technique will need a substantial decrease in the cost of the robotic system to achieve wider global acceptance and application.",
author = "Choi, {Young Deuk} and Chung, {Jae Seung}",
year = "2010",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5124/jkma.2010.53.2.119",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "119--125",
journal = "Journal of the Korean Medical Association",
issn = "1975-8456",
publisher = "Korean Medical Association",
number = "2",

}

Radical prostatectomy : Respective roles and comparisons of robotic and open surgeries. / Choi, Young Deuk; Chung, Jae Seung.

In: Journal of the Korean Medical Association, Vol. 53, No. 2, 01.02.2010, p. 119-125.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Radical prostatectomy

T2 - Respective roles and comparisons of robotic and open surgeries

AU - Choi, Young Deuk

AU - Chung, Jae Seung

PY - 2010/2/1

Y1 - 2010/2/1

N2 - Over the years, several surgical modifications have been incorporated into radical prostatectomy in order to improve the surgical outcome. Despite the rapid dissemination of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) through the urologic community, comparative studies on the practicality of RALP compared to open radical prostatectomy (OP) are lacking. Thus, it remains difficult to draw any conclusions regarding cancer control and postoperative morbidity. This review will introduce the evolution of surgical technique and the current status of RALP in relation to OP in the management of localized prostate cancer focusing on the perioperative, oncological and functional outcomes. Based on the review of literatures, perioperative outcomes, such as blood loss, transfusion rates, hospitalization duration and complication rates, all favored RALP. The positive surgical margin rates of RALP were similar to those of OP with regard to the oncological outcomes. With regard to the functional outcomes, OP and RALP also showed similar continence and potency rates. However, refinements in technique employed during RALP have improved the early return of continence postoperatively. Although OP remains the gold standard treatment in localized prostate cancer, robotic surgery and continued technical advancements will ultimately improve patient outcomes. However, further prospective randomized comparative clinical trials with a long-term follow-up utilizing validated questionnaire are needed to prove the superiority of either surgical approach in terms of functional and oncological outcomes. In addition, RALP technique will need a substantial decrease in the cost of the robotic system to achieve wider global acceptance and application.

AB - Over the years, several surgical modifications have been incorporated into radical prostatectomy in order to improve the surgical outcome. Despite the rapid dissemination of robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) through the urologic community, comparative studies on the practicality of RALP compared to open radical prostatectomy (OP) are lacking. Thus, it remains difficult to draw any conclusions regarding cancer control and postoperative morbidity. This review will introduce the evolution of surgical technique and the current status of RALP in relation to OP in the management of localized prostate cancer focusing on the perioperative, oncological and functional outcomes. Based on the review of literatures, perioperative outcomes, such as blood loss, transfusion rates, hospitalization duration and complication rates, all favored RALP. The positive surgical margin rates of RALP were similar to those of OP with regard to the oncological outcomes. With regard to the functional outcomes, OP and RALP also showed similar continence and potency rates. However, refinements in technique employed during RALP have improved the early return of continence postoperatively. Although OP remains the gold standard treatment in localized prostate cancer, robotic surgery and continued technical advancements will ultimately improve patient outcomes. However, further prospective randomized comparative clinical trials with a long-term follow-up utilizing validated questionnaire are needed to prove the superiority of either surgical approach in terms of functional and oncological outcomes. In addition, RALP technique will need a substantial decrease in the cost of the robotic system to achieve wider global acceptance and application.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77749260579&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77749260579&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5124/jkma.2010.53.2.119

DO - 10.5124/jkma.2010.53.2.119

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:77749260579

VL - 53

SP - 119

EP - 125

JO - Journal of the Korean Medical Association

JF - Journal of the Korean Medical Association

SN - 1975-8456

IS - 2

ER -