Randomized clinical trial of ridge preservation using porcine bone/cross-linked collagen vs. bovine bone/non-cross-linked collagen: cone beam computed tomographic analysis

Hyun Chang Lim, Ui-Won Jung, Hoon You, Jung Seok Lee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to radiographically compare horizontal and vertical alterations of the alveolar ridge after ridge preservation using different combinations of biomaterials. Materials and methods: The patients were randomly assigned into two groups: (a) the test group, which received collagenated porcine bone plus cross-linked collagen membrane (n = 15), and (b) the control group, which received collagenated bovine bone plus non-cross-linked collagen membrane (n = 15). Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed immediately after ridge preservation and 4 months thereafter to compare the horizontal and vertical alterations of the ridge. Intention-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analyses were performed. Results: In both analyses, there was no statistically significant difference in the horizontal alteration of the alveolar ridge between the test and control groups: −1.3 ± 0.6 (ITT)/1.2 ± 0.5 (PP) vs. −1.5 ± 0.9 mm at the 1-mm level; −1.2 ± 0.7 (ITT and PP) vs. −1.2 ± 0.7 mm at the 3-mm level; and −0.9 ± 0.7 (ITT)/ −0.9 ± 0.7 (PP) vs. −0.9 ± 0.9 mm at the 5-mm level, whereas the vertical height in the midfacial area was significantly reduced in the test group compared with the control group: −-1.1 ± 2.8 (ITT)/1.5 ± 3.0 (PP) vs. −0.7 ± 1.8 mm. Conclusions: The horizontal ridge alteration in ridge preservation did not differ significantly between using the test the control groups, but the vertical ridge alteration was more pronounced when using the test group (KCT0001709).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1492-1500
Number of pages9
JournalClinical Oral Implants Research
Volume28
Issue number12
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017 Dec 1

Fingerprint

Swine
Collagen
Randomized Controlled Trials
Bone and Bones
Alveolar Process
Control Groups
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography
Membranes
Biocompatible Materials

All Science Journal Classification (ASJC) codes

  • Oral Surgery

Cite this

@article{0bba202d35d84ec1b521caac4b6e7d41,
title = "Randomized clinical trial of ridge preservation using porcine bone/cross-linked collagen vs. bovine bone/non-cross-linked collagen: cone beam computed tomographic analysis",
abstract = "Purpose: The aim of this study was to radiographically compare horizontal and vertical alterations of the alveolar ridge after ridge preservation using different combinations of biomaterials. Materials and methods: The patients were randomly assigned into two groups: (a) the test group, which received collagenated porcine bone plus cross-linked collagen membrane (n = 15), and (b) the control group, which received collagenated bovine bone plus non-cross-linked collagen membrane (n = 15). Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed immediately after ridge preservation and 4 months thereafter to compare the horizontal and vertical alterations of the ridge. Intention-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analyses were performed. Results: In both analyses, there was no statistically significant difference in the horizontal alteration of the alveolar ridge between the test and control groups: −1.3 ± 0.6 (ITT)/1.2 ± 0.5 (PP) vs. −1.5 ± 0.9 mm at the 1-mm level; −1.2 ± 0.7 (ITT and PP) vs. −1.2 ± 0.7 mm at the 3-mm level; and −0.9 ± 0.7 (ITT)/ −0.9 ± 0.7 (PP) vs. −0.9 ± 0.9 mm at the 5-mm level, whereas the vertical height in the midfacial area was significantly reduced in the test group compared with the control group: −-1.1 ± 2.8 (ITT)/1.5 ± 3.0 (PP) vs. −0.7 ± 1.8 mm. Conclusions: The horizontal ridge alteration in ridge preservation did not differ significantly between using the test the control groups, but the vertical ridge alteration was more pronounced when using the test group (KCT0001709).",
author = "Lim, {Hyun Chang} and Ui-Won Jung and Hoon You and Lee, {Jung Seok}",
year = "2017",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/clr.13017",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "1492--1500",
journal = "Clinical Oral Implants Research",
issn = "0905-7161",
publisher = "Blackwell Munksgaard",
number = "12",

}

Randomized clinical trial of ridge preservation using porcine bone/cross-linked collagen vs. bovine bone/non-cross-linked collagen : cone beam computed tomographic analysis. / Lim, Hyun Chang; Jung, Ui-Won; You, Hoon; Lee, Jung Seok.

In: Clinical Oral Implants Research, Vol. 28, No. 12, 01.12.2017, p. 1492-1500.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Randomized clinical trial of ridge preservation using porcine bone/cross-linked collagen vs. bovine bone/non-cross-linked collagen

T2 - cone beam computed tomographic analysis

AU - Lim, Hyun Chang

AU - Jung, Ui-Won

AU - You, Hoon

AU - Lee, Jung Seok

PY - 2017/12/1

Y1 - 2017/12/1

N2 - Purpose: The aim of this study was to radiographically compare horizontal and vertical alterations of the alveolar ridge after ridge preservation using different combinations of biomaterials. Materials and methods: The patients were randomly assigned into two groups: (a) the test group, which received collagenated porcine bone plus cross-linked collagen membrane (n = 15), and (b) the control group, which received collagenated bovine bone plus non-cross-linked collagen membrane (n = 15). Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed immediately after ridge preservation and 4 months thereafter to compare the horizontal and vertical alterations of the ridge. Intention-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analyses were performed. Results: In both analyses, there was no statistically significant difference in the horizontal alteration of the alveolar ridge between the test and control groups: −1.3 ± 0.6 (ITT)/1.2 ± 0.5 (PP) vs. −1.5 ± 0.9 mm at the 1-mm level; −1.2 ± 0.7 (ITT and PP) vs. −1.2 ± 0.7 mm at the 3-mm level; and −0.9 ± 0.7 (ITT)/ −0.9 ± 0.7 (PP) vs. −0.9 ± 0.9 mm at the 5-mm level, whereas the vertical height in the midfacial area was significantly reduced in the test group compared with the control group: −-1.1 ± 2.8 (ITT)/1.5 ± 3.0 (PP) vs. −0.7 ± 1.8 mm. Conclusions: The horizontal ridge alteration in ridge preservation did not differ significantly between using the test the control groups, but the vertical ridge alteration was more pronounced when using the test group (KCT0001709).

AB - Purpose: The aim of this study was to radiographically compare horizontal and vertical alterations of the alveolar ridge after ridge preservation using different combinations of biomaterials. Materials and methods: The patients were randomly assigned into two groups: (a) the test group, which received collagenated porcine bone plus cross-linked collagen membrane (n = 15), and (b) the control group, which received collagenated bovine bone plus non-cross-linked collagen membrane (n = 15). Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed immediately after ridge preservation and 4 months thereafter to compare the horizontal and vertical alterations of the ridge. Intention-to-treat (ITT) and per protocol (PP) analyses were performed. Results: In both analyses, there was no statistically significant difference in the horizontal alteration of the alveolar ridge between the test and control groups: −1.3 ± 0.6 (ITT)/1.2 ± 0.5 (PP) vs. −1.5 ± 0.9 mm at the 1-mm level; −1.2 ± 0.7 (ITT and PP) vs. −1.2 ± 0.7 mm at the 3-mm level; and −0.9 ± 0.7 (ITT)/ −0.9 ± 0.7 (PP) vs. −0.9 ± 0.9 mm at the 5-mm level, whereas the vertical height in the midfacial area was significantly reduced in the test group compared with the control group: −-1.1 ± 2.8 (ITT)/1.5 ± 3.0 (PP) vs. −0.7 ± 1.8 mm. Conclusions: The horizontal ridge alteration in ridge preservation did not differ significantly between using the test the control groups, but the vertical ridge alteration was more pronounced when using the test group (KCT0001709).

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85016428105&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85016428105&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/clr.13017

DO - 10.1111/clr.13017

M3 - Article

C2 - 28370361

AN - SCOPUS:85016428105

VL - 28

SP - 1492

EP - 1500

JO - Clinical Oral Implants Research

JF - Clinical Oral Implants Research

SN - 0905-7161

IS - 12

ER -